traffic court today

[FreeFromContract]

Originally Posted by Judge Roy Bean

He's mostl likely trying to prevent you from being hung for filing frivolous nonsense. You as a pro se defendant can get away with a lot of crap and may not be slapped with contempt or sanctions. As I've told people before, it's a matter of how much patience the Judge has for schemes and the people who buy into them.

Opinion unless you can provide verifiable facts to back it up...

Originally Posted by Judge Roy Bean

A mandamus is meaningless unless you've exhausted your appeal processes. Since there hasn't been a ruling you're in legal lallaland with something like that.

Opinion unless you can provide verifiable facts to back it up...

Originally Posted by Judge Roy Bean

You won't know anything until the May 10th session, and there won't be a dismissal unless the prosecutor's office is a bunch of chimpanzees.

Opinion unless you can provide verifiable facts to back it up...

Originally Posted by Judge Roy Bean

I think the judge was giving you an opportunity to try and rescue yourself from a whacko defense you paid for. One that he or she probably already knows about but won't slap you around unless you keep standing there trying to argue about it.

At least here you admit this is your opinion.

I asked you a couple questions a week or so ago and I have yet to hear a response. The questions: I must ask, do you post such information to intentionally mislead people? If not, what was the basis/source/foundation for the information you provided?

Here's the link for your reference:

http://www.suijuris.net/forum/66441-post41.html

Make any progress on formulating a response Roy?

[Akira]

Originally Posted by Jerseee

That is correct Judge (about the Mandamus)!!!

I do recall that the Mandamus is used after the appeal process--however, the way the Mandamus is used here is more like a notice or assistance versus a command.

Do not be fooled. The judge's perspective is correct for a 'represented' litigant, (or a pro per litigant in an art. III court, if you can find one).

We the People (sovereigns) are the church and the state. The sovereign brings his own law to their courts of inferior jurisdiction. Administrative tribunals hold no remedy for us.

Make no mistake. The mandamus is appropriate as presented.

The courts of government use misnomer to decieve the sovereign into becoming an accommodation party to their congress created corporate / legal entity in order to usurp the sovereigns rights, for personal gain.

All US citizens are insane (incompetent), either by folley (choice), or by ignorance, as they exchange God given rights, for the priviledges of men.

Sovereigns do not seek to 'appeal' the decision. We aren't interested in the opinion or the decision of the insane. The decision was made via the default. We only seek the magistrates master to recognise our lawful jurisdiction, and to follow lawful orders (act on the mandamus). We are HIS ambassadors, after all.

Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God. 2 Corinthians 5:20

Seek nothing from them. Maintain your 'jurisdictional veil' at all times.


For HIS Glory,
Akira

[Akira]

JRB, et al,

Out of all due respect and fairness to JRB, and his observations / opinion...

Although I haven't actually seen KingC's docs.. I am aware that he started with the TS docs, and then tweaked them to accommodate his unique circumstance.

JRB's observations may be quite appropriate.


For HIS Glory,
Akira

[FreeFromContract]

Originally Posted by Akira

JRB, et al,

Out of all due respect and fairness to JRB, and his observations / opinion...

Although I haven't actually seen KingC's docs.. I am aware that he started with the TS docs, and then tweaked them to accommodate his unique circumstance.

JRB's observations may be quite appropriate.


For HIS Glory,
Akira

They may indeed be. However, I have observed him post information in the past that at the very least was incorrect and at worst intentionally misleading.

So, when I see Mr. Bean post something like this....

Originally Posted by JudgeRoyBean

I think the judge was giving you an opportunity to try and rescue yourself from a whacko defense you paid for. One that he or she probably already knows about but won't slap you around unless you keep standing there trying to argue about it.

...it makes you question his rational when there are people who claim success using ticket slayer.

Given that KINGC has come here for help with a situation he's dealing with I believe it's proper and reasonable to ask for the reference of authority so that not only can KINGC learn, but so that we all may learn.

[KingC]

Thanks for the posts you all. I am going to keep learning the administrative process and how to impeace the witness..

[BOBT12]

Originally Posted by FreeFromContract

They may indeed be. However, I have observed him post information in the past that at the very least was incorrect and at worst intentionally misleading.

So, when I see Mr. Bean post something like this....



...it makes you question his rational when there are people who claim success using ticket slayer.

Given that KINGC has come here for help with a situation he's dealing with I believe it's proper and reasonable to ask for the reference of authority so that not only can KINGC learn, but so that we all may learn.

We are all expected to support our statements in this forum, including the judges and attorneys among us. Otherwise, your credibility and usefulness will be diminished.

Isn't this a standard required in every court in this nation?

[KingC]

I just tweaked everything for a moorish american national.

instead of a common law state flag i just put moroccan flag. I said if anyone has any issue just notify the consular courts like it says in the treaty of 1836.

[charlesa6]

Make sense.

[Akira]

All,

The purpose of my post was only to maintain the integrity of the Common law Default procedure (TS docs), by publicly acknowledging that they had, in fact, been altered. The goal was not to pick on KingC or presume the extent of his modification of the docs.

My motivation was strictly total disclosure of the circumstance, and I chose my words carefully, so no clouded conclusions would be drawn by the folks reading this thread, or from the comments made by those who posted opinions, thinking the docs were unaltered.

Too many times I have helped folks with these docs, only to have them decide that they suddenly know what they're doing, and tweak them as they see fit. Invariably, when these folks fail in court, they come back berating the docs. (I'm not implying that KingC has or will take this attitude).

Further, if JRB's comments can shake your 'foundations' then he has done his job. While, in this forum, it is proper to defend you position with cites, ect., when you face the monster in the black rode, he won't offer you that courtesy. If you can't handle it here, you can't handle it in court. This is not to say JRB shouldn't back up his position like everyone else. He clearly has access to data, knowledge, personal experience, and dare I say, wisdom and grace. I concur with DM, that much can be gleaned from what JRB, doesn't say.

Frankly, JRB is one of the better teachers here, albeit, somewhat antagonistic.. lol

Just my not so humble opinion...


For HIS GLory,
Akira

[KingC]

http://moorishnationalrepublic.com/pg33.html

http://moorishnationalrepublic.com/faq.htm

http://moorishnationalrepublic.com/pg28.html