Travel Discuss how to reclaim the right to travel freely, public access, etc.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Travel
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #51  
Old 08-10-2007, 05:01 AM
farmer_giles_of_ham farmer_giles_of_ham is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,239
Thanks- all this joinder and rejoinder keeps the knife sharp at any rate. I should be able to articulate my own position.

Does your R4C method abate the nusiance? For how long, on average- as in, enough time to let the legal clock run out? I dont understand what the deal is with the federal court- do you open up a new case there in response to state/local actions? I get the idea, 'saving to suitors', I am short on the mechanics.

I mentioned on this site that I was abating a foreclosure proceeding by negative averments/judicial notice, but each time I presented, the opposition filed PRAECIPE for new case etc...so it was like ping pong, the classic 'race to the court house'. The score kept getting reset to zero.
If I could have oputlasted them the full 6 years for the mortgage to expire due to Statute of Limits...but I had to move on anyway, so they got the house.

Same deal w/ R4C? Of course driving issues expire way sooner.


BTW- since you seem to have a bone to pick with Paul, here is a link for your consideration.

http://www.ensignmessage.com/archives/heresy.html
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 08-10-2007, 05:21 AM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,326
expiration of commerce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by farmer_giles_of_ham
Thanks- all this joinder and rejoinder keeps the knife sharp at any rate. I should be able to articulate my own position.

Does your R4C method abate the nusiance? For how long, on average- as in, enough time to let the legal clock run out? I dont understand what the deal is with the federal court- do you open up a new case there in response to state/local actions? I get the idea, 'saving to suitors', I am short on the mechanics.

Yes. It actually goes back to a decade ago with the Randy Lee abatements. All the fluff removed. You may see with Goffer and JRB there is no point in any fluff. Attorneys will not be edified so simply Refuse for Cause since that costs $25 in Registered Mail anyway, you might as well spend very little time on it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by farmer_giles_of_ham
I mentioned on this site that I was abating a foreclosure proceeding by negative averments/judicial notice, but each time I presented, the opposition filed PRAECIPE for new case etc...so it was like ping pong, the classic 'race to the court house'. The score kept getting reset to zero.

Yes indeed. There will be a cool day below when there are laws passed interfering with commerce and presentments.

Quote:
Originally Posted by farmer_giles_of_ham
If I could have oputlasted them the full 6 years for the mortgage to expire due to Statute of Limits...but I had to move on anyway, so they got the house.

Yep. That can happen. One suitor is dying of cancer so he called the IRS to settle things because he may run out of time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by farmer_giles_of_ham
Same deal w/ R4C? Of course driving issues expire way sooner.

Yes. I showed this Order and Decree to Goffer and he seemed reduced to nonproductive insults for over an hour:

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...and_Decree.rtf

After those traffic charges disappeared they ran the gambit from dog at large to attempted murder. All ineffective.


Quote:
Originally Posted by farmer_giles_of_ham
BTW- since you seem to have a bone to pick with Paul, here is a link for your consideration.

http://www.ensignmessage.com/archives/heresy.html

I think it a little dangerous to say it is a bone to pick. I think it more that God can use someone like Paul, a cowardly thief. His strength is not effected by our weaknesses and He is steady in all His endeavors. The Lord's use of Paul really teaches us all a lesson in humility.



Regards,

David Merrill.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoonra
It is worth noting that the fealty to the Pope, which you cited for its explicit mention of the Templar abbey in Dover, is the legal basis for the invalidation of the Magna Carta after it was sealed at Runnymede.
During discussion about the Treaty of 1213 and the Magna Charta (1215).

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/medieval/magframe.htm
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/john1a.html
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CRA issue (actually, 3 issues) Tatsy Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 1 12-08-2005 02:57 AM
Copyright Issue easynbwc2 UCC 1 12-20-2004 08:25 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:17 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer