Silver Bullet

[mrg]

Originally Posted by fulltitle

Without Prejudice.

As I've alluded to with some...perhaps a birth certificate in some ways is more for them than for you.

And in some ways, applying reciprocity, relative to its being useful to them, might it also not possibly be useful to you?

reciprocity

1. a relation of mutual dependence or action or influence

2. mutual exchange of commercial or other privileges

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2003. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

[aksis]

Originally Posted by Shoonra

You seriously misunderstand a simple sentence. A voluntary driver is an operator, just not for gain or compensation or profit.

Shoonra,

You're right, a drive is an operator.

If they arn't getting paied, that is their problem... While it is rare, the driver of a taxi has given me a free ride before, they have also negotiated the fare on occasion.

We all know the Courts have held that a Statute that would alienate an unalienable right (or even a civil right), is in fact, void, and no law at all.

If People are forced to be treated as drivers when they choose to travel via their unalienable right of way, then the right of way and the right to travel would be being alienated.

A Treaty on the Highways - Chapter 1 - The Way

The "right of way" seems to be being misunderstood by you. You seriously misunderstand a simple common right.

It is obviously an aspect of the right of Liberty, do you disagree with this?

People obviously have a right to travel via their right of way.

Why do you keep trying to imply they do not?

Why do you keep trying to trun them into drivers and operators when they don't want to drive or operate motor vehicles?

People have no right to use the way for profit (drive) without a licence. We the People want our peice of the pie. Prehaps this is the answer to these questions.


Sincerley,

Christopher Theodore: Rhodes

P.S.

Until there has been an infringment upon someones rights, there is no valid claim for relief and there is no one that can make a valid complaint.

The possibility of a crime is not a crime.

P.P.S.

Prehaps I am missing Shoonras point...

[rentiap]

Originally Posted by fulltitle

Without Prejudice.

As I've alluded to with some...perhaps a birth certificate in some ways is more for them than for you.

When everyone cognizes that this document that is known as a "Birth Certificate" is nothing more than certification of an event.
The event of the berth of a person(persona)a human resource.(I am not a hu-man that would be a color of man)I am a man!!!!!!!
Not the registration of the fetus(that would be involuntary servitude wouldn't it?)that BC is not you.it's a piece of paper with writing on it.(Are you the same as a piece of paper?)
That certificate known as a birth certificate was never and is never identification for you the man or woman,

It is just personal identification for that event,
Just like 911 was an event.

[Shoonra]

It's true that a birth certificate cannot be used as identification, but it is proof of citizenship.
When applying for a passport, you need reasonably recent and recognizable ID (such a DL or even a highschool yearbook), and a birth certificate.

[palani]

Originally Posted by Shoonra

It's true that a birth certificate cannot be used as identification, but it is proof of citizenship.

Which nation would the birth certificate represent citizenship in then? Or does it simply indicate that you were born on Earth (as is 100% of the population of Man)?

Originally Posted by Shoonra

When applying for a passport, you need reasonably recent and recognizable ID (such a DL or even a highschool yearbook), and a birth certificate.

So that is why cabbage patch dolls are so popular with Mexicans?