Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Travel
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-14-2008, 04:36 PM
freebeme's Avatar
freebeme freebeme is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 208
"Offenses" are Prosecuted Under the King's Prerogative, Now Our Prerogative

"Offenses" are Prosecuted Under the Authority of the King's Prerogative, Now Our Prerogative.

So "offenses" as causes of actions, can only arise between private parties.
__________________
This one is great. What an arse.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldier of Truth
There is no foundation or support for "persons" in the English language, or in the rules of grammar of the English language, any more than it is for one's name to be "correctly" and "properly" spelled IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldier of Truth
I don't utilize strawman theories.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-14-2008, 05:23 PM
freebeme's Avatar
freebeme freebeme is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 208
Schick Vs United States:

"We entertain no doubt that the parties could rightfully make such a waiver and that the judgments are in no way invalidated thereby. It will be noticed that the section characterizes the act prohibited as an offense, and subjects the party to a penalty of $50. So small a penalty for violating a revenue statute indicates only a petty offense. It is not one necessarily involving any moral delinquency. The violation may have been the result of ignorance or thought-lessness and must be classed with such illegal acts as acting as an auctioneer or peddler without a license, or making a deed without affixing the proper stamp. That by other sections of this statute more serious offenses are described, and more grave punishments provided does not lift this one to the dignity of a crime." [195 U.S. 65, 68]
__________________
This one is great. What an arse.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldier of Truth
There is no foundation or support for "persons" in the English language, or in the rules of grammar of the English language, any more than it is for one's name to be "correctly" and "properly" spelled IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldier of Truth
I don't utilize strawman theories.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-15-2008, 08:30 PM
freebeme's Avatar
freebeme freebeme is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 208
When peole understand the differences between a crime and an offense, then people can begin to understand how to defeat charges of committing an offense.

Or if you want to think that the state has made a crime out of your rights by making some actions "offenses" then continue in your mud spinning.

Only a realization of your status and the states status will enable you to recognize administrative law not applicable to you and statutory law that is definitive of the common law and applicable to all.

However without this knowledge I doubt very seriously that more then a handful of people will experience actual working remedy.
__________________
This one is great. What an arse.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldier of Truth
There is no foundation or support for "persons" in the English language, or in the rules of grammar of the English language, any more than it is for one's name to be "correctly" and "properly" spelled IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldier of Truth
I don't utilize strawman theories.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-18-2008, 04:32 AM
farmer_giles_of_ham farmer_giles_of_ham is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 744
OK, then. What is the fraud being applied on so many otherwise inapplicable cases? How is it plead, and how is this proffering overcome?

Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeme
Only a realization of your status and the states status will enable you to recognize administrative law not applicable to you and statutory law that is definitive of the common law and applicable to all.

what status? Is it absolute, or conditional- meaning something I am, or something I did?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-18-2008, 07:53 AM
freebeme's Avatar
freebeme freebeme is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 208
Your status is your right to be held to answer for the commission of crimes only versus "offenses."

Look at the penal code table of contents.

Quote:
TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE OF THE ACT .................................................. ... 1
THE PENAL CODE OF CALIFORNIA
PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS ............................................... 2-24
PART 1. OF CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS
TITLE 1. OF PERSONS LIABLE TO PUNISHMENT FOR CRIME ................ 25-29
TITLE 2. OF PARTIES TO CRIME ...................................... 30-33
TITLE 3. OF OFFENSES AGAINST THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE STATE ......... 37-38
TITLE 5. OF CRIMES BY AND AGAINST THE EXECUTIVE POWER OF THE STATE 67-77
TITLE 6. OF CRIMES AGAINST THE LEGISLATIVE POWER .................. 85-88
TITLE 7. OF CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC JUSTICE
CHAPTER 1. BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION ................................ 92-100
CHAPTER 2. RESCUES ............................................... 102
CHAPTER 3. ESCAPES AND AIDING THEREIN ........................... 107-110
CHAPTER 4. FORGING, STEALING, MUTILATING, AND FALSIFYING
JUDICIAL AND PUBLIC RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS ............ 112-117
CHAPTER 5. PERJURY AND SUBORNATION OF PERJURY ................... 118-131
CHAPTER 6. FALSIFYING EVIDENCE, AND BRIBING, INFLUENCING,
INTIMIDATING OR THREATENING WITNESSES ................ 132-141
CHAPTER 7. OTHER OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC JUSTICE ................ 142-181
CHAPTER 8. CONSPIRACY ........................................... 182-185
CHAPTER 9. CRIMINAL PROFITEERING .............................. 186-186.8
CHAPTER 10. MONEY LAUNDERING ............................... 186.9-186.10
CHAPTER 10.5. FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT: VICTIM RESTITUTION ........ 186.11
CHAPTER 11. STREET TERRORISM ENFORCEMENT AND PREVENTION
ACT ........................................... 186.20-186.33
TITLE 8. OF CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON
CHAPTER 1. HOMICIDE ............................................. 187-199
CHAPTER 2. MAYHEM ............................................. 203-206.1
CHAPTER 3. KIDNAPPING ........................................... 207-210
CHAPTER 3.5. HOSTAGES ............................................ 210.5
CHAPTER 4. ROBBERY .............................................. 211-215
CHAPTER 5. ATTEMPTS TO KILL ................................. 217.1-219.3
CHAPTER 6. ASSAULTS WITH INTENT TO COMMIT FELONY, OTHER THAN
ASSAULTS WITH INTENT TO MURDER ....................... 220-222
CHAPTER 8. FALSE IMPRISONMENT ................................... 236-237
CHAPTER 9. ASSAULT AND BATTERY .................................. 240-248
TITLE 9. OF CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON INVOLVING SEXUAL
ASSAULT, AND CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC DECENCY AND GOOD
MORALS
CHAPTER 1. RAPE, ABDUCTION, CARNAL ABUSE OF CHILDREN, AND
SEDUCTION ............................................ 261-269
CHAPTER 2. ABANDONMENT AND NEGLECT OF CHILDREN ............... 270-273.75
CHAPTER 2.5. SPOUSAL ABUSERS ............................... 273.8-273.88
CHAPTER 4. CHILD ABDUCTION ...................................... 277-280
CHAPTER 5. BIGAMY, INCEST, AND THE CRIME AGAINST NATURE ....... 281-289.6
CHAPTER 5.5. SEX OFFENDERS ...................................... 290-294
CHAPTER 6. DNA AND FORENSIC IDENTIFICATION DATA BASE AND
DATA BANK ACT OF 1998
Article 1. Purpose and Administration ........................ 295-295.1
Article 2. Offenders Subject to Sample Collection ............ 296-296.2
Article 3. Data Base Applications ............................... 297
Article 4. Collection and Forwarding of Samples .............. 298-298.3
Article 5. Expungement of Information ........................... 299
Article 6. Limitations on Disclosure ....................... 299.5-299.7
Article 7. Construction and Severability ..................... 300-300.3
CHAPTER 7. OF CRIMES AGAINST RELIGION AND CONSCIENCE, AND
OTHER OFFENSES AGAINST GOOD MORALS ................. 302-310.5
CHAPTER 7.5. OBSCENE MATTER ................................... 311-312.7
CHAPTER 7.6. HARMFUL MATTER ................................... 313-313.5
CHAPTER 8. INDECENT EXPOSURE, OBSCENE EXHIBITIONS, AND BAWDY
AND OTHER DISORDERLY HOUSES ........................ 314-318.6
CHAPTER 9. LOTTERIES ............................................ 319-329
CHAPTER 10. GAMING ............................................. 330-337z
CHAPTER 10.5. HORSE RACING .................................. 337.1-337.9
CHAPTER 11. PAWNBROKERS .......................................... 343
CHAPTER 12. OTHER INJURIES TO PERSONS ........................... 346-368
TITLE 10. OF CRIMES AGAINST THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY ....... 369a-402c
TITLE 11. OF CRIMES AGAINST THE PUBLIC PEACE ................... 403-420.1
TITLE 11.5. CRIMINAL THREATS ................................... 422-422.1
TITLE 11.6. CIVIL RIGHTS
CHAPTER 1. DEFINITIONS .................................... 422.55-422.57
CHAPTER 2. CRIMES AND PENALTIES ........................... 422.6-422.865
CHAPTER 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS ............................ 422.88-422.93
TITLE 11.7. CALIFORNIA FREEDOM OF ACCESS TO CLINIC AND CHURCH
ENTRANCES ACT ...................................... 423-423.6
TITLE 12. OF CRIMES AGAINST THE REVENUE AND PROPERTY OF THIS STATE 424-440
TITLE 13. OF CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY
CHAPTER 1. ARSON .............................................. 450-457.1
CHAPTER 2. BURGLARY ............................................. 458-464
CHAPTER 3. BURGLARIOUS AND LARCENOUS INSTRUMENTS AND DEADLY
WEAPONS .............................................. 466-469
CHAPTER 4. FORGERY AND COUNTERFEITING ......................... 470-483.5
CHAPTER 5. LARCENY ............................................ 484-502.9
CHAPTER 6. EMBEZZLEMENT ......................................... 503-515
CHAPTER 7. EXTORTION ............................................ 518-527
CHAPTER 8. FALSE PERSONATION AND CHEATS ......................... 528-539
CHAPTER 10. CRIMES AGAINST INSURED PROPERTY AND INSURERS ........ 548-551
CHAPTER 12. UNLAWFUL INTERFERENCE WITH PROPERTY
Article 1. Trespassing or Loitering Near Posted Industrial
Property .......................................... 552-555.5
Article 2. Unlawfully Placing Signs on Public and Private
Property .......................................... 556-556.4
Article 3. Trespass on Property Belonging to the University
of California ..................................... 558-558.1
CHAPTER 12.5. CRIMES INVOLVING BAILMENTS ...................... 560-560.6
CHAPTER 12.6. CRIMES INVOLVING BRANDED CONTAINERS, CABINETS,
__________________
This one is great. What an arse.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldier of Truth
There is no foundation or support for "persons" in the English language, or in the rules of grammar of the English language, any more than it is for one's name to be "correctly" and "properly" spelled IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldier of Truth
I don't utilize strawman theories.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-18-2008, 08:13 AM
farmer_giles_of_ham farmer_giles_of_ham is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 744
Quote:
Your status is your right to be held to answer for the commission of crimes only versus "offenses."

Legislative "criminal offenses" exist. How does one traverse these enactments?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-18-2008, 02:58 PM
moishanb moishanb is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Right here
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeme
"Offenses" are Prosecuted Under the Authority of the King's Prerogative, Now Our Prerogative.

So "offenses" as causes of actions, can only arise between private parties.

So, "offenses" as causes from actions, can only arize between private parties, and those private parties are simply legal fictions in todays system, therefore, the quote above states that legal fictions can be offended.

Fiction = False
Fictional action
Fictional offense

Please correct me if I am misusing the quote from above, or, there is something I am missing from this.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-18-2008, 05:34 PM
freebeme's Avatar
freebeme freebeme is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by moishanb
So, "offenses" as causes from actions, can only arize between private parties, and those private parties are simply legal fictions in todays system, therefore, the quote above states that legal fictions can be offended.

moishanb, even I have studying to do and do not know al of the answers. However I believe that "offenses" were traditionally heard as the King's private law. I do not believe that they were heard in the court of common pleas. I know many were heard in the court of exchequer which was a civil court EVEN THOUGH THE CLAIMS WERE FOR THE KING. This would include forfeitures and the whole gambit.

An offense is not indictable. It is almost always an activity that can be licensed.

My research and thinking has led me to believe that every use of a license creates a bill attainder every time if the license is attempted to be imposed on the natural, private man.

Offenses carry no power to punish for the behavior is not "bad or wrong."

Absent a showing that the activity is "wrong" then the state cannot rightfully claim to regulate that activity under the power to protect its people (police power).

Anyway, you seem genuinely interested. Send me an email and I will provide a better insight into what I have compiled. freebeme@live.com
__________________
This one is great. What an arse.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldier of Truth
There is no foundation or support for "persons" in the English language, or in the rules of grammar of the English language, any more than it is for one's name to be "correctly" and "properly" spelled IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldier of Truth
I don't utilize strawman theories.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-18-2008, 06:16 PM
ThomPaine ThomPaine is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Repulik of Georgia
Posts: 348
Freebeme,

I agree whole heartedly with what you are saying and though its not brain surgery, many fail to make the connection.

If you apply for/sign for a "driving license" or permit, then you are, by default, obligated to follow the rules that regulate that priviledge. Its a contract. If you break one of the rules, you have violated the contract. It is no different than being reprimanded at school or at work, you are playing in their ballfield by their rules.

If you desire not to be a subject of the King, that is your choice and you are free to be your own King.
__________________
Blowing down the house of cards, one puff at a time.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-28-2008, 03:31 PM
FreeFromContract's Avatar
FreeFromContract FreeFromContract is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 716
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThomPaine
Freebeme,

I agree whole heartedly with what you are saying and though its not brain surgery, many fail to make the connection.

If you apply for/sign for a "driving license" or permit, then you are, by default, obligated to follow the rules that regulate that priviledge. Its a contract. If you break one of the rules, you have violated the contract. It is no different than being reprimanded at school or at work, you are playing in their ballfield by their rules.

If you desire not to be a subject of the King, that is your choice and you are free to be your own King.

Even with the license, the administrative agencies often violate their own rules and rules of due process.
__________________
Liberty: Freedom from restraint and the power to follow one's own will to choose a course of conduct. Liberty, like freedom, has its inherent restraint to act without harm to others and within the accepted rules of conduct for the benefit of the general public.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"SOVEREIGN", "PERSON", "ENTITY" or "INDIVIDUAL"? Bulletproof Monk Citizenship & Jurisdiction 34 03-15-2008 11:07 AM
"Assignment" of Debt after Discharge "Charge-Off" onemaster Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 11 06-13-2007 05:21 PM
"Speeding" and "driving" w/o Insurance Dismissed! ISAIAH Success Stories 14 12-12-2006 07:47 PM
"No Seatbelt? Lose Your Student ID?", Or, "Would you like some free ringtones?" fulltitle End Days of America 10 10-14-2006 02:35 AM
"Deed of Trust" & "Contracts 'Under' Seal" fulltitle Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 0 07-01-2005 04:56 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:23 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2007 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer