
10-26-2004, 06:08 PM
|
|
|
|
Traffic Court Losses
camino, the rules in every state also say u can file the affidavit after trail by using the rule for mistake.
|

10-26-2004, 07:42 PM
|
 |
Practice Makes Perfect
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 327
|
|
|
Traffic Court Losses
If you didn't read my response, I suggest you do, because I believe it will stop the action against you immediately.
__________________
Birth Condemns No One To Heed The Will Of Evil
|

10-28-2004, 01:51 PM
|
 |
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 805
|
|
|
Traffic Court Losses
Man Weis,
I wish I had some suggestions for you as far as what you could have said. One thing that comes to mind is that you could have "not consented" to his offer to enter a plea. I have not heard of a hearing like this before.
|

10-28-2004, 04:48 PM
|
|
|
|
Traffic Court Losses
better yet, if they entered a plea of not guilty for you, then whats the problem? u r not guilty, make them honor their plea for you.
|

10-28-2004, 08:20 PM
|
|
|
|
Traffic Court Losses
that's a plea, not a verdict/judgment...
jon
|

10-28-2004, 09:20 PM
|
 |
Practice Makes Perfect
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 327
|
|
|
Traffic Court Losses
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jmunson
that's a plea, not a verdict/judgment...
jon
|
If the judge was your Legal Representative then it is a Plea..otherwise if he is the judge it is his/her verdict. If you did not appoint him your representative then it is Fraud.
They CANNOT answer on your behalf, or they appoint themselves your representative. If he was Not being your representative then he is the Judge, and it is his verdict. So, which was he....because he CANNOT be both...or he is deep do-do.
So assume he was the Judge, thank him for the acquittal, and refuse to show up to any future dates on the matter, it is settled.
__________________
Birth Condemns No One To Heed The Will Of Evil
|

10-28-2004, 09:36 PM
|
|
|
|
Traffic Court Losses
look, i was twisting their words back on them. if a attorney enters a plea of not guilty for me, then, hes saying im not guilty. whats the problem?
|

10-28-2004, 10:01 PM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
|
|
|
Traffic Court Losses
Weis
The court plea not guilty for you, and setup the trial date on Jan,19. The only option you have right now if the police who gave you the citation did'nt show up in court during the triall date as set. You ask the judge to dismiss the case base on absent of the officer. The judge aware of this ruling too.Look into the municipal code of your state. Most of the ruling related to traffic ticket etc are codifeld in the municipal code law. If you didn't show up at the trial date the judge will fine you guilty of non apperance,and will goes straight to your record. In a week or too you will received the bill in the mail for that fine.
__________________
Resolution pending
|

10-29-2004, 01:08 AM
|
|
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California
Posts: 591
|
|
|
Traffic Court Losses
<font color=darkblue face=verdana>Weis,
The battle is far from over.
First, you can appeal to have the plea entered on your behalf withdrawn.
If more than 14 days has passed from the time you were pulled over (arrested) then you can also motion to dismiss based on untimely prosecution after you've been 'held to answer'.
If the arresting officer didn't have probable cause for the stop (which he certainly DIDN'T), then you can file motions to quash all evidence against you due to the 'fruit of the poisonous tree' doctrine.
If there hasn't been an agency determination submitted on the record, then the court has no SMJ due to the failure of the agency to exhaust its administrative remedy, thus depriving you of administrative due process.
The list goes on. Hence, the fight goes on!
-BT[/color]
__________________
"A truth's initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker, a raving lunatic." --Dresden James
|

10-29-2004, 03:34 AM
|
|
|
|
Traffic Court Losses
en: i believe you correct. my reply was simply to point out the words, not necessarily the party using them or the action thereby.
kgodd: a plea is a position, not a final pronouncement of status. only the judge can issue the final pronouncement of status, and the course of action thereafter (in a non-jury trial).
jon
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:31 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
|
|