Help -- Fast

Hi Again,
As I told you, I filed --- certified with third party proof -- the RFUSAL FOR CAUSE posted by Weis with hte cop. As stated in the letter, I gave 10 days to respond.

No response so far! What should one do now?
Notify DA & Clerk of Court ??

Thanks

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by BenGera

Hi Again,
As I told you, I filed --- certified with third party proof -- the RFUSAL FOR CAUSE posted by Weis with hte cop. As stated in the letter, I gave 10 days to respond.

No response so far! What should one do now?
Notify DA & Clerk of Court ??

Thanks

Publish the default in common law. Your clerk is the county clerk and recorder.

[Glenn]

Search out the LA Lawman there are sights out there that has is info if you realy wish to beat this use his stuff.

Glenn

[mrg]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

Publish the default in common law. Your clerk is the county clerk and recorder.

Yes indeed, and once it thus becomes public record, it cannot be denied as admissable evidence,

[Judge Roy Bean]

Originally Posted by BenGera

Hi Again,
As I told you, I filed --- certified with third party proof -- the RFUSAL FOR CAUSE posted by Weis with hte cop. As stated in the letter, I gave 10 days to respond.

No response so far! What should one do now?
Notify DA & Clerk of Court ??

Thanks

Don't worry. They'll ignore it (because it means nothing in the legal sense).

When you don't appear as the summons directed, the court will issue a warrant for failure to appear.

You have nothing to worry about until you get pulled over again or go to get insurance, renew your driver's license or register a vehicle. Then things start to get interesting.

Life is oh so much more interesting when you try to BS the system. In medicine, they call it quackery. At least with the silliness some people recommend no one usually dies, they just get incarcerated or have to pay thre or four times what the original ticket penalty was or could have been.

[Glenn]

Did you know that the British Commanders hated the colonists?

They swore all the colonists were attorneys and they could not pull unlawful acts in or out of court as they always got caught.

The thing that more that anything has brought down this country is Lawyers and Bankers.

Every one I ever meet had there interest fulfilled prior to there clients.

Attorneys and Lawyers are both Officers of the court.

Why is it an attorney or a Lawyer has there client sign a power-of –attorney before anything begins?

Maybe if they sat 2nd chair there client would win more often.

Why when Ollie North was in front of congress his attorney whispered to him what to say and what not, but do we get the same protection? NO an attorney can not invoke a constitutional protection for you and you gave up the right.

Glenn

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by Glenn

Did you know that the British Commanders hated the colonists?

They swore all the colonists were attorneys and they could not pull unlawful acts in or out of court as they always got caught.

The thing that more that anything has brought down this country is Lawyers and Bankers.

Every one I ever meet had there interest fulfilled prior to there clients.

Attorneys and Lawyers are both Officers of the court.

Why is it an attorney or a Lawyer has there client sign a power-of –attorney before anything begins?

Maybe if they sat 2nd chair there client would win more often.

Why when Ollie North was in front of congress his attorney whispered to him what to say and what not, but do we get the same protection? NO an attorney can not invoke a constitutional protection for you and you gave up the right.

Glenn

That reminds me...

The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It cannot be claimed by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person. Quote from federal judge Lee in United States v. Johnson et al. No. 11400, Middle District of Pennsylvania, 76 R. Supp. 538; 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3057, February 26, 1947. emphasis added

[RevokeTheTrust]

Don't worry. They'll ignore it (because it means nothing in the legal sense).

When you don't appear as the summons directed, the court will issue a warrant for failure to appear.

You have nothing to worry about until you get pulled over again or go to get insurance, renew your driver's license or register a vehicle. Then things start to get interesting.

Life is oh so much more interesting when you try to BS the system. In medicine, they call it quackery. At least with the silliness some people recommend no one usually dies, they just get incarcerated or have to pay thre or four times what the original ticket penalty was or could have been.

Brother Roy! You having a bad day or somthing?

Have you not considered that the Competing court where the drifting peice of scrip/contract "tickette to the freak show" was completed and signed and indorsed; administratively settled the dispute in terms of interests, authentic? I, the Count, don't move about the Orange or her countee, and collect debt from any source that I wasn't assigned and appointed to collect on someone else's behalf. As well, moving contracts around and threatening people for not pledging counterfeit name as collateral, is estoppel in the nature of preventing the damages or sale being reimbursed with lawful money.

If the people weren't forced to pledge their flesh and name for trade as collateral in the event, then you would see more case-law of State of **** vs One Smelly Hippy Wagon. As far as we are all concerned with the nature of such presentments made at strange and uncomfortable moments, an agent of a corporation presented an incomplete instrument to a senile motorist in hope that he would presume to invest some stock/collateral/debt with the speculation that a corporation may evaluate that collateral as to draw/activate a prior agreement conferring admittance to administer the property in dispute (to the usuall agreeable protest of any captors). To comprehend is Negotiable Instruments law; that an instrument not signed is open for correction and completion. I'll quote from a reference I keep under the fighting chair of this here aquatic drag-trike that I use onshore for movement and recumbenantly into the sea to collect my modified-Grocery-store shopping-cart lobster pots.

"Although an instrument is nonnegotiable if it states that it is subject to or governed by any other agreement, it may refer to the transaction or agreement out of which it arises. (See Allentberg v. Rapken & Co. (1930)"

That little peice of paper needs to have some covering striked through to reveal it a proper negotion and not just intellectual property from a foreign entity to draw from its necessity to use it. (standing timber contracts reveal that even the origin of paper on wich a contract is derived can be used to draw royalties from an event.)

"A negotiable instrument must contain an unconditional promise or order to pay. (Unif.Com.C. 3-103(1)(b).)"

The peice of paper is typed for another party to "agree to appear" without purpose; evidence of counterfeit form and irrelevant for the original dispute at hand, regardless of one's attendance at the theatre or not -- the seat is reserved and will be sold to someone if vacant at time of the doors closed at that wooden bar (not Bar or BAR). And the legislated actor, if he too doesn't appear, then they'll arrest him for violating a prior contract too. That foreign Judicial Department is silenty admitting another purpose by the mere introduction of such a form that they claim on the border fringe of the paper; membership clause to the institution that appointed that foreign Judicial Department would have disclosed whether or not the assignments were compulsory activities determined by its trusted officers at any time or activated by their inclusion of interests in a suit. Here we see de-jure Count-less tresspass, without Declaration, in attempt to seize as collateral both the people and the Lord's vessel given them.

SALES PERFORMANCE
A. In General.
1. Identification of Goods to Contract
Identification is the act of designating particular goods as the subject matter of the contract. Identification is ordinarily unambiguous and doubts should be resolved by concluding that identification has ocurred. (See U.C.C 2501, Official Comment 2; see generaly 1 C.E.B., Commercial Law clause 13.2 et seq.; 3 Anderson 3d, clause 2-501:5.) Goods may be identified "at any time and in any manner explicitly agreed to by the parties." (U.C.C. 2501(1); and see Official Comment 3.) In the absence of an explicit agreement, identification occurs as follows:
(a) Goods "already existing and identified" are identified when contract is made. (U.C.C. 2501(1)(a).)
(b) Future goods other than unborn young or future crops are identified when the seller ships, marks or otherwise designates goods as those to which the contract refers. (U.C.C. 2501(1)(b); see 3 Anderson 3d, clauses 2-501:21, 2-501:22.)

Yet again, the "tickette" presumes that the property in dispute is for Sale.

Today, someone is trying to diminish His love:
without prejudice, Gregory Thomas(tm)

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by RevokeTheTrust

Brother Roy! You having a bad day or somthing?

Have you not considered that the Competing court where the drifting peice of scrip/contract "tickette to the freak show" was completed and signed and indorsed; administratively settled the dispute in terms of interests, authentic? I, the Count, don't move about the Orange or her countee, and collect debt from any source that I wasn't assigned and appointed to collect on someone else's behalf. As well, moving contracts around and threatening people for not pledging counterfeit name as collateral, is estoppel in the nature of preventing the damages or sale being reimbursed with lawful money.

If the people weren't forced to pledge their flesh and name for trade as collateral in the event, then you would see more case-law of State of **** vs One Smelly Hippy Wagon. As far as we are all concerned with the nature of such presentments made at strange and uncomfortable moments, an agent of a corporation presented an incomplete instrument to a senile motorist in hope that he would presume to invest some stock/collateral/debt with the speculation that a corporation may evaluate that collateral as to draw/activate a prior agreement conferring admittance to administer the property in dispute (to the usuall agreeable protest of any captors). To comprehend is Negotiable Instruments law; that an instrument not signed is open for correction and completion. I'll quote from a reference I keep under the fighting chair of this here aquatic drag-trike that I use onshore for movement and recumbenantly into the sea to collect my modified-Grocery-store shopping-cart lobster pots.

"Although an instrument is nonnegotiable if it states that it is subject to or governed by any other agreement, it may refer to the transaction or agreement out of which it arises. (See Allentberg v. Rapken & Co. (1930)"

That little peice of paper needs to have some covering striked through to reveal it a proper negotion and not just intellectual property from a foreign entity to draw from its necessity to use it. (standing timber contracts reveal that even the origin of paper on wich a contract is derived can be used to draw royalties from an event.)

"A negotiable instrument must contain an unconditional promise or order to pay. (Unif.Com.C. 3-103(1)(b).)"

The peice of paper is typed for another party to "agree to appear" without purpose; evidence of counterfeit form and irrelevant for the original dispute at hand, regardless of one's attendance at the theatre or not -- the seat is reserved and will be sold to someone if vacant at time of the doors closed at that wooden bar (not Bar or BAR). And the legislated actor, if he too doesn't appear, then they'll arrest him for violating a prior contract too. That foreign Judicial Department is silenty admitting another purpose by the mere introduction of such a form that they claim on the border fringe of the paper; membership clause to the institution that appointed that foreign Judicial Department would have disclosed whether or not the assignments were compulsory activities determined by its trusted officers at any time or activated by their inclusion of interests in a suit. Here we see de-jure Count-less tresspass, without Declaration, in attempt to seize as collateral both the people and the Lord's vessel given them.

SALES PERFORMANCE
A. In General.
1. Identification of Goods to Contract
Identification is the act of designating particular goods as the subject matter of the contract. Identification is ordinarily unambiguous and doubts should be resolved by concluding that identification has ocurred. (See U.C.C 2501, Official Comment 2; see generaly 1 C.E.B., Commercial Law clause 13.2 et seq.; 3 Anderson 3d, clause 2-501:5.) Goods may be identified "at any time and in any manner explicitly agreed to by the parties." (U.C.C. 2501(1); and see Official Comment 3.) In the absence of an explicit agreement, identification occurs as follows:
(a) Goods "already existing and identified" are identified when contract is made. (U.C.C. 2501(1)(a).)
(b) Future goods other than unborn young or future crops are identified when the seller ships, marks or otherwise designates goods as those to which the contract refers. (U.C.C. 2501(1)(b); see 3 Anderson 3d, clauses 2-501:21, 2-501:22.)

Yet again, the "tickette" presumes that the property in dispute is for Sale.

Today, someone is trying to diminish His love:
without prejudice, Gregory Thomas(tm)

Eloquently put Gregory Thomas. I would simply have interpreted Judge Roy Bean to be saying the same old thing he always says - might makes right and all else is BS.

JRB is always have a bad day. It is much more peaceful around here the more people who put these six on their Ignore List. With it peaceful, one can discern true remedy whether it is offensive to these folks or not.

B Rookard
Judge Roy Bean
Shoonra
Skeptic62
UGA Lawdog
AndyK


Regards,

David Merrill.

[Fed-Up]

Originally Posted by Judge Roy Bean

Don't worry. They'll ignore it (because it means nothing in the legal sense).

When you don't appear as the summons directed, the court will issue a warrant for failure to appear.

You have nothing to worry about until you get pulled over again or go to get insurance, renew your driver's license or register a vehicle. Then things start to get interesting.

Life is oh so much more interesting when you try to BS the system. In medicine, they call it quackery. At least with the silliness some people recommend no one usually dies, they just get incarcerated or have to pay thre or four times what the original ticket penalty was or could have been.

yeah, better off just bending over for the man and don't
bother trying to do anything....
just let the pukes walk all over you.
Speaking of quacks,the AMA has many
losers running around playing "doctor"

They usually meet up with their counterparts in the BAR association at the
19th hole and figure out how they're gonna further screw the public in the courts. I like Liz michael's idea:assasination. It costs so little more!!!