Signing Tickets under duress

[KITCHIE]

Weis-

I still do not have the exact legal take on why this works. I did however get some aluminum "plates" made cuz the decal in the window is hard to see.

The best I can tell is that federal law says you need a driver license and registration because you are using the public highway and roads for monetary gain. Therefore if you want the privilage of using the roads for capital gain you sign up the the DMV who keeps track of that. The states are bound by the fed law cuz they get fed money for streets and highways.

My "Notice" in the window says its registered with the Sec of State and its PRIVATE NOT FOR HIRE.

Your UCCFS is the strongest contract on the planet and they (gov) can't trespass on it. Very bad juju if you trespass on UCC.

My doubting friend is now trying to figure out what stops the cops from stoping me!

Kitchie

kitchie, you are saying that a ucc-3 with your vehicle on its covers the registration with the state. ok, lets say i do a default with the dmv or a affidavit into the public record that im not using the highway for gain. that notice and or the default with dmv, plus the ucc registration and a private bond for insurance (just to cover that) lawfully prohibits the cops for pulling me over?

[Wormwood]

I just went to the DMV of State of WASHINGTON (the corporation), not Washington state the republic, (the all CAP name is big clue to who you are dealing with) to make a new contract with DMV. I waited till the my old licence had expiered so the old contract had ended. For the new contract, in the signature line(box) I wrote in "without prejudice UCC1-207" this is to reserve all of my common law rights becuase I am signing an adhesion contract and the DMV has not fully disclosed all of the implacations of the Contract, and If they did I would be signing under duress. The clerk just said " I don't think you can do that" It is now on my temp License. But now I can us this as evidence in court that I've keeped my common law right to travel.

For more information from people smarter than me and out of the matrix.

http://www.americanradioshow.us/
http://www.originalintent.org/
http://www.infowars.com/
http://usa-the-republic.com/jurispru.../travel_2.html

Signing under duress will give you more leverage to dispute at a later time.
You should follow up on that by writing across the ticket with red ink( pref.)
rejected and put the date on it.
You have 72 hours to send it back to the Court.
That ticket is a contract,it will put you under corporate jurisdiction.
Rejection the offer is part of the contracting process.

If you want to stay out of THEIR Corporate jurisdiction for sure you have to
serve THEM with an affidavit of corporate denial.

Remember,THEY always look at you as being a corporation or PERSON.
After all this is society is a piece of some ones property.
If we do not object to it or fight back,we are what THEY think we are.

See yo!!
______________________________

"...and when I was born I had my natural rights with me..."

Adrian

[800NEWDOLLAR]

Hello group, I am new to this law stuff and I am due to renew in April 2008. I have decided not to renew my DL. I have went two years without being pulled over and without a license. But in court they took me as a felon and a kook. My question is how this group will handle this new National Id, with check points and jail for those that do not have it. I also read that you will not be able to open a bank account nor buy food or operate in the commercial codes without this ID. I am stashing silver in various places but if in jail, silver will do me little good, since it is not legal tender and most of the time it is a barter situation to get gas and beer with silver pieces. Any thoughts on the coming problem.
May I post off subject? NON-ALLEGIANCE TO BUSH IS TERRORISM! READ TORTURE BILL Facts....Subsection 4(b) (26) of section 950v. of HR 6166 Sates; "Any person subject to this chapter who, in breach of an allegiance or duty to the United States , knowingly and intentionally aids an enemy of the United States, or one of the co-belligerents of the enemy, shall be punished as a military commission under this chapter may direct."

For an individual to hold an allegiance or duty to the United States they need to be a citizen of the United States. Why would a foreign terrorist have any allegiance to the United States to breach in the first place?
This is another telltale facet that proves the bill applies to U.S. citizens and includes them under the "enemy combatant" designation. Previously cited comments of Yale law Professor Bruce Ackerman, who wrote in the L.A. Times ,

"The compromise legislation....authorizes the president to seize American citizens as enemy combatants, even if they have never left the United States. And once thrown into military prison, they cannot expect a trial by their peers or any other of the normal protections of the Bill of Rights."

The New York Times stated that the legislation introduced, "A dangerously broad definition of “illegal enemy combatant” in the bill could subject legal residents of the United States, as well as foreign citizens living in their own countries, to summary arrest and indefinite detention with no hope of appeal. The president could give the power to apply this label to anyone he wanted."

Calling the bill "our generation's version of the Alien and Sedition Acts," the Times goes on to highlight the rubber stamping of torture.

"Coerced evidence would be permissible if a judge considered it reliable — already a contradiction in terms — and relevant. Coercion is defined in a way that exempts anything done before the passage of the 2005 Detainee Treatment Act, and anything else Mr. Bush chooses."

Since with this bill, in the aggregate, Bush has declared himself to be above the Constitution and the laws of the United States, the allegiance of American citizens is no longer to the flag or the freedoms for which it stands, but to Bush himself, the self-appointed dictator, and any diversion from that allegiance will mandate arrest, torture and conviction in a military tribunal under the terms of this bill.

Since I am new and should post a new tread please forgive my lack of experience.

[fulltitle]

Originally Posted by adnnxu

Signing under duress will give you more leverage to dispute at a later time.
You should follow up on that by writing across the ticket with red ink( pref.)
rejected and put the date on it.
You have 72 hours to send it back to the Court.
That ticket is a contract,it will put you under corporate jurisdiction.
Rejection the offer is part of the contracting process.

If you want to stay out of THEIR Corporate jurisdiction for sure you have to
serve THEM with an affidavit of corporate denial.

Remember,THEY always look at you as being a corporation or PERSON.
After all this is society is a piece of some ones property.
If we do not object to it or fight back,we are what THEY think we are.

See yo!!
______________________________

"...and when I was born I had my natural rights with me..."

Adrian

Without Prejudice.
If the DMV clerk kvetches, just send a notice of your state of mind to the SoS and the DMV via registered mail and carry a copy with you. And file it into court cases. Easy.

Originally Posted by 800NEWDOLLAR

Hello group, I am new to this law stuff and I am due to renew in April 2008. I have decided not to renew my DL. I have went two years without being pulled over and without a license. But in court they took me as a felon and a kook.

Try a motorist qualification card. Make sure the old License is surrendered. Write the SoS and DMV let them know that you never intended to contract with them and that you never used the roads for commerca and that ignorance of the certain officials posed a threat of kidnapping and that you never waived any rights or anything..duress. Maybe file the letter with the county.

I also read that you will not be able to open a bank account nor buy food or operate in the commercial codes without this ID.

I also read read Spiderm4n could shoot webs and swing from skyscrapers.

May I post off subject? NON-ALLEGIANCE TO BUSH IS TERRORISM! READ TORTURE BILL Facts....Subsection 4(b) (26) of section 950v. of HR 6166 Sates; "Any person subject to this chapter who, in breach of an allegiance or duty to the United States , knowingly and intentionally aids an enemy of the United States, or one of the co-belligerents of the enemy, shall be punished as a military commission under this chapter may direct."

Know who you are, establish on solid foundations and... dont waiver.

Why would a foreign terrorist have any allegiance to the United States to breach in the first place?

Fancy this: 'citizenship' by 'declaration' and presumption as the chariots come a' rollin' through with a man declaring everyone he passes to be a 'citizen' (the Romans did this). So unless...you rebut it...well you know.

[charlesa6]

800NEWDOLLAR, welcome to the suijuris forum.