
06-11-2007, 02:56 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,745
|
|
What context? DLs? But the federal govt doesn't issue its own DLs. However 49 USC secs 30301 to 30308 deal with a "National Driver Register", which is supposed to serve as a clearing house of the driving records of all the states.
Definitions are given in sec 30301:
Quote:
(4) "motor vehicle" means a vehicle, machine, tractor, traler, or semitrailer propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used on public streets, roads, or highway, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line.
(5) "motor vehicle operator's license" means a license issued by a State authorizing an individual to operate a motor vehicle on public streets, roads or highways.
|
Seems to be pretty all-inclusive and makes no exemption for "non-commercial" driving. This law (including its definitions) was enacted in 1994 and there's been little or no litigation over it.
However in 2005, Congress enacted Public Law 109-13, which, in its second chapter, provided for improved security for DLs and ID cards, and required, among other things, that by May 2008, the DLs and ID cards issued by every state would include the person's FULL legal name, date of birth, gender, a digital photograph, address of principle residence, signature, and various anti-tampering and anti-counterfeiting features.
And, to obtain a DL, one must present a number of documents including official proof of the person's SSN or else proof that this person is not eligible for an SSN, and similarly "valid documentary evidence" of the person's citizenship status.
Lotsaluck getting around all that.
|

06-11-2007, 04:00 PM
|
 |
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 676
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shoonra
What context? DLs? But the federal govt doesn't issue its own DLs. However 49 USC secs 30301 to 30308 deal with a "National Driver Register", which is supposed to serve as a clearing house of the driving records of all the states.
Definitions are given in sec 30301:
Seems to be pretty all-inclusive and makes no exemption for "non-commercial" driving. This law (including its definitions) was enacted in 1994 and there's been little or no litigation over it.
However in 2005, Congress enacted Public Law 109-13, which, in its second chapter, provided for improved security for DLs and ID cards, and required, among other things, that by May 2008, the DLs and ID cards issued by every state would include the person's FULL legal name, date of birth, gender, a digital photograph, address of principle residence, signature, and various anti-tampering and anti-counterfeiting features.
And, to obtain a DL, one must present a number of documents including official proof of the person's SSN or else proof that this person is not eligible for an SSN, and similarly "valid documentary evidence" of the person's citizenship status.
Lotsaluck getting around all that.
|
Under what Constitutional grant of power did the legislature pass the act you reference in 49 USC?
__________________
Liberty: Freedom from restraint and the power to follow one's own will to choose a course of conduct. Liberty, like freedom, has its inherent restraint to act without harm to others and within the accepted rules of conduct for the benefit of the general public.
|

06-11-2007, 04:07 PM
|
 |
Practice Makes Perfect
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: texas
Posts: 223
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Akira-
The people own the roads. Government, as servants, use the peoples assets to maintain the peoples roads, ect.
|
Well all said and done. One must remember that statutes, codes, regulations are all "color of law". Not the law itself but evidence of a common law. "color of office", "color of authority", are all fiction. State created corporations must follow these "colored laws". A natural person needs to reassert their common law rights or constitutional rights. The Texas Constitution/ Article 12-PRIVATE CORPORATIONS/ Section 1 - CREATION BY GENERAL LAWS: No private corporation shall be CREATED except by general laws.
|

06-11-2007, 07:02 PM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,326
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by clarkee
Well all said and done. One must remember that statutes, codes, regulations are all "color of law". Not the law itself but evidence of a common law. "color of office", "color of authority", are all fiction. State created corporations must follow these "colored laws". A natural person needs to reassert their common law rights or constitutional rights. The Texas Constitution/ Article 12-PRIVATE CORPORATIONS/ Section 1 - CREATION BY GENERAL LAWS: No private corporation shall be CREATED except by general laws.
|
This all works out in theory. Since 1861 the nation has been in an emergency and the Writs are suspended. Appearance cures all defects in jurisdiction so the only thing to do is abate the nuisance without any appearance and that leaves the court of the impound yard manager.
In trying to establish a link between county court and the impound yard I lost my scooter and went to jail when I could have abated the cause, if only I had known I would lose the scooter anyway.
Regards,
David Merrill.
|

06-11-2007, 07:20 PM
|
 |
Practice Makes Perfect
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: texas
Posts: 223
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David Merrill
This all works out in theory. Since 1861 the nation has been in an emergency and the Writs are suspended. Appearance cures all defects in jurisdiction so the only thing to do is abate the nuisance without any appearance and that leaves the court of the impound yard manager.
In trying to establish a link between county court and the impound yard I lost my scooter and went to jail when I could have abated the cause, if only I had known I would lose the scooter anyway.
Regards,
David Merrill.
|
Thats a good one David. Yea, your probably right in theory but somehow we have to get that theory and put it in reality. How? I don't know and I guess thats why most of us is here. We know something is very wrong but we will prevail in the long run
|

06-11-2007, 07:24 PM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,326
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by clarkee
Thats a good one David. Yea, your probably right in theory but somehow we have to get that theory and put it in reality. How? I don't know and I guess thats why most of us is here. We know something is very wrong but we will prevail in the long run
|
Well, next time I will treat the seizure in admiralty down at the impound yard as a completely separate matter.
I thought that if I was able to win my case in county court based in the arguments you find here, then the county court judge would have to order release/replevin of the scooter. All attorneys involved just
...looked at me
incredulously;
like a cow
at a passing train...
Regards,
David Merrill.
|

06-17-2007, 04:50 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,239
|
|
|
Whats the procedure applicable to admirality siezures?
"the High Sieze" No kidding.
|

07-02-2007, 09:15 AM
|
|
Practice Makes Perfect
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 397
|
|
|
Clarkee, We don't have any Constitutional rights, we have Constitutional PROTECTIONS.
Happy Days to All
Kitchie
|

07-02-2007, 11:40 AM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: kingdom of heaven
Posts: 1,577
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Well, next time I will treat the seizure in admiralty down at the impound yard as a completely separate matter.
I thought that if I was able to win my case in county court based in the arguments you find here, then the county court judge would have to order release/replevin of the scooter. All attorneys involved just
...looked at me
incredulously;
like a cow
at a passing train...
Regards,
David Merrill.
|
Without Prejudice.
The scooter (abandoned vessel?) was personified and it was a separate case.
__________________
All rights reserved. No Liability Assumed. No Value Assured. Without Recourse. Private. Not for hire.
Last edited by fulltitle : 07-03-2007 at 03:47 AM.
|

08-07-2007, 06:50 PM
|
|
Banned User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 87
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KITCHIE
Clarkee, We don't have any Constitutional rights, we have Constitutional PROTECTIONS.
Happy Days to All
Kitchie
|
Freedom of Religion is a god given right/freedom?
Last edited by DCLXVI : 08-07-2007 at 07:08 PM.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:09 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
|
|