Cody's Right to _____

[Codee]

Pissing in their face was metaphorical.

Getting entire sections of the city charter changed as DIRECT result of my counciling the city at age 20 was not an inflation of EGO. IT WAS FACT. I had done more than most lawyes before I could buy my own beer. Sorry... Law is not even what I am good at.

Some can just see how lame the common man chooses to act and some cannot admit to themselves what they see with their own two eyes.

You go ahead and claim whatever...

I AM TRYING TO KEEP PEOPLE OUT OF JAIL because they follow ignorant people who have litterally "bought" bogus law,,, IE Fraudulent material and are selling it for free to whoever and they have not even shown ANY proof of affectiveness.

THAT PISSES ME OFF!!! Go F' With your own life!!!

[ndusa]

Codee, this was not a post towards you, or anyone else who use "profanity", with the exception of those that copy and paste what got me banned or close to.

My states code says I didn't break any "profanity" law, so now I'm confussed as just to what law/AKA AH STANDARDS we are going by. (Federal, god I hope, or the state the site is set up in? umm)

I need to have this " off limit words" list, so I may participate in conversations agian without the "witch hunt" going down.

I beleive I have a few, but look in your books to see:

1-LAW
2-PROCEDURE
3-SUPREME COURT RULINGS
Is this correct?

[ndusa]

marge, see you are looking to post. good for you.

How many people do you email or im to get answeres? Wy can't you just be a man, and ty to beat codee down with some of your "law"?

Sure, you got me banned for sticking law strait up your ass, but why can't you get that done to codee??

MRG, WHEN ARE GOING TO GROW UP? ah.

[Codee]

Well NDUSA youe just have to realise that there is only noe sentance of law and that is "do unto others as you would have them do unto you"

If anyone tells you that statutes and such are law they are LIARS.

Men answer only to god (Who does not reply in words!?!?!?)

And of course if you think that "Law" includes the common law (English statutes) then you are also a moron....

HAHAHAH

LMFAO

No NDUSA... Those words are not bannable words... just foreign to most around here in their actuall accepted use.

[Codee]

NDUSA...


I may have not been banned due to being the only contributer of actuall law...

And on top of that I was for a long time the top average daily poster of real law.

What have these others contributed besides Weis??? Only regurigtations of some "package" they bought and now are spewing forth the research of others hoping to gain some friends and popularity.

I enjoy just about no one. I do not want to make even one friend nor client. I almost laugh at those that have read my posts and choose to go down a path where the knowledge is kept secret or is lacking altogether.


I still have not seen that pleading yet.

[Questionmark_Y]

"Getting entire sections of the city charter changed as DIRECT result of my counciling the city at age 20 was not an inflation of EGO. IT WAS FACT. I had done more than most lawyes before I could buy my own beer. Sorry... Law is not even what I am good at."


Cody,

You must be VERY smart, if you achieved so much before 20.

Please give us some details of the city charter changes made by your efforts.

I am also interested in reading any and all of your traffic or other court victories.


I find you to be a very fascinating person.


Keep up the good work.

[palani]

Codee posted

I still have not seen that pleading yet.

You still don't get it, do you?
When you plead are you on your knees?

[Codee]

Originally Posted by palani

Codee posted

You still don't get it, do you?
When you plead are you on your knees?

No I am not on my knees. Why do you keep insistiing on using the wrong diction/definition for words?

There is no religion in this law. you just keep on with your fantacy.

I still have not seen the argument that one presents to the magistrate after being arrestes that is supposed to explain why you cannot be prosecuted for whatever administrative law you supposedly violated.

WHAT DO YOU TELL THE MAGISTATE?!?!?

You just do not get it. You cannot answer the above and that is why your argument is a fantacy and will remain such UNTIL you can provide some proof of your claim.

You claimed to have an easier way.... Show it. Detail all the steps, filings, and papers to be produced, when to be produced and how.... Do so now.

[palani]

In your case I would suggest you try for benefit of clergy but am afraid the spelling would be a dead giveaway.

The past 20 some odd pages have simply detailed exactly the nature of the trespass committed by your representatives. The legal authorities given were simply to convince you that there was a trespass. Your representatives know there was a trespass; they came up with the remedy. The remedy is the expatriation act. In the course of effecting the remedy you end up with a contract. Record it and you have some pretty bulletproof paperwork. No pleading. Simply a written contract to enforce.

What don't you get? You have no right to travel in the status you are currently in. You have even stated as much yourself. After expatriating you are back 'in law' under the organic constitution and you have every right to travel, with a written contract to back it up.

What you see is all you get.

[mrg]

Originally Posted by Codee

No I am not on my knees. Why do you keep insistiing on using the wrong diction/definition for words?

There is no religion in this law. you just keep on with your fantacy.

I still have not seen the argument that one presents to the magistrate after being arrestes that is supposed to explain why you cannot be prosecuted for whatever administrative law you supposedly violated.

WHAT DO YOU TELL THE MAGISTATE?!?!?

You just do not get it. You cannot answer the above and that is why your argument is a fantacy and will remain such UNTIL you can provide some proof of your claim.

You claimed to have an easier way.... Show it. Detail all the steps, filings, and papers to be produced, when to be produced and how.... Do so now.

Look, you are pleading and praying, before a "judge," for absolution (read the bible--a judge is, like it or not, historically, a religious term) dressed in the habit of clergy.

That is what is said, by use of those very words, to be going on, and that is what is going on.

Pray means pray.

A cassock, is a priest's garment.

A judge wears a cassock.

That is what it is, a cassock.

The judge, or magistrate is a cleric.

c.1200, clergie "office or dignity of a clergyman," from two O.Fr. words:

1. clergie "clerics, learned men," from M.L. clericatus, from L. clericus (see clerk);

2. clergie "learning," from clerc, also from L. clericus. Clergyman is 1577; clergywoman is 1673.

Cleric (1621) was borrowed directly from L. clericus after clerk took its modern meaning.

Clerical (1592) was originally "of the clergy;" meaning "of clerks" first attested 1798.

The Online Etymology Dictionary

Perhaps you are even attending confession, to receive penance.

Confession is confession, whether in court or in church, it is the same thing.

Penance is done by a penitent, in a penitentiary.

If there is no religion to this law, why are the walls of all the courtrooms in my County's Courthouses plastered with God's name in two foot high gold letters?

First you say use common definitions, then you say use statutory definitions, then you say use legal definitions then you say do not use legal definitions, do not use common definitions; you twist words into persuasions to suit your immediate uses.