The right to travel

This might be help. I know my brother used it once and it worked great. I personally have a bumper sticker that says " private property for private use only. NO TRASSPASSING " and when I was stoped the officer approached my car and just gave me a warning. I knew that the sign would forbid public servants from searching your vihicle but I had no clue it would stop a traffic ticket....any way I got the following off of this http://www.stanley2002.org/righttodrive.htm

Hope it helps.

COMMON LAW VEHICULAR JUDICIAL NOTICE CONSTITUTIONAL DRIVERS LICENSE

THE UNDERSIGNED Common Law Citizen__________________: hereby Certifies, by Rights Secured under provisions of the Constitution of the United States of America, the Constitution of the several states. Common Law, Nature and Laws of Natures GOD, that these Rights are retained in FEE SIMPLE ABSOLUTE, and held and protected with special regard to Rights designated and/or set forth as follows: ALSO NOTE Rights and Property are ONE AND THE SAME THING-by the Honorable Justice LOUIS BRANDIS U.S. SUPREME COURT. NOTICE AND ADVISORY OF RIGHTS CLAIMED INVIOLATE:
1) The Right to TRAVEL FREELY, UNENCUMBERED, and UNFETTERED is guaranteed as a RIGHT and not a mere privilege. That the Right to TRAVEL is such a BASIC RIGHT it does NOT even need to be mentioned for it is SELF-evident by Common Sense that the Right to TRAVEL is a BASIC CONCOMMITANT of a FREE Society to come and go from length and breath FREELY UNENCUMBERED and UNFETTERED distinguishes the characteristic required for a FREE PEOPLE TO EXIST IN FACT. Please See SHAPIRO vs. THOMSON, 394 U. S. 618 . Further, the Right to TRAVEL by private conveyance for private purposes upon the Common way can NOT BE INFRINGED. No license or permission is required for TRAVEL when such TRAVEL IS NOT for the purpose of (COMMERCIAL] PROFIT OR GAIN on the open highways operating under license IN COMMERCE. The above named Common Law Citizen listed IS NOT OPERATING IN COMMERCE and as such is thereby EXEMPTED FROM THE REQUIREMENT OF A LICENSE AS SUCH. Further, the ___________________ state, is FORBIDDEN BY LAW from converting a BASIC RIGHT into a PRIVILEGE and requiring a LICENSE and or a FEE CHARGED for the exercise of the BASIC RIGHT. Please SEE MURDOCKvs. PENNSYLVANIA, 319 U.S. 105, and if________________, state does ERRONIOUSLY convert BASIC RIGHTS into PRIVILEGES and require a License or FEE a Citizen may IGNORE THE LICENSE OR FEE WITH TOTAL IMMUNITY FOR SUCH EXERCISE OF A BASIC RIGHT. Please see Schuttlesworth vs. BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA, 373 U.S. 262. Now if a Citizen exercises a BASIC RIGHT and a Law of ANY state is to the contrary of such exercise of that BASIC RIGHT, the said supposed Law of ANY state is a FICTION OF LAW and 100% TOTALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL and NO COURTS ARE BOUND TO UPHOLD IT AND NO Citizen is REQUIRED TO OBEY SUCH UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW OR LICENSE REQUIREMENT. Please see MARBURY vs. MADISON, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), which has never been overturned in over 194 years, see Shephard's Citations. Now further, if a Citizen relies in good faith on the advice of Counsel and or on the Decisions of the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT that Citizen has a PERFECT DEFENSE to the element of WILLFULNESS and since the burden of proof of said WILLFULNESS is on the Prosecution to prove beyond a REASONABLE DOUBT, said task or burden being totally impossible to specifically perform there is NO CAUSE OF ACTION FOR WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED BY A COURT OF LAW. Please see U.S. vs. Bishop 412 U.S. 346 . OBVIOUSLY THERE IS NO LAWFUL CHARGE AGAINST EXERCISING A BASIC Right to TRAVEL for a regular Common Law Citizen NOT IN COMMERCE on the common way Public HIGHWAY. THAT IS THE LAW!!! The above named Citizen IS IMMUNE FROM ANY CHARGE TO THE CONTRARY AND ANY PARTY MAKING SUCH CHARGE SHOULD BE DULY WARNED OF THE TORT OF TRESPASS!!! YOU ARE TRESPASSING ON THIS Common Law Citizen!!! 2) The original and Judicial jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court is ALL actions in which a State may be party, thru subdivision, political or trust. This includes ALL state approved subdivisions and/or INCORPORATED Cities, Townships, Municipalities, and Villages, EtAI. Please see Article 3, Section 2, Para. (1) and (2), U.S. Constitution.

3) The undersigned has NEVER willingly and knowingly entered into ANY Contract or Contractual agreement giving up ANY Constitutional Rights which are secured by the CONSTITUTION, the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. This Common Law Citizen has NOT harmed any party, has NOT threatened any party, and that includes has NOT threatened or caused any endangerment to the safety or well being of any party and would leave any claimant otherwise to their strictest proofs otherwise IN A COURT OF LAW. The above named Citizen is merely exercising the BASIC RIGHT TO TRAVEL UNENCUMBERED and UNFETTERED on the Common public way or highway, which is their RIGHT TO SO DO!!! Please see Zobel vs. Williams, 457 U.S. 55, held the RIGHT TO TRAVEL is Constitutionally PROTECTED!!
4) Conversion of the RIGHT TO TRAVEL into a PRIVILEGE and or CRIME is A FRAUD and is in clear and direct conflict with she UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. LAWS made by any state, which are clearly in direct CONFLICT or REPUGNANCY are UNCONSTITUTIONAL and are NOT WITH STANDING IN LAW AND ARE BEING CHALLENGED AS SUCH HERE AND THEREBY ARE NULL AND VOID OF LAW ON THEIR FACE. NO COURTS ARE BOUND TO UPHOLD SUCH FICTIONS OF LAW AND NO Citizen is bound to obey such a FICTION OF LAW. SUCH REGULATION OR LAW OPERATES AS A MERE NULLITY OR FICTION OF LAW AS IF IT NEVER EXISTED IN LAW. No CITIZEN IS BOUND TO OBEY SUCH UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW!!!!!
5) The payment for a privilege requires a benefit to be received As the RIGHT TO TRAVEL is already secured it is clearly unlawful to cite any charges without direct damage to the specific party. Nor may a Citizen be charged with an offense for the exercise of a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, in this case the RIGHT TO TRAVEL. Please see Miller vs. UNITED STATES 230 F2d 486. Nor may a Citizen be denied DUE PROCESS OF LAW or EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW.
6) The undersigned does hereby claim, declare, and certify ANY AND ALL their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS INVIOLATE from GOD and secured in THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION and the CONSTITUTION OF THE state wherein they abode as a SOVEREIGN, COMMON LAW CITIZEN existing and acting entirely AT THE COMMON LAW, and retains ALL BASIC RIGHTS under the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATURE AND NATURE'S GOD AND UNDER THE LAWS OF GOD THE SUPREME LAW GIVER. 7) ANY VIOLATOR OF THE ABOVE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND CLAIM IS CRIMINALLY TRESPASSING UPON THIS ABOVE NAMED COMMON LAW Citizen and WILL BE PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT UNDER THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. BE WARNED OF THE TRESPASS AND THE ATTACHED CAVEATS. ALSO TAKE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE, IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NOT AN EXCUSE!! SIGNATURE OF THE ABOVE NOTED Common Law Citizen is signed___________________
WITNESS__________________ Date______
WITNESS___________________ Date______

[charlesa6]

Thanks for the info.

[idknow]

[quote=SUSANMORGAN]This might be help. I know my brother used it once and it worked great. I personally have a bumper sticker that says " private property for private use only. NO TRASSPASSING " and when I was stoped the officer approached my car and just gave me a warning. I knew that the sign would forbid public servants from searching your vihicle but I had no clue it would stop a traffic ticket....any way I got the following off of this http://www.stanley2002.org/righttodrive.htm

Hope it helps.

to request the DVD, send me a private message.

Seminar Information Lawful Assembly Productions presents: Our duty of movement on the common ways (roads)

Questionarre:
1) Does your religious or world view demand that you come out of 'Babylon', 'The Beast', 'Egypt', or the 'clutches of slavery' commercially or otherwise?
2) Do you recognize any clutches of slavery in your life?
3) Has your present state of servitude you are in left you wondering if the Allmighty has left you with no way to follow through with the directive to come out and be seperate?
4) Has a command been given without the means to obey?
5) Would you like to learn how certain men declare they legally and/or lawfully use the public right-of-way without volunteering to commercial slavery or contracting with the 'State' through State 'Driver's liscence and State 'vehicle registration?
6) Would you like to learn how you also can communicate to the corporation known as 'THE STATE OF...' in your area in these and many other important arenas and get relief BEFORE the trouble comes using the Administrative Remedies presently available to you according to 'THE LAW'?

The Guest speakers:
Nikki Herrington - Come hear how Nikki communicated to all the 'head honcho's' in Arkansas including getting a written opinion from the Attorney General concerning the travel issue. Hear Nikki tell how he made his own 'plate' for his automobile, his own travellers identification (instead of a liscence) and obtained the agreement from all of those in Arkansas 'govt.' and even sued and got his homemade plate returned to him after it was stolen by an uneducated official.
Rick Ertle - Come hear how Rick Ertle has adressed the commercial 'beast' of today sojourning upon these 'right of ways' as an Ambassador. Hear how Rick answers the questions removing any claim of the State on the vessel (his body) that he dedicated to the Creator of heaven and Earth.

Jerry Kirk - Come hear how Jerry learned to regain his sovereignty and how he has successfully uses the restrictions and decisions of the present day 'Supreme Court' against those who have attempted to ensnare him. JERRY DOES NOT HAVE A STATE PLATE OR STATE DRIVERS LICENSE AT ALL, AND ALL THE COPS IN THE 4 COUNTY AREA HE LIVES IN HE SAYS ABSOLUTELY WONT TOUCH HIM, AND LEAVE HIM ALONE! Jerry claims he has used the principles in Supreme Court cases to get computers, office space, secretaries etc..(whatever the prosecutor has to his availability) in his own cases.

Mystery Guest: Come hear our mystery guest (still unconfirmed) speak of a process using a procedure in Title 8 of the United States Code to expatyriate legally from the corporate United States and live as a free man here in America

Cost: If you can afford to do so will be 4 ounces of silver (or corporation notes equaling the same amount) A free will offering may be taken if the size of the attendance does not cover the expenses of our speakers and the paperwork and materials handed out.

[artificialsteve]

I remember someone posted that they had put a decal on the back of their truck which said "Not For Hire" and that was supposed to imply that they 'were not driving in commerce,' and somehow this is what everyone getting certain traffic violations is not seeing.

My question is this, and I'm sorry if I am merely rehashing common knowlege, but WHO IS NOT FOR HIRE?
Is it Myself, the real human?
Is it My ficticious 'DBA' created driver's license thats making me liable?
Is it my car/vehicle/vessle/ship/equity/?

I remember seeing this when I was younger, it had to have been in the late 80's, now I can see what they were getting at.

If I am not for hire, and not actively engaged in commercial activities, than how could i 'get' a traffic violation, or to put it more accurately a "Traffic Stop/with FEE imposed"one which is predicated on all of these presumptions. . There is so much unspoken action happening too. The police officer wants me to tacitly admit that I am engaged in commercial driving, for profit, so he just simply refuses to acknowlege that any of my various 'ploys' are legally valid. Such as reserving my rights w/ signature. The police officer is pretending FOR me, by looking at the flesh and blood human and in a very 'serious' manner, assuming that I care about the trouble my 'dba' WA state card gets itself in, and that all of 'laws I am in violation of will be considered AS VALID LAWS(we know they aren't, do we have to make it clear then, at the time of being pulled over? Furthermore, can a police officer get jurisdiction, if you for example, were to not say a word at all, or sign anything. Couldn't I feasibly "coerce" a police officer, trick him into giving me JURISDICTION OVER HIM/her? Through the use of verbal agreements, tacit admittance, and the like??
There are too many different ways the whole "sovereign traveller" experience may manifest.
Being pulled over is basically fruad, because you are being denied your rights without a valid claim/cause. You are being kidnapped when they take you away, look at Black's 5th. These are obviously serious offences, so why aren't smart people using this to beat their tickets, but also sue for damages related to being kidnapped, held against one's will, robbery w/ a deadly weapon (The search and seizure of personal belongings, which is) Stupid hypocritical double standards.