As to the way I type, this is the way I talk. Yes, even in court. I started talking this way to confound them and its kinda stuck. As to hood time,...I live in "the hood". I am a man who has been arrested for smiply not hearing what the cop said. (yes seriously) As to the cites, of course ill share. Not all states have the same statutes and/or rules of court, so you may be looking for something similar. and yes you can cite rules of court just as fast as you can a statute.
Pretrial paperwork submitted,
Notice Of Revocation And Revocation Of Commercial Account, which includes the commercial account. complete with a copy of the receipt clearly stamped Oct of 94. This document is about the revoking of various powers of attorney expressed and implied from all judges and etc. Both the judge and the PA received a copy of this 3 or 4 days after I got the tickets. I remember reading somewhere on Sj that you are assumed to be a corporation unless you deny it by affidavit. Well this affidavit is over 10 years old and unrebutted. my paperwork has cites from the following:
F.R.C.P. FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURES
U.C.C. UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
U.S.C. UNITED STATES CODES
U.S.C.A. UNITED STATES CODES ANNOTATED
Here we can use signature for an example
We find the cites from the ucc talking about signature and state statute talking about signatures as well. They say "if you don't sign your not liable" so I would use this as its covered by at least 2 cites. And so on down the line. The only difference between my federal work and my ticket work is in the ticket work I also use state statute. Now the big difference for me is im not trying to tell them how or why im not guilty, but rather whats wrong with their procedure and im doing it using their statutes.
The following are some of the statutes I used throughout the case. Starting with the one everyone `s been asking about.
http://www.16thcircuit.org/localrules/rules.asp
Rule 4 - Filing of Cases
Rule 4.9 - Special or Private Process Servers
1.
Any person serving process within Jackson County, Missouri, whether through appointment by the court or otherwise,
must establish by affidavit that he or she meets the qualifications provided in section (3)(b) of this rule, as stated below.
>>do cops meet such requirements? But the part everyone wants is found at
3b (6) Not be related to or
employed by a party in the action
as cops are working for cities, municipalities, and police boards they are employed by a party in the action. Yes im aware that it says special and private process servers but here there are o public process servers, and having checked to see if the cops name was on the list kept by the court to issue process (it wasn't ) then he failed to meet the standards needed to issue summons.
Whether it was this or the paperwork or the combination you decide
and HB is right it starts with frcp 4, goes to 4.9 supra then there was no verifaction of the presentment and a few more things but im sure you get the idea.
as to the rewrites....this is the only one. .
if you dont already have it that is.
livewire
