Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Codee
Dictionaries provide dictions AND common definitions.
The diction of Definition is diction.
you may think you are a smartass. But you are a dumbass.
I think I already discussed this with rentriap.
The definitions in the dictionary are DICTIONS of the words contain therein.
MRG... Your questions are infintile and I will not just keep responding to your one question requests for definitions. Either post your logic and support or don;t.
If not do not address me with the expectation of me taking the time to answer you. I am not your personal tutor.
FIRST - Definitions are used in a limitted sense. As in when a code defines a word for that code. That is a definition.
Absent a narrow definition in the code we default to the DICTION of a word. The diction of words are listed in a dictionary. This is only practacle.
There are endless definitions for words as one explores different proffessions and subculures. You cannot list every definition. But you can list dictions as they are the COMMON and not limited use of words.
That is the last time I will do this MRG. Learn to use a goddamn dictionary.
|
For the record, it is mrg, not MRG.
Again, at the end of the day, all you have is a vulgar and foul mouth, which is supposedly not to be tolerated here, a childish habit of schoolboy rhetoric you attempt to pass off as logic, and a distinct double standard as applies to your expectations of others' scholarship and that to which your own should be held.
You have a foul mouth, and an inability to respond to anything you cannot respond to otherwise except with your foul mouth, and fallacious illogical argument.
(
Ad hominem)
Where are your Law Cites?
Where are your precious Codes, and Statutes?
When someone else uses a dictionary your foul mouth shows up, along with a demand for "Law Cites."
Yet you are ignorant of Law, by your own standards, as well as in truth of the matter.
When your use of the definitionary comes up, out comes the vulgarity, and
ad hominem, and vulgar rhetoric.
You want it both ways?
Your justification is inadequate, to say the least.
If one insists upon name calling, as a
modus operandi, and means to call another "infantile," the inability to spell the term might serve the purpose of reflecting the name called back upon the one who sought to call it, might it not?
How have you not shown yourself to be, perhaps, none other than but a somewhat pathetic, semi-literate, poorly educated, and vulgar child?
So use Law Citations to define Law.
Isn't that the name of your game?
You have already applied your foul mouth to others for using dictionary, but for you it is ok?
I challenged you to "
define."
I do not recall asking for "
a definition."
You do not define.
You draw, instead, a cunning red herring.
Genetic?
One of the important uses of a dictionary is to determine the correct spelling of the word, in order that one may more intelligently convey the expression of ideas by words; style; manner of expression.
You seem to have quite rude, vulgar, crass, crude, mean, rustic, low, unrefined, and intellectually questionable diction, as well as an inability to distinguish verb from noun, and little ability to enunciate the explication of the essence of a thing by its kind and difference.
