Affidavit Challenging Jurisdiction

[KITCHIE]

Well I FINALLY received a ticket for no plates and registration. Tow tickets in two days!!! One from a corporate City cop and one from the sheriff who said to me "In my opinion you need those things".

So he gives me the citation and says "Have a better day." And I said "This is a already a great day." He looked at me like I was nuts.

Attached is my court aff for the Sparks citation. I think you will find it interesting.


Kithcie

[scottinalaska]

Geez, Kitchie!
Are you hoping that your rapid response to this ticket will overwhelm them with too much to bring to a court hearing and they will lose this thing?
It is true that most things you mention are simply assumed but never really entered into the record during a "trial."
My hat is off to you though. With those fines, it sounded like you were buying a room at the graybar hotel that day.
scotinalaska

[idknow]

Originally Posted by scottinalaska

Geez, Kitchie!
Are you hoping that your rapid response to this ticket will overwhelm them with too much to bring to a court hearing and they will lose this thing?
It is true that most things you mention are simply assumed but never really entered into the record during a "trial."
My hat is off to you though. With those fines, it sounded like you were buying a room at the graybar hotel that day.
scotinalaska

Go, go, Rapid Gadget WordWriter!

heh

"Do NOT feed the bridge trolls!"

lol

[rottweiler]

KITCHIE, does your private common law contract mix common law and color of law by using a notary public and "signed without prejudice UCC 3-208"? Would it not be better to use two witnesses to your signature and "all rights reserved"?

Can a Notary(officer of the court) identify flesh and blood? Do your natural rights come from the UCC or from the Creator?

Can someone tell me if a Notary Public is a legal fiction that ID's other fictions only? On my stamp my name is in all-caps. Why do you think they do that?


Does using the UCC

Originally Posted by KITCHIE

Well I FINALLY received a ticket for no plates and registration. Tow tickets in two days!!! One from a corporate City cop and one from the sheriff who said to me "In my opinion you need those things".

So he gives me the citation and says "Have a better day." And I said "This is a already a great day." He looked at me like I was nuts.

Attached is my court aff for the Sparks citation. I think you will find it interesting.


Kithcie

[charlesa6]

Keep us posted.

[KITCHIE]

This my affidavit that I will file with the court along with the administrative business of the court. That business is that they can't have a trial until I have finished the administrative process.

I attached my admin remedy on the thread 7 tickets.

Rottweiler--- absolutely NOT. A Notary IS two witnesses and they are officers of the court who will testify on your behalf that you signed the doc titled Affidavit or whatever.

They have accused me of being in commerce. I noticed them I was not in commerce I was taking care of my private business and I didn't need license and registration for that. The court recognizes the exact way the affidavit is written and there is no wiggle room for them. They chose to step outside the law and cite me "In my opinion" as the sheriff remarked to me. Well since when do you enforce your opinion? Now...THEY WILL PAY.

I keep telling everybody when you fight them, you have to tell them your not in commerce. They presume you are in commerce and the law states you have to prove you are not.

The key with the courts is they ALWAYS recast you as Pro per and that puts you under their corporate jurisdiction and you lose. NEVER let them "re-cast" your status i.e. properia personnae and sui juris!! And if they enter a judgment against you you are all set for a void judgment.

Kitchie



Have you won stuff doing the "signature" the way you suggested?

[idknow]

Originally Posted by KITCHIE

This my affidavit that I will file with the court along with the administrative business of the court. That business is that they can't have a trial until I have finished the administrative process.

I attached my admin remedy on the thread 7 tickets.

Rottweiler--- absolutely NOT. A Notary IS two witnesses and they are officers of the court who will testify on your behalf that you signed the doc titled Affidavit or whatever.

They have accused me of being in commerce. I noticed them I was not in commerce I was taking care of my private business and I didn't need license and registration for that. The court recognizes the exact way the affidavit is written and there is no wiggle room for them. They chose to step outside the law and cite me "In my opinion" as the sheriff remarked to me. Well since when do you enforce your opinion? Now...THEY WILL PAY.

I keep telling everybody when you fight them, you have to tell them your not in commerce. They presume you are in commerce and the law states you have to prove you are not.

The key with the courts is they ALWAYS recast you as Pro per and that puts you under their corporate jurisdiction and you lose. NEVER let them "re-cast" your status i.e. properia personnae and sui juris!! And if they enter a judgment against you you are all set for a void judgment.

Kitchie



Have you won stuff doing the "signature" the way you suggested?

K, would use of an abatement solve the "court's reticence" for recasting as you said above?

[Livefire]

Oh Kitchie dear!!!!

You may find these articles quite edifying

http://nj.npri.org/nj99/04/cover_story.htm
http://nj.npri.org/nj99/02/highway_patrol.htm
http://www.leg.state.nv.us/70th/Minu...eting%204.html

Try digging out the exact report or statute which shows a judge's retirement fund receiving funding from traffic fines and you have yourself a slam dunk in court. P.S. Assembly Bill 19 in the last URL is also interesting reading.....There was something about "bail" on your ticket.

[rottweiler]

Ok, I am just trying to help. I thought the notary and the UCC were public and you are trying to make them rebut your affidavit that you are private. I was afraid you may have rebutted it yourself by claiming rights under the UCC and having a actor "ID" you. I personally would use two witnesses and "all rights reserved" by my signature. What you are doing is a private common law contract so I just thought the best way was to keep it all in common law. There have been many wins doing it like I said only not by me. I own/operate a limo service so I have plates, insurance, etc. Friday I go to traffic court after filing TicketSlayer docs for a dog at large citation(no lease) and I will let you know how it turns out.

Originally Posted by KITCHIE

This my affidavit that I will file with the court along with the administrative business of the court. That business is that they can't have a trial until I have finished the administrative process.

I attached my admin remedy on the thread 7 tickets.

Rottweiler--- absolutely NOT. A Notary IS two witnesses and they are officers of the court who will testify on your behalf that you signed the doc titled Affidavit or whatever.

They have accused me of being in commerce. I noticed them I was not in commerce I was taking care of my private business and I didn't need license and registration for that. The court recognizes the exact way the affidavit is written and there is no wiggle room for them. They chose to step outside the law and cite me "In my opinion" as the sheriff remarked to me. Well since when do you enforce your opinion? Now...THEY WILL PAY.

I keep telling everybody when you fight them, you have to tell them your not in commerce. They presume you are in commerce and the law states you have to prove you are not.

The key with the courts is they ALWAYS recast you as Pro per and that puts you under their corporate jurisdiction and you lose. NEVER let them "re-cast" your status i.e. properia personnae and sui juris!! And if they enter a judgment against you you are all set for a void judgment.

Kitchie



Have you won stuff doing the "signature" the way you suggested?

[KITCHIE]

Well I have discovered from a friend of mine how I am going to handle these two officers.

Here is the deal. There are only two things that we can have...Liberty or involuntary servitude. When gubermint forces you to do something you don't want to do that is called involuntary servitude.

So he got a citation for no DL. He files a:

Motion for Discovery for Conditions Precedent.

Comes now John Quincy public, in proper person to move this court for disclosures of conditions precedent.

To prevent trial by ambush please disclose the following conditions precedent that might alter the course or outcome of the trial or effect the judges decision.

1. Are you an elected Justice of the Peace of xxx County?

2 Does that office require an oath of office?

3. Do you operate the facilities of the Justice's Court in/for any other function?

4. Are you under contract with the State of Nevada or XXX County to serve them in the capacityof administrative law judge?

5. In this instant case are you functioning judicially or administratively?

6. If you are or were functioning in a capacity other than the Justice of the Peace, would you disclose that?

7. Is this function a contractual obligation?

8. Does your oath as Justice of the Peace also apply to your other functions?

9. Does your obligation to afford due process of law pursuant to the Fifth Amendment also apply to your other functions?

10. Does your bond as Justice of the Peace apply to your other functions?

11. Were you vested with criminal jurisdiction in the enforcement of the statutes of the State of Neveda?

12. In this instant case is there an injured party?

13. Does the State of Nevada have the authority to regulate the noncommercial use of the public right of way?

14. When enforcing the statutes of Nevada are you authorized by your contract to impose involuntary servitude?

These conditions precedent, that can affect the conduct and outcome of the trial schedualed in this matter, also the consideration and decisioin of the judge, must be known by the named defendant for the proper conduct at the trial and to prevent surprise.

I would like to remind the court that whether proceeding judicially or administratively and unanswered question is a fraud upon the court.

So this is what my friend filed. Then according to Rule 13 Nevada Rules of civil procedure he also filed a cumpulsory counter claim.

The EVENT: My friend and the DA went outside and talked. She tried to get him to admit that this was a criminal action. His reply we don't know that yet. She tried to get him to settle and he would not.

Court was started and the judge said "Were you able to settle this matter? DA: NO

Judge I am disqualifing myself because I cannot be fair and impartial. This will be heard at a later date. Court is adjourned.

Part of his counter claim says "The imposition of involuntary servitude is the result of the unlawful regulation of the noncommercial use of the public right of way and is admitted to and documented by the MISDEMEANOR/TRAFFIC CITATION AND COMPLAINT No.15798 issued by officer Real Rat ID #7758 of the SParks Police Department.

So when the cop does this HE is comitting a crime and you make a claim based on that.

When I get the whole thing I will share.
Kitchie