Drivers License

[Shoonra]

I do not know of a court case involving a convoluted signature like that, but I feel certain that either (1) the DMV would reject such a signature and insist on a conventional signature before it issues a DL, or (2) even if such a signature were on the DL it would not be allowed to have any effect on the application of the traffic laws to the driver.

[rentiap]

What I asked for was some proof!
Not what you FEEL! even for CERTAIN for that matter.
Nobody on this forum wants your indoctrinated feelings or you opinion.
I for one couldn't give a $hit about your opinion and no matter how much you polish a turd it will always be a turd.
Try bringing some proof to this forum and leave your twisting in KS.

Sheese Bernie go back to quatloose and continue to be the laughing stock over there where you belong with your kind.

You have ceased to be amusing here on this forum may be you can go back to Demo and tell her that the guys over have had enough of your $hite.
You are definitely on my ignore list.

Originally Posted by Shoonra

I do not know of a court case involving a convoluted signature like that, but I feel certain that either (1) the DMV would reject such a signature and insist on a conventional signature before it issues a DL, or (2) even if such a signature were on the DL it would not be allowed to have any effect on the application of the traffic laws to the driver.

[ezrhythm]

AWAY FROM HERE Shoonra unless you are going to promote the SUI JURIS MAN!!!

[rentiap]

Originally Posted by ezrhythm

AWAY FROM HERE Shoonra unless you are going to promote the sui juris person!!!

Of course you did mean People not person correct?

[ezrhythm]

THERE! How's that?

[rentiap]

Originally Posted by ezrhythm

THERE! How's that?

Lovin it!!!

[fulltitle]

Originally Posted by rentiap

Bills of Exchange Act
PART II: BILLS OF EXCHANGE
Liabilities of Parties

Trade-name or assumed name
131. (1) Where a person signs a bill in a trade-name or assumed name, he is liable thereon as if he had signed it in his own name.



Firm name
(2) The signature of the name of a firm is equivalent to the signature, by the person so signing, of the names of all persons liable as partners in that firm.

R.S., c. B-5, s. 132.

http://www.canlii.org/ca/sta/b-4/

Without Prejudice.
Appears they are talking about registered names or fictitious name registrations {such as might be re: a Birth Certificate}.

[robhalford88]

Originally Posted by Elect

"Here card. This not me. You go away. Ugh."

;-)

Damn. You made me laugh with that one and I needed that.
Thanks.

[indio007]

without prejudice does not necessarily nullify a contract.

signing "authorized representative" would limit liability to the legal fiction.

"without recourse" would disavow all liability associated with the instrument.

"not for accommodation" would indicate you are not undertaking a liability to pay on the instrument for the strawman in case of it's non-payment.

However paying in FRN's could be a limiting factor on the last 2 restrictive endorsements. The mere act of paying in FRN's incurs a liability associated with that particular debt instrument and the associated transactions.

However you could you could restrictively endorse the FRN's exempting yourself from liability on them.

It's a tricky little game.