passport?

[fulltitle]

You cannot forge or counterfeit your own do***ents--you simply make them.

Originally Posted by David Merrill

Indeed there is a huge difference between forgery and counterfeiting.

The attached POMC is perfectly legal tender of the exact same specie as FRNs - redeemable in lawful money. The prosecution failed because the DA had no oath of office with the secretary of state, but the charge was forgery, based on the size and shape of the POMC itself. Look at it. It looks too much like a check.

...

Regards,

David Merrill.

Without Prejudice.
For those who are missing the point...this discussion ties into the issue of birth certificate bonding. Robert Fox's travel do***ent was neither a counterfeit nor a forgery of anything associated with the birth certificate bonding of any UN member State, therefore he was neither forging nor counterfeiting as far as they were concerned.

Originally Posted by fulltitle

"You cannot forge your own do***ents--you simply make them."

And ...David Merrill's POMC could not have been an act counterfeiting or forgery in the specific definition of his accusers for very similar reasons.

[robhalford88]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

No. I missed that but you are welcome to link us there.

The Protocols are a very touchy nerve indeed. A fabrication and a spoof are two very different animals indeed. The Jews themselves calling the Protocols a forgery - especially the Jews if I may say being eloquent attorneys more than most, is quite the Tell.


Regards,

David Merrill.

Start here and read on.
http://goldismoney.info/forums/showp...3&postcount=41
They lost interest now. Probably because they were losing, as usual.
Those anti-racist nuggets haven't got a clue.

[Shoonra]

The Protocols are a forgery (as well as a fraud) because they pretend to be from the Zionist Congress (presumably the one as Basle). Whatever you want to call them, no sensible person calls them authentic.

As for your POMC's, Congress never declared it legal tender. What Congress did do is call them "ficititious obligations" and trying to use them can put you right back in the slammer, where I bet they still talk about you.

[robhalford88]

Originally Posted by Shoonra

The Protocols are a forgery (as well as a fraud) because they pretend to be from the Zionist Congress (presumably the one as Basle). Whatever you want to call them, no sensible person calls them authentic.

As for your POMC's, Congress never declared it legal tender. What Congress did do is call them "ficititious obligations" and trying to use them can put you right back in the slammer, where I bet they still talk about you.

If you read my posts, you would know that I believe they are accurate upto the point where they identify the so called jews.
I am not convinced that the jews are behind them, but I do believe some power is following them.
Clue, why do the jews spend so much time and money, we all know money is important to them, to defend this if it is so obviously a fraud?

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by Shoonra

The Protocols are a forgery (as well as a fraud) because they pretend to be from the Zionist Congress (presumably the one as Basle). Whatever you want to call them, no sensible person calls them authentic.

As for your POMC's, Congress never declared it legal tender. What Congress did do is call them "ficititious obligations" and trying to use them can put you right back in the slammer, where I bet they still talk about you.

Like I said; The Jews readily admit that the Protocols are a forgery. It was proving that the POMC was a forgery, that I intended them to look like checks, that got me out of the slammer. At least it would have if the DA would have been prosecuting from a valid office. He quit work the next morning after I file his indictment into the case.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[fulltitle]

Without Prejudice.

Like I said; The Jews readily admit that the Protocols are a forgery. It was proving that the POMC was a forgery, that I intended them to look like checks, that got me out of the slammer. At least it would have if the DA would have been prosecuting from a valid office. He quit work the next morning after I file his indictment into the case

Am I missing something?

[Shoonra]

SFBFKADVP must be going senile. He served 66 days in the slammer for multiple contempts of court, for which he pled guilty and was given an additional two year deferred sentence. At the same time he was also given a deferred sentence for multiple counts of forgery.

This is still on record at the El Paso County (Colo.) District Court.

I feel sure that Van Pelt made himself popular in the slammer, and won praise for his purty mouth. And I sure that he hated to leave his cellmates behind. And that his cellmate misses Van Pelt's behind, too.

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by Shoonra

SFBFKADVP must be going senile. He served 66 days in the slammer for multiple contempts of court, for which he pled guilty and was given an additional two year deferred sentence. At the same time he was also given a deferred sentence for multiple counts of forgery.

This is still on record at the El Paso County (Colo.) District Court.

I feel sure that Van Pelt made himself popular in the slammer, and won praise for his purty mouth. And I sure that he hated to leave his cellmates behind. And that his cellmate misses Van Pelt's behind, too.

How about that??

This is for sure a sign that I have said something right on! We have Shoonra playing Mr. Homophobia about it...

http://www.state.gov/do***ents/organization/79955.pdf

I am supposing it is the inherent admission that my name is actually David Merrill - not Van Pelt.

1. PROOF OF U.S. CITIZENSHIP

a. APPLICANTS BORN IN THE UNITED STATES:

Submit a previous U.S. passport or certified birth certificate. A birth certificate must include your full name, the full name of your parent(s), date and place of birth, sex, date the birth record was filed...

1. PROOF OF U.S. CITIZENSHIP

a. APPLICANTS BORN IN THE UNITED STATES:

Submit a previous U.S. passport or certified birth certificate. A birth certificate must include your given name and surname, date, and place of birth, date the birth record was filed...

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...Definition.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...Name_legal.jpg


Legal and full name are when you follow your Christian or given name with the family or surname. It is not your name. And the legal industry collecting for the Treasury really has to have that handle on me - Van Pelt, to enforce its First Lien on anything I may purchase with the private credit from the Fed. Good thing I always redeem lawful money prior to ever touching private credit.

Otherwise Bernie's crude slurs might make me feel badly, rather than encourage me that I have really, really upset yet another attorner.

(Attachments) There is a Monument to the Magna Charta on the banks of the Thames River in the Independent and Sovereign City of London. Both the Middle Temple (Knights Templar) and the International Bar Association are nested there. And it would seem one day some attorneys, like Shoonra, held a funeral for it?


Regards,

David Merrill.


P.S. The record Shoonra refers to is that after about 70 days in jail for "forgery" (because the POMCs I was tendering were about the size of standard bank checks) I indicated I would plead guilty in order to Indict John Suthers and vacate the prosecution as void. So the information Shoonra sees might actually indicate a guilty plea. However, I do not participate in prosecutions from vacant officials. I indict them like I did District Attorney John Suthers. He cleaned out his office the next day.

[robhalford88]

Originally Posted by Shoonra

SFBFKADVP must be going senile. He served 66 days in the slammer for multiple contempts of court, for which he pled guilty and was given an additional two year deferred sentence. At the same time he was also given a deferred sentence for multiple counts of forgery.

This is still on record at the El Paso County (Colo.) District Court.

I feel sure that Van Pelt made himself popular in the slammer, and won praise for his purty mouth. And I sure that he hated to leave his cellmates behind. And that his cellmate misses Van Pelt's behind, too.

Typical jew, you can't leave the filth out, can you? And you have the chutzpah to pretend you don't know why your kin are THE most hated race on Earth.

By the way, you might get a chance to see the inside of the corrections facilities too.
Just wait and see.

[Shoonra]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

P.S. The record Shoonra refers to is that after about 70 days in jail for "forgery" (because the POMCs I was tendering were about the size of standard bank checks) I indicated I would plead guilty in order to Indict John Suthers and vacate the prosecution as void. So the information Shoonra sees might actually indicate a guilty plea. However, I do not participate in prosecutions from vacant officials. I indict them like I did District Attorney John Suthers. He cleaned out his office the next day.

Gee, the real info about John Suthers ...
http://www.ago.state.co.us/about_ag.cfm?cpyID=17
... shows he was District Attorney right up to the end of his elected term (Jan. 1997), at which time he returned to his private law practice, then he becam the Exec Director of the Colorado prison system, then US Attorney for Colorado, and, since 2005, the Attorney-General of Colorado.

So where was his indictment? Where was his disgraceful departure from office? I think Van Pelt is diseased at both ends.

As for SFBFKADVP's lame argument about the size of his funny money, that excuse was raised and rejected in People v. Mohoff (Calif. App. 4th Dist., nr. G-037232, 111/26/2007).