How to use your state's APA

[weishaupt1776]

Continued:

Originally Posted by Royce E Mitchell

So, what is the remedy when your right to property is being manhandled using the Transportation Code, or whatever passes for that code? The remedy is in agency action, specifically the "contested case." In that contested case, you can demand to know by what authority the agency is regulating private property. They have no authority. It is only by the brute force of faux criminal actions and the liberty granted by allowing voluntary servitude to be legal under the Thirteenth Amendment that said authority is manufactured.

We are then left with private property not submitted to the jurisdiction of our servants but which servants attempt to regulate. They use a code designed to regulate commerce. The state creates an agency to answer questions about the application of the code. The agency is mandated to create a final decision. We have the right to the agency hearing to determine whether or not our property is regulatable under the provisions of the Code the agency was designed to administer.

While you can ignore your right to an agency determination and go to court criminally, I do not advise it because in doing so you submit yourself to your servants who have no authority. You can win there, but the deck is stacked against you because of the presumption that your auto is the state's motor vehicle, and because you have mostly ignorant "judges" in place in those courts.

Here is where LD is ignorant. He's been stuck in his rut for so long that he no longer sees the law in a big picture, as it was designed for our protection. If he ever understood the purpose of agency law, he certainly does not now. He was disruptive and I let it go on for too long.

Feel free, anyone who wants, to learn what he has to teach. He will charge you for it, and the laborer is worthy of his hire. But, please do not let yourselves be bullied into accepting his "law" as gospel. There is much that he does not know. I admit I don't know it all, but what I do know I know well. I walk the walk, putting into work the research I guide here to prove that it is valid. I've proven both the SMJ (admin motion to dismiss) motion as well as the failure of process motion. I use the process motion first because you waive that matter if you fail to object. It provides a path to interlocutory appeal which costs THEM lots of money.

My purpose is to either get an immediate dismissal or to cost the hell out of the servants for failure to dismiss. I desire to bring down the system, not make a meager living off of perpetuating the ignorance. Hence, this forum exists.

Again, I apologize for letting LD get out of hand. I should have terminated the discussion earlier. I held the mistaken belief that LD could learn something. I now realize that he was merely attempting to protect his meager living by attacking that which he did not understand. That was why he never brought any law. After deleting about 6-8 posts from him today, I realize that he can't bring the law to support himself because he doesn't understand it. Moreover, he didn't want to learn it.

That's OK with me if anyone doesn't want to learn how to fight and demand the authority by which the servants act. I'm just not going to allow them to cast doubt by pontification instead of providing law.