ucc traveling court question

This is how I receive any mail.

Henry Franklin
general delivery
City/Town Post Office
North Carolina. [XXXXX]



Hope this helps.

[FindTruth]

Greetings All,

I have been researching zipcodes, and I agree that they should not be used. However, I have heard a variant solution, and that is to put it in brackets like HenryBowman. What do you think about that version?

Also, if there are many post offices within the same city/vicinity (I've been surrounded by 3 before, and have 2 closeby), would it be alright if you use the station name? Like "Stuart Station". I was told that this replaced the zip code. A good example is Richmond, Virginia. If you address a letter "Richmond, Virginia" it will be some confusion as to where the letter goes, as at least 4 Post Offices use the city Richmond in their address.

Also, I didn't see if anyone mentioned it (maybe I haven't looked around enough yet), but FYI when addressing envelopes be mindful that there are no states spelled with 2 capital letters. This denotes corporate jurisdiction rather than land mass.

Thanks for the replies.

Cheers,

FindTruth

[idknow]

I infer that every state has an Act for the registering of ficticous names;

Why doesnt the STATE or FEDGov register the FICTION that THEY form ("create" is the wrong word or "make" perhaps) when flesh is delievered from its mother?

Is the Ficticous Names Act a viable method of taking control of the strawman?

What say the forum?

[idknow]

Originally Posted by idknow

BTW, all mail is recieved by me at the general post now. And I've never had a problem. The only thing that sometimes gives me a problem is having to educate the postal workers that they cannot force me to have a zip code. I tell them it's volunatary they say no it's not. I say yes it is you have to respect my mailing information just like I respect yours. If I have to go to another post I will. I say the place I live in does not have zip codes. Zip codes are federal identifiers and since I don't live in a federal place why would I identify me using federal identifiers? They very quickly become your friend after you've stood up for your information. Other times I simply say I do not use zip codes! Or, I am zip code exempt. I always to make shure to thank them too. If you want more info on the copyright I used pm me for details. 2501

Not to minimise the prior material that you wrote, it's all education to me, but I need to know more about General delivery. the local usps customer service manager and certain of the from desk personnel are completely disobedient to what general delivery is and they (years ago) refused to allow me to have 'will call' mail for more than a few months. i dont know why they stopped other than that the manager i refered to above wasnt nice to me at all and he poisoned several transitional postmasters to get his way.

As it is now, a few years later since general delivery, the usps is now losing my mail: bill payments and one package to the superior court of pennsylvania.

Anyway, all comments, cites, pointers, urls, etc are welcomed by all.

thanks much.[/quote]

on the forum here, search for "ecclesia" and various mispellings

and for "general" "post" or "mail"

and use the sitemap anchor at the bottom of the page

(2006 mar 17) Careful here I'm writing to myself and I didnt even realise it when I answered the other day!

LOL. the hazzards of NOT READING who the author is!
roflmao

[idknow]

Originally Posted by 2501

Logos,
general post-office
It is essential for the success of your abatement that you go through the general post-office.
Going through the general post-office is more than having your matter posted there. It is a political question which must be resolved, using the proper tools of Law available: negotiation, reprisal and war.(46) The reasons for this become apparent when you begin to realize specifically what the general post-office is. It is more than a mailing location; it is more than just a place to pickup your mail. It is a political duty--involving a court in which you, acting Ambassador for Our Sovereign Lord and Saviour Jesus, the Christ, represent Him and His Law here on earth. We make no apologies for this attitude. This is the Truth of the matter, regardless of what any attorney tells you. Following this introduction are all the maxims of Law used in the abatements with which you should become very familiar.
The general post-office cannot be denied to any bondservant of Christ operating outside of a commercial venue. The evidence of this is in the fact that the general post-office has never been attached to any legislation through commercial statutes.
On July 1st, 1863, free city delivery service was instituted. Until this date, all postal matter was picked up by the 'patron' at the post office. Before this date, 'customers' did not exist in Postal laws. Those today who receive mail at a P.O. Box or home are referred to as 'customers,' which is, of course, a purely commercial term, and means that anyone receiving free delivery is considered to be in a commercial venue.
On the other hand, 'patron' is defined in the Law as, 'a protector or guardian'. Here is some information regarding "general delivery," (but we want to avoid general delivery, because it was created by the Post Office. The following is only for your edification).
In 1893, Marshall Cushing wrote a book titled 'The Story of Our Post Office.' On page 186, he stated that "the general delivery clerk had to deal with the leading banker, the leading politician, the smart clergyman of the town and the family that will never allow their mail to be delivered by carrier." Thus, in Chicago, 30 years after free delivery was born, these people still knew the implications of free delivery.
They knew that [it] "brings benefit to every citizen of the United States, whether he lives in city or country."(41) The key word here is 'benefit'. Receiving a 'benefit' from the government will jeopardize your abatement because it is evidence, on the record, that you have more than one Master.
When it is said that a valuable consideration for a promise may consist of a benefit to the promisor, 'benefit' means that the promisor has, in return for his promise, acquired some legal right to which he would not otherwise have been entitled "(42)
In short, free delivery is a benefit, the use of which places you into a commercial venue, and creates a legal right for the Federal government to extend its jurisdiction beyond the Post Office, which it would not otherwise be entitled to do, normally, because certain unalienable rights restrict it.
Remember, one aspect of 'unalienable' is, "not transferable," and:
...things which are not in commerce as, public roads, are, in their nature unalienable.(43)
But, this does not mean that one cannot exchange them. One can voluntarily opt for something else, i.e., a free benefit from the government -- on a post route, thereby changing one's status from unalienable to alienable -- in commerce. Through the exchange of commercial benefits, the federal power is extended.
Kelly added, referring to the "benefits of the postal highway" that:
... it is more essential for the protection of the nation than the Army and the Navy; it is the democratic instrument of a democracy.(44)
Under Lincoln, and continuing, the neo-government desperately needs commercial residents receiving free delivery, to give them the 'lienable human resources' for the debt funding system.
Further evidence of the commercial aspect of free delivery is seen in "The Postal Laws and Regulations of 1932", wherein 'letters', delivered free on 'post routes', are defined as "gas, electric, water, and tax bills or other statements of accounts, orders for merchandise, etc." (which are all commercial terms)
In the same laws, concerning transient patrons, it states, "the use of the general delivery should be discouraged if it is possible to receive mail otherwise, but if a patron insists on receiving his or her mail through the general delivery, the request must be complied with." In the current Postal Manual, transients are still totally unrestricted at general delivery, to wit:
The Post Office Domestic Mail Manual at D930, 1.1, states as follows:
General delivery is intended for use primarily at: c. Any post office to serve transients and customers not permanently located. (At 1.2, it states) Postmasters may restrict the use of general delivery by customers. (At 1.3, it states) General delivery customers can be required to present suitable identification before mail is given to them. (At 1.4, it states) General delivery mail is held for no more than 30 days, unless a shorter period is requested by the sender. Subject to 1.2, general delivery mail may be held for longer periods if requested by the sender or addressee.
1.2 and 1.3 only restrict "customers," and make no mention of "transients" from 1.1. Therefore "transients" are not restricted.
How do 'residents' fit into all this? Again, the 1932 laws only restrict 'residents' and 'persons' in general delivery, the restrictions being identical to the restrictions for 'customers' today.
In Latin 'residere' (resident) means 'sitting or sinking firmly' and 'brevis' (transient) is 'transitory, for a short time'.
As Christians, We must always look to Scripture and the Word of God as the final authority. As Scripture repeatedly points out, that, being Christians, We are 'sojourners'.
'Sojourner' is defined in the Latin as 'hospes', meaning "the 'stranger' as guest, and the host who receives him; which is, an "antique custom"(45)
In this sense, 'transient' and 'sojourner' are synonymous. To this day, the customs and usages of Christians, as sojourners, have remained in tact in general delivery.
The problem of Postmasters trying to deny general delivery for more than 30 days, has been an uphill battle for some. One must be prepared when confronting this problem.
First, cancel your P.O. Box and remove the mailbox from your house or driveway.
Second, never agree to resolve problems with anyone but the Postmaster himself. Meetings with a supervisor or Postal legal counsel can be fatal, because they can do and say anything. They are on the commercial side of The Postal Service. The Postmasters words and acts, however, must comply with Law.
Third, always put forth a benevolent attitude, carrying a demeanor of full knowledge of Postal Matters and of general delivery. This will take diligent study.
The 'mails' are a subject of vital importance to us all, because Lincoln's War began under the guise of keeping the 'post roads' open, but thereafter, free delivery and a host of other 'benefits' became the means to convert every American who used them, from patrons to residents, not of their state but of the Federal power, which opened the door to the Income Tax. This is the hidden meaning in Kelly's words that free delivery is, '...more essential...than the Army and Navy.'

2501, excellent summary and esplanation

Admin can you cross-link or copy the above post of 2501 to a proper postal-thread?

thanks pookie

[J.W.]

In response to the original question raised, the answer is no.

Of course this is my personal contention based on simple logic.

First off, we would have to give 100 percent credit to the Strawman theory which I do not but do admit I am sympathetic to some dynamics of the theory more so in the nature of a philosophical perspective. Even if there was a Strawman it is not yours nor did you create it and thus there is no way to establish a nexus that would hold up in any court or at least hasn’t to date. I do not see how anyone would be justified in bringing forth a lawsuit in any capacity due to a simple traffic ticket especially after one purportedly "captured” his or her Strawman. I say to do so would be utter folly.

There are much better ways to deal with a traffic citation in my opinion. Going to traffic court and dueling it out can be an educational experience however, often times even though you may win, a win of course having the citation dismissed, my opinion is you still loose in the end considering the time, gas, parking, food and so forth which you shall never be reimbursed for. Being a glutton for punishment I would still go to court for the duel if I were to receive a traffic citation and if the court were local I would most likely go to court just to have a bit of fun. Otherwise one must weigh out everything and determine which is the best choice in the end.

[kmcarr]

If anyone is interested I have the 2006 USPS DMM on PDF. It is a huge book 1800 pages but it is searchable. The file is 26mb so I wont post it here. It may also be available on the USPS website, I dont have a link because mine PDF was provided by a friend. PM me if you would like a copy or maby Admin would want it in the downloads sec.

[charlesa6]

Originally Posted by Jason Whitney

In response to the original question raised, the answer is no.

Of course this is my personal contention based on simple logic.

First off, we would have to give 100 percent credit to the Strawman theory which I do not but do admit I am sympathetic to some dynamics of the theory more so in the nature of a philosophical perspective. Even if there was a Strawman it is not yours nor did you create it and thus there is no way to establish a nexus that would hold up in any court or at least hasn’t to date. I do not see how anyone would be justified in bringing forth a lawsuit in any capacity due to a simple traffic ticket especially after one purportedly "captured” his or her Strawman. I say to do so would be utter folly.

There are much better ways to deal with a traffic citation in my opinion. Going to traffic court and dueling it out can be an educational experience however, often times even though you may win, a win of course having the citation dismissed, my opinion is you still loose in the end considering the time, gas, parking, food and so forth which you shall never be reimbursed for. Being a glutton for punishment I would still go to court for the duel if I were to receive a traffic citation and if the court were local I would most likely go to court just to have a bit of fun. Otherwise one must weigh out everything and determine which is the best choice in the end.

Yep!! I Agree. Time consumption.