
07-29-2008, 08:36 PM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,318
|
|
Very good.
The Libel of Review combines 1789 law with 1913 remedy and acquires the application in the "exclusive original cognizance" of the US government. The suitor becomes competent in common law through utilizing the common law county clerk and recorder for process. Utilizing the true name designates God-given unalienable rights of a living man or woman.
http://friends-n-family-research.inf..._falsified.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf..._corrected.jpg
Sometimes after appearance and/or arraignment things are not so effective but the lessons learned keep referrals coming. A lot of times people stumble across a suitor who built a castle, James Roland. He enjoys telling people about remedy and me.
Regards,
David Merrill.
Last edited by David Merrill : 07-30-2008 at 08:16 AM.
|

08-08-2008, 08:13 AM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,318
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Held in Default
You think because this guy was not arrested in OHIO on a PA traffic charge that somehow amounts to proof that the R4C worked?
One state usually does not pick up foreigners on foreign charges of a traffic violation. My god the paperwork and appeals on that are insane!
Further YOU were fined. So why would they arrest your driver?
|
Yeah! Really now Cody! You think just because somebody wrote it on the Internet that makes it true? People can write what they believe here and the rules make it so that you have to keep coming back in different handles - already about six or seven, right? - Simply because you like to make people feel inferior to you.
I think it worth the trouble, if I were a moderator, to banish you every time you crop up - like a weed around here.
Good Riddance;
David Merrill.
|

08-17-2008, 03:03 PM
|
|
Unplugged
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 128
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Held in Default
If the DOT is fining him it probably under U.S. authority taken under the interstate commerce clause. I strongly suggest you do not try an R4C with the feds.
To the original poster:
In may states a warrant is not issued for traffic violations and fines. A number of states will simply file the default and place a hold on your license preventing it from being renewed. Then after TWO default non-paid violations they will suspend your license. Still no warrant however.
|
Let me explain something to you unknowing suspects, I don't care if its from the president, ITS A PRESENTMENT, get it? And yes the DOT presentment was R4C, it was in the carrier name (me) I also never received correspondants from the DOT after the fact, and the violations were in the drivers name, (my Husband) and those were also R4C, there is no blocks on the drivers's license as I said before it was checked, NOTHING is there to prevent a renewel of the thing. Is this clear enough for you?
|

08-17-2008, 03:26 PM
|
|
Unplugged
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 128
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Held in Default
You think because this guy was not arrested in OHIO on a PA traffic charge that somehow amounts to proof that the R4C worked?
One state usually does not pick up foreigners on foreign charges of a traffic violation. My god the paperwork and appeals on that are insane!
Further YOU were fined. So why would they arrest your driver?
|
No the driver was fined, and they were trying to get him to deliver me a presentment, to be, fined which never made it to me.
Now your getting the idea, but make up your mind WHO is the foreigner, us or them and who does the foreign charges belong to, certainly not I or the driver, no doubt in my mind, and thats all that really matters.
And don't think they won't transport a victim if they thought he owed $4000.00, thats a lot of FRNs to pass up.
|

08-17-2008, 03:37 PM
|
 |
Unplugged
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 178
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Yeah! Really now Cody! You think just because somebody wrote it on the Internet that makes it true? People can write what they believe here and the rules make it so that you have to keep coming back in different handles - already about six or seven, right? - Simply because you like to make people feel inferior to you.
I think it worth the trouble, if I were a moderator, to banish you every time you crop up - like a weed around here.
Good Riddance;
David Merrill.
|
Well David, he obviously doesn't do a good job of it, just look at the other thread where this clown tries to criticize another member about speeding and physics but doesn't even know basic physics himself, which is why he couldn't even figure out what the scientific formula for Distance (D=SxT) was! lol I think you should bust this guy as much as you can on all the stupid mistakes he makes because he really has a big head and this needs to be popped, which will hopefully bring this guy down a peg or two! Thanks,
Regards,
IA
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:55 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
|
|