Affidavit Challenging Jurisdiction

[charlesa6]

You get it, Weis. We do!

"good job", "keep up the good work", hummmn,

[Akira]

Weis,

Is there a way I can quote the entire thread?

[Livefire]

I wonder if charles and idknow are in reality Hanz and Franz of SNL fame.......Ok GIRLYPOSTER!!!!! WE'RE GONNA PUMP UP!! (clap) YOUR COUNT!!!! hehehe

[idknow]

Originally Posted by Livefire

I wonder if charles and idknow are in reality Hanz and Franz of SNL fame.......Ok GIRLYPOSTER!!!!! WE'RE GONNA PUMP UP!! (clap) YOUR COUNT!!!! hehehe

I'm Hanz!

He's Franz!

Together we are

The GIRLY-POSTERS

roflmao

[charlesa6]

Originally Posted by idknow

I'm Hanz!

He's Franz!

Together we are

The GIRLY-POSTERS

roflmao

That is a good one. I love it.

[planetmark]

I'm gonna save that affidavit. That's great stuff.

Oh, that UCC quote at the end of your affidavit.. "UCC 3-208". That doesn't exist. Did you mean to use UCC 1-308?

§ 1-308. Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.

(a) A party that with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as "without prejudice," "under protest," or the like are sufficient.

(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to an accord and satisfaction.

[KITCHIE]

Thank you for the heads up on the correct 1-308. I am glad you like the affidavit.

Kitchie

ps I still don't know how to quote in a box like Hanz and Franz do!! LOL

[Judge Roy Bean]

Originally Posted by KITCHIE

OK I think, with the help of my great friends and mentors, I believe I have figured IT out.
.....
I am traveling along with my friend and suddenly this corporate cop who is armed interrupts my travel and tells me I have to give him my DL and registration. So I notify the cop that I am not in commerce today and so I don’t have those things.

And they don't care if you're in, out, around, above or below commerce.

I can't wait until sometime around the 28th of this month for a Kitchie post ranting and raving about the corruption of the judge.

Originally Posted by KITCHIE

Boy howdy is that going to be fun!!!!!!

Kitchie

Well, fun isn't exactly the term others who keep dragging this tired old theory into court would use. They add court costs when you lose your case. If you go off the deep end like some of the more whacked-out proponents of this stuff, you end up in contempt, and that can only add to your fun.

Kitchie, you have a pretty good chance that the arresting officer won't show up. The most recent number I saw was approximately 30%. Those are much better odds than using legally meaningless arguments.

[SansRecours]

When Y'all are tired of fooling around and want to raise real issues, and are convinced the officer has no authority to commence an action and that you have no duty to make a general appearance then maybe you will read and understand my thread Driver License and Registration Please?

Please believe me, I am not tooting my own horn. Y'all are constantly making presumptions and theories rule your thoughts and actions to our collective hurt.

That affidavit states a lot of useless conclusions (like 1 through 24) and unless Kitchie states that she went and personally viewed the record statements 25 through the end are conclusions. It will be a miracle if the magistrate does not enter a plea of not guilty on your behalf, call your do***ent a motion and deny it, and set a pre trial date.

I am telling you that this assumption and presumption on everyone's part as to what the nexus in a traffic case is, is DEATH in the courtroom.

Does the officer, by his signature and none other, have the power and the authority in that signature to commence an action in the name of any state, municipality, or legal fiction when that officer is NOT AN ATTORNEY?????

There is a BIG difference between having the power and the authority to write a ticket and (allegedly) complain, and to actually commence an action.

Every rule and statute (federal civil rules are statutory) concerning pleading states that an action must be brought by the real party of interest or its attorney.
Is the officer the real party of interest or an attorney???

Every state places the authority for commencing actions in its name upon an attorney, specifically of the prosecuting or district kind. Same question.

How can you even presume that the state is a party when the signature commencing the action has not that authority. The commercial nexus presumption, although theoretically valid, fails in its application. It reaches the merits of driving.

Is there any case and/or controversy within the meaning of the constitution as it applies to you, Kitchie????

Do you have a duty to assist ANY ONE OR THING in a prosecution against yourself???

These are the REAL issues.

I am still SansRecours