ucc traveling court question

its my understanding you can take control of the "strawman". if i had control of my all caps name and a cop gave me a ticket with my all caps name could i sue him. if so how would you do it.

thanks,
fd

[fulltitle]

WITHOUT PREJUDICE
If the strawman's name is JOHN HENRY DOE. How does one arrive at the notion that their name is also JOHN HENRY DOE. Is the strawman you? Is the strawman's name your name? I think folks are getting in trouble because they arent studying, learning and holding a consistent line of thought.

1) If you are not the strawman but yet the strawman's name is "your name" then what gives?
2) If Sara and Jerry of the Doe family had a child and they named him "John Henry", is his name John Henry or John Henry Doe?

And so on. In reply to your question, I would suggest much study.

[dadmoonbunny]

Originally Posted by fd3s

its my understanding you can take control of the "strawman". if i had control of my all caps name and a cop gave me a ticket with my all caps name could i sue him. if so how would you do it.

thanks,
fd

About taking control of the strawman, or about going after the enforcement person?

UCC-1 financing statement for the first one, and Why bother for the second. If your study habits and memory are up to snuff, you can go into their court, whip them until they run away with tail between legs and walk out with case dismissed for lack of...

[2501]

I did the same thing Dadmoonbunny said but without the ucc-1.
Just a common law copyright!

after 1 1/2 years of notifying all senders:Return To Sender: Not Properly Addressed

I had expected them to return the mail or resend the mail with a questionair attached asking for my proper address. They never did. They must not be interested in properly addressing me.

All they want is the colorable person's name. . It also states that that JOHN HENRY DOE is not real but a fiction and further states that the fiction is mine. It also states that use must be with written permissionfrom me and a include a deposit with me for twice the value.

Two and one half months after appearing in their court (and making lots of mistakes) I realized that they contracted with my father for the securing of my fiction to appear in court on that date. That date had passed months ago. I was still recieving mail weekly from the 'judge' and 'public pretender'. So I decided to send a clarification notice by registered mail asking who was it they wanted to appear on that date (which at this point was months ago, and I was there) John: Doe or JOHN DOE my copyrighted fiction? BTW, all mail is recieved by me at the general post now. And I've never had a problem. The only thing that sometimes gives me a problem is having to educate the postal workers that they cannot force me to have a zip code. I tell them it's volunatary they say no it's not. I say yes it is you have to respect my mailing information just like I respect yours. If I have to go to another post I will. I say the place I live in does not have zip codes. Zip codes are federal identifiers and since I don't live in a federal place why would I identify me using federal identifiers? They very quickly become your friend after you've stood up for your information. Other times I simply say I do not use zip codes! Or, I am zip code exempt. I always to make shure to thank them too. If you want more info on the copyright I used pm me for details. 2501

[idknow]

BTW, all mail is recieved by me at the general post now. And I've never had a problem. The only thing that sometimes gives me a problem is having to educate the postal workers that they cannot force me to have a zip code. I tell them it's volunatary they say no it's not. I say yes it is you have to respect my mailing information just like I respect yours. If I have to go to another post I will. I say the place I live in does not have zip codes. Zip codes are federal identifiers and since I don't live in a federal place why would I identify me using federal identifiers? They very quickly become your friend after you've stood up for your information. Other times I simply say I do not use zip codes! Or, I am zip code exempt. I always to make shure to thank them too. If you want more info on the copyright I used pm me for details. 2501[/quote]


Not to minimise the prior material that you wrote, it's all education to me, but I need to know more about General delivery. the local usps customer service manager and certain of the from desk personnel are completely disobedient to what general delivery is and they (years ago) refused to allow me to have 'will call' mail for more than a few months. i dont know why they stopped other than that the manager i refered to above wasnt nice to me at all and he poisoned several transitional postmasters to get his way.

As it is now, a few years later since general delivery, the usps is now losing my mail: bill payments and one package to the superior court of pennsylvania.

Anyway, all comments, cites, pointers, urls, etc are welcomed by all.

thanks much.

[2501]

Sorry don't know much about the General delivery except that when I use general post> the people at the post always say that my mail sits right next to the mail for the General delivery. So if there is somebody new working there I can tell them where to begin to look for my mail. I do remember when I first started using general post years ago...they always tried to convince me that I wanted General delivery. Since I knew that was not the case I would insist, and they acted like they had never heard of general post (so I had to explain it all everytime). It's kinda funny now to look back on all the times people say that kind of stuff like it is really true and hoping the whole time you don't know it is not. I will give them the benefit of the doubt however, besides when I ask to speak with the postmaster general they alsways know about it. Since then over the years I've met folks from all over some older folks from different states in the midwest who have been using general post since they were little kids.

[logos]

2501,

What's the difference between General Delivery and General Post?

Where can one find more info on this?

thanks

[2501]

Logos,
general post-office
It is essential for the success of your abatement that you go through the general post-office.
Going through the general post-office is more than having your matter posted there. It is a political question which must be resolved, using the proper tools of Law available: negotiation, reprisal and war.(46) The reasons for this become apparent when you begin to realize specifically what the general post-office is. It is more than a mailing location; it is more than just a place to pickup your mail. It is a political duty--involving a court in which you, acting Ambassador for Our Sovereign Lord and Saviour Jesus, the Christ, represent Him and His Law here on earth. We make no apologies for this attitude. This is the Truth of the matter, regardless of what any attorney tells you. Following this introduction are all the maxims of Law used in the abatements with which you should become very familiar.
The general post-office cannot be denied to any bondservant of Christ operating outside of a commercial venue. The evidence of this is in the fact that the general post-office has never been attached to any legislation through commercial statutes.
On July 1st, 1863, free city delivery service was instituted. Until this date, all postal matter was picked up by the 'patron' at the post office. Before this date, 'customers' did not exist in Postal laws. Those today who receive mail at a P.O. Box or home are referred to as 'customers,' which is, of course, a purely commercial term, and means that anyone receiving free delivery is considered to be in a commercial venue.
On the other hand, 'patron' is defined in the Law as, 'a protector or guardian'. Here is some information regarding "general delivery," (but we want to avoid general delivery, because it was created by the Post Office. The following is only for your edification).
In 1893, Marshall Cushing wrote a book titled 'The Story of Our Post Office.' On page 186, he stated that "the general delivery clerk had to deal with the leading banker, the leading politician, the smart clergyman of the town and the family that will never allow their mail to be delivered by carrier." Thus, in Chicago, 30 years after free delivery was born, these people still knew the implications of free delivery.
They knew that [it] "brings benefit to every citizen of the United States, whether he lives in city or country."(41) The key word here is 'benefit'. Receiving a 'benefit' from the government will jeopardize your abatement because it is evidence, on the record, that you have more than one Master.
When it is said that a valuable consideration for a promise may consist of a benefit to the promisor, 'benefit' means that the promisor has, in return for his promise, acquired some legal right to which he would not otherwise have been entitled "(42)
In short, free delivery is a benefit, the use of which places you into a commercial venue, and creates a legal right for the Federal government to extend its jurisdiction beyond the Post Office, which it would not otherwise be entitled to do, normally, because certain unalienable rights restrict it.
Remember, one aspect of 'unalienable' is, "not transferable," and:
...things which are not in commerce as, public roads, are, in their nature unalienable.(43)
But, this does not mean that one cannot exchange them. One can voluntarily opt for something else, i.e., a free benefit from the government -- on a post route, thereby changing one's status from unalienable to alienable -- in commerce. Through the exchange of commercial benefits, the federal power is extended.
Kelly added, referring to the "benefits of the postal highway" that:
... it is more essential for the protection of the nation than the Army and the Navy; it is the democratic instrument of a democracy.(44)
Under Lincoln, and continuing, the neo-government desperately needs commercial residents receiving free delivery, to give them the 'lienable human resources' for the debt funding system.
Further evidence of the commercial aspect of free delivery is seen in "The Postal Laws and Regulations of 1932", wherein 'letters', delivered free on 'post routes', are defined as "gas, electric, water, and tax bills or other statements of accounts, orders for merchandise, etc." (which are all commercial terms)
In the same laws, concerning transient patrons, it states, "the use of the general delivery should be discouraged if it is possible to receive mail otherwise, but if a patron insists on receiving his or her mail through the general delivery, the request must be complied with." In the current Postal Manual, transients are still totally unrestricted at general delivery, to wit:
The Post Office Domestic Mail Manual at D930, 1.1, states as follows:
General delivery is intended for use primarily at: c. Any post office to serve transients and customers not permanently located. (At 1.2, it states) Postmasters may restrict the use of general delivery by customers. (At 1.3, it states) General delivery customers can be required to present suitable identification before mail is given to them. (At 1.4, it states) General delivery mail is held for no more than 30 days, unless a shorter period is requested by the sender. Subject to 1.2, general delivery mail may be held for longer periods if requested by the sender or addressee.
1.2 and 1.3 only restrict "customers," and make no mention of "transients" from 1.1. Therefore "transients" are not restricted.
How do 'residents' fit into all this? Again, the 1932 laws only restrict 'residents' and 'persons' in general delivery, the restrictions being identical to the restrictions for 'customers' today.
In Latin 'residere' (resident) means 'sitting or sinking firmly' and 'brevis' (transient) is 'transitory, for a short time'.
As Christians, We must always look to Scripture and the Word of God as the final authority. As Scripture repeatedly points out, that, being Christians, We are 'sojourners'.
'Sojourner' is defined in the Latin as 'hospes', meaning "the 'stranger' as guest, and the host who receives him; which is, an "antique custom"(45)
In this sense, 'transient' and 'sojourner' are synonymous. To this day, the customs and usages of Christians, as sojourners, have remained in tact in general delivery.
The problem of Postmasters trying to deny general delivery for more than 30 days, has been an uphill battle for some. One must be prepared when confronting this problem.
First, cancel your P.O. Box and remove the mailbox from your house or driveway.
Second, never agree to resolve problems with anyone but the Postmaster himself. Meetings with a supervisor or Postal legal counsel can be fatal, because they can do and say anything. They are on the commercial side of The Postal Service. The Postmasters words and acts, however, must comply with Law.
Third, always put forth a benevolent attitude, carrying a demeanor of full knowledge of Postal Matters and of general delivery. This will take diligent study.
The 'mails' are a subject of vital importance to us all, because Lincoln's War began under the guise of keeping the 'post roads' open, but thereafter, free delivery and a host of other 'benefits' became the means to convert every American who used them, from patrons to residents, not of their state but of the Federal power, which opened the door to the Income Tax. This is the hidden meaning in Kelly's words that free delivery is, '...more essential...than the Army and Navy.'

[logos]

rt,

Thanks. I knew this mess re the postal system was started in Lincoln's day, but didn't know the Post Office invented general delivery.

John Doe
c/o: general post
Somewhere, Connecticut

To use general post, one would write one's location as above, correct?

[2501]

Yes I have sent and recieved mail in care of General Post Office about a half dozen times. But other times (more often)
this is how I write:
address: John: Doe
temporary mail location exact: general post
Somewhere, Connecticut

John: Doe
general post
Somewhere, Connecticut