
04-05-2008, 01:17 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,627
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by farmer_giles_of_ham
actually jealous, or mere envy?
|
I hate to burst your bubble, Farmer, but I really doubt there's anyone who envies you. Of course, I don't know for sure; I've never been to Bengladesh.
|

04-05-2008, 01:24 PM
|
|
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 630
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by farmer_giles_of_ham
Here's the part you missed, next time be more patient and learn about words:
TITLE 40. MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC
CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS O.C.G.A. § 40-1-1 (2007)
(75) "Vehicle" means every device in, upon, or by which any person or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a highway, excepting devices used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks.
plug "automobile" into "device" and check back when you figure out the premise.
|
This is a joke, right? In fact, you're always joking. No one can be as dumb as you come across.
"Every device" looks pretty comprehensive. And as far as people or property being transported...every car I have ever seen had at least one person being transported in it. Those things don't drive themselves.
Anyway, drooler boy, you bear the burden of proof. Cite me a Georgia case that says a regular old car (pickup truck, SUV, whatever) driven by John Q. Citizen is NOT a motor vehicle as that term is used in the Georgia code.
Just one case. Time to put up or shut up.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
Last edited by Lawdog : 04-05-2008 at 01:26 PM.
|

04-05-2008, 01:30 PM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,232
|
|
Friends:
Shoonra, Lawdog, "Karen M" (Aka "Agent" AndyK), "mertens16," Notorial Dissent, and others are TROLLS.
They troll here, in large part, to FEED.

The above depicts "attorney"/"client" "relationship."
The "attorney" is the JACKAL.
A jackal is a DOG.
LawDOG, himself, openly embraces and admits to his species.
Thus the picture.
There is NO WAY to SETTLE anything by responding to trolls.
All it ultimately does is perpetuate their presence in an otherwise fairly peaceful and informative community.
The supposed "experience" gained in exchanging rhetoric with trolls is limited and eventually subject to the law of diminishing returns, as trolls are only here to FEED, and any POINT one makes is of no import to such.
One of their objects is to get people to waste their time and effort by responding to their frivolous trivia.
Lawdog is protege, minion, and agent to ADKISSON JAY D, of  :
As are "Karen M" (Aka "Agent" AndyK), "mertens16," Notorial Dissent, and "Demosthenes."
Note that the Quatloos "logo" is a "Jolly Roger."
Both words are British seaman's slang.
"Roger" refers to buggery.
"Jolly" refers to the one on the giving end of the "Roger."
Lawdog has been banned from this forum as "UGA Lawdog."
"KarenM" is IRS "agent" KAPUST, ANDREW, a protege, colleague, minion, and supporter of
MACNABB, GENET,

who as:

" Demosthenes,"
is the self-proclaimed "moderator" of "Quatloos," and an IRS stool pigeon extraordinaire, as well as a "member" of this website.
(Kapust's paychecks issue from the Department of Agriculture, although he claims that his
International Monetary Fund/Federal Reserve "debt" collection scheme is a "government" entity of the "US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, whose so-called "Secretary" is the foreign District of Columbia's frontman for the IMF.)
Kapust has been banned from this forum as "AndyK."
"Shoonra" is the Anti Defamation Leagues's (Militia Watch DOG Division), SUSSMAN BERNARD J, ostensibly, an "attorney" apparently relegated to fetching anectdotals for "practicing" attorneys, specializing in rogering veterans.
Last edited by mrg : 06-05-2008 at 09:43 AM.
|

04-05-2008, 02:08 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,065
|
|
|
MRG, you are 100% right...
but it sure is fun to piss them off!
|

04-05-2008, 02:18 PM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,232
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by farmer_giles_of_ham
MRG, you are 100% right...
but it sure is fun to piss them off!
|
The only thing is, is that it doesn't.
They are robotic, emotionless foreign agents doing a job.
Their aim is calculated.
Yeah it is fun for awhile, and, I suppose, "educational," but then comes the law of diminishing returns, and with it a certain amount of counterproductivity, which is one of their goals.
|

04-05-2008, 02:19 PM
|
 |
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 676
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shoonra
I cannot find Hamilton or Madison or Jay saying that anyone had a Constitutional right to drive an internal combustion vehicle on city streets.
|
Bernie, this is another post which only negates any credibility some readers may have for your post.
I suggest you check out a timeline on when the Constitution was drafted, when Hamilton, Madison and Jay died and when the internal combustion engine was invented (actually, a better place to start would be the steam engine, but even that won't help your argument).
Obviously, you only present fluff to derail and sidetrack the substance of what has been posted, and as I have come to expect, you have only posted opinion, which does not in any way address the materials I've provided.
__________________
Liberty: Freedom from restraint and the power to follow one's own will to choose a course of conduct. Liberty, like freedom, has its inherent restraint to act without harm to others and within the accepted rules of conduct for the benefit of the general public.
|

04-05-2008, 02:47 PM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,165
|
|
|
research by deduction
That psychological profiling was very edifying for me. I have a recent report of the "S & R" document floating around Congress. Security and Revolution.
Security is to bolster China's confidence in the US dollar, enough to keep them from selling them off. And of course this Security involves the possibility of reneging on US obligations, which might mean some degree of retaliation and war. The Revolution side of this document is that when Paulson gets back from China, the Fed will raise taxes. - And it would be significantly - which might just put the average American over the edge.
However I think this reality will take a while to catch up with the denial and dissociation from reality around Quatloos.
Regards,
David Merrill.
|

04-05-2008, 03:03 PM
|
|
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 630
|
|
|
wise up
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FreeFromContract
Bernie, this is another post which only negates any credibility some readers may have for your post.
I suggest you check out a timeline on when the Constitution was drafted, when Hamilton, Madison and Jay died and when the internal combustion engine was invented (actually, a better place to start would be the steam engine, but even that won't help your argument).
|
Wise up, son. Shoonra is well aware that the Constitution was drafted long before the internal combustion engine was invented.
He was having a little fun at your expense.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
|

04-05-2008, 03:08 PM
|
|
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 630
|
|
|
not a lawyer at all
Lawyerdude would be more properly known as ex-Lawyerdude. His name is Doug Palaschak, and he was disbarred in California. I think it had to do with drug use, but I don't remember for sure.
Anyway, he's an angry crank, just like Robert Clarkson, a former lawyer who got disbarred in South Carolina 30 years ago for pleading guilty to tax related felonies and who subsequently joined the tax protester/tax denier lunatic fringe.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:54 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
|
|