|
zandi,
You can still do it... no harm in asking! If you don't try, the outcome is certain, so you have little to lose by trying.
The docs will still do their job... but you've made your job much more difficult.
It's true that 'subject matter jurisdiction' can be challenged at any time. If you challenge SMJ in the very beginning, the burden of proof is on them. If you've acquiesced in some fashion, which you have, you can still make the challenge, but now the burden of proof is on you, and the judge will not be easily swayed.
Your basic premise is, "I made a mistake. I didn't understand what I was doing. If I had it to do over......"
Let me be blunt... You going to need an all out assaullt against them to prevail. Unless you're prepared to put the situation in the hands of our Heavenly Father, and declare same, by reading the "opening dialog" as written, I would't get my hopes up to high. But win or lose, it will be good experience for you.
For HIS Glory,
Akira
__________________
Akira = Akira-
Counselor in Law (student) - I live it, I don't 'practice'
No post is ever intended as 'legal' advice. Lawful perspectives discussed openly.
"Pro and Con are opposites, this is plainly seen.
If progress means 'to move forward', what does congress mean?" - Nipsy Russel
"It's not the will to win, it's the will to prepare to win." - Bobby Knight
Last edited by Akira : 03-25-2006 at 06:27 AM.
|