New Yawk Citee Inc.

[andrewmitch]

Use your common sense Lawdog.

You are free to believe in whatever you chose. When did I ever say anything to the contrary? And when did I call you names and insult you the way did to me?

The bottom line is the root of all crime and all sin is when a man or group of men impose their will over another man or group of men. Period.

And that is exactly what government, courts, police, and yes, Members of the BAR do.

All we want to do is to be left alone and yet people like you continue to bother us when when we injured no one. Yes, you will be judged one day. No, I won't be the one who gets to judge. And no, I do not know what the ruling will be. But make no mistake about - you are imposing your will on us and you have been put on notice to simply stop.

Again, it's all a matter of basic common sense.

[Lawdog]

Common sense is one thing wingnuts are severely lacking in.

The difference to which I allude is this:

Exactly what constitutes God's law is a highly debatable subject. The very existence of God is debatable, so one can debate whether there is such a thing as God's law at all. Claiming you want everyone to live by "God's law" invites all sorts of nasty mischief, like religious wars.

Secular law...man's law, on the other hand, is definite and ascertainable. If someone asked me, for example, whether the state of Rhode Island, unlike my home state of Georgia, still recognizes tenancy by the entireties for married persons, I could find that out with access to a good law library, whether electronic or books. And I've never even set foot in Rhode Island.

If you do not want to be governed by the laws of the state in which you live, you need to move. Remaining there is tacit consent. You have 49 other states and a federal district where you can live and still be in the United States.

If the laws of the United States offend you too much, you need to move to any other country that will have you. Again, remaining in this country is tacit consent to be bound by its laws.

The problem many of you have is you want all the benefits of living in this country but don't want to bear any of the burdens, like paying taxes or abiding by laws you don't happen to agree with.

Well, grow up. You're not a whiny teenager anymore, so stop acting like one. Part of being an adult is realizing that the world does not revolve around you and you can't always get your way.

To quote Denis Leary, "So you're not always happy? Join the f***ing club."

Wise up. Butch up. But for Pete's sake, grow up.

[mrg]

Originally Posted by Lawdog
Which version of God's law?

You will know it when it falls on you.

[andrewmitch]

You are such a confused little soul.

And you speak only of man-made entities.

Who said I wanted any of your benefits?

And if we are born free then don't we have a right to live wherever we want? Based on what you are saying we are born into the hands of the state and the only way out of bondage is to leave our birth soil.

Did you not read the opening line of the constitution? What part of "We the People" do you not undertand? Does this not mean Self-goverance? Does self-governance not require mutual consent?

Did you not read the Declaration of Independence? Do you not understand what unalienable rights are? Do you not understand that rights can not be taxed?

Do you not celebrate Independence Day? Do you not get that we are not celebrating consenting with our government rather we are celebrating an act of Treason, Terrorism, and Violence directed at our own government who did not respect the rights of the people. And yes, we even shot at our own people if they did not go along. Think about that the next time you convince one of your clients that your statutory rules are Supreme while they write a check to you with as many zero's as you can get away with.

[mrg]

Lawdog is not free and wants to make sure no one else ever is either.

He seems locked securely away in the prison of his own mind's illusory hall of mirrors, and longs for the companionship of others so conditioned, as well as for the entirety of mankind to be so conditioned.

He cannot, apparently, admit anything that will upset severely limited and handicapped notions of what constitutes either law or reality and will not, apparently, entertain any thought rising above the level of the base and mundane.

He demonstrably refuses to consider the philosophical as having any relationship to his distorted and narrow misconstruance of the nature and facts of actual law.

His teachers lied to him and he cannot afford to admit it and shake it off.

He has bought into it lock stock and barrel, and likely believes there is no way out.

Skurdall was correct; his Grand Inquisitor is precisely that.

Lawdog would submit all to the absolute rule by opinion of the Grand Inquisitor.

This is the only world Lawdog and his BAR fellows know:

[Lawdog]

This is the only world mrg and his buddies will ever know:

http://www.gardensafari.net/edye/gal...121&fullsize=1

[Steel]

was that meant as mean?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...45892024&hl=en
back @ ya with love

[andrewmitch]

I apologize in advanced if I am mistaken here Mr. Lawdog and please by all means correct me if I am wrong but wasn't it you who recently posted on this thread "to grow up" and "to be an adult"?

You are truly a piece of work and are just another soldier working for Tryanny.

Anything tangible can and will be taken away from you one day. Men of God understand there are more important things in this life than tangible possessions.

I won't be responding to your messages any more so save your time and go back to making more money for the BAR.

[aksis]

Originally Posted by Lawdog

Learned authorities (scientists) say the earth is round. Therefore, a flat earther is someone totally out of step with those authorities.

Learned authorities (scientists) say that those lines are imaginary and that we don't live in "imaginary bubbles", but this doesn't seem to cure you and other's like you from your psychosis.... flat earther. Perhaps we should use the term "bubble head"?

[netwrkranger]

Lawdog wrote:
If the laws of the United States offend you too much, you need to move to any other country that will have you. Again, remaining in this country is tacit consent to be bound by its laws.

You have any case cites or historical evidence to this "tacit consent to be bound by its laws" allegation?