Travel Discuss how to reclaim the right to travel freely, public access, etc.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Travel
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 05-08-2006, 02:41 PM
RevokeTheTrust's Avatar
RevokeTheTrust RevokeTheTrust is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 93
That may be the case, but Judge Roy Bean is worthy to hear.

Greetings and blessings, holders of David Merrill and Judge Roy Bean.

Quote:
Eloquently put Gregory Thomas. I would simply have interpreted Judge Roy Bean to be saying the same old thing he always says - might makes right and all else is BS.

JRB is always have a bad day. It is much more peaceful around here the more people who put these six on their Ignore List. With it peaceful, one can discern true remedy whether it is offensive to these folks or not.

B Rookard
Judge Roy Bean
Shoonra
Skeptic62
UGA Lawdog
AndyK


Regards,

David Merrill.

Moving blinded eyes, and to hear the words not seen, I've been given some great quotes through Judge Roy Bean. If his caste would sometimes put stress upon his intellect to bring words into this forum, then it is forgiveness debted to his normal form. It's as though that above post would not need to be written and is just the dross I'm willing to wade in. If it were to draw a friend from waters filled with sharks, then I'ld poor my blood to draw them away from his heart. --

I could reason about the code; that Legislature is quietly admitting with that Judiciary Department, that everyone is ignorant until proven competent; so they create a person before instructed by the original parents, so as to scapegoat the sins of the people onto their creature, and warrant a fee for any likeness of it. At the same moment, because the alleged "education" is also provided by that Legislature and that Judicial Department, that would mean ill will for them to KNOW they are TEACHING incompetancy to their own children they claim parentage over. Parents that don't teach to pay rent, and war-ranting over a foreign alien that is studying competently in their Godly benefice; is confident that their fraud is cured before entering COURT, unrepentent by their own chaos of ignorance even to fill their orifice.

Psalm (127) is a great print broadcast for negotiations. If brother Roy wants to step through the gate, then I'll keep the squelch low enough to hear. To think that if there ever was ill will made to anyone, our brother Roy has been pressed with someone else's idolatry. A measurable number of posts for Judge Roy Bean would emit his concern the "PayTriots" are deriving wealth by selling faulty process and confidence to the same people he is convinced are not competant. Naturally, I'll agree with him upon proof of claim; and that is proof constanly being written, forgiven, and whiped away as were the rags re-tailored to be great diapers for growing babes. How would I know that brother Roy is among that Legislature and Judicial Department? Did they train brother Roy to live by their code, and not the honor inherint in his mind? He's quite honourable, to whomever he has been serving upon the plates of their copyright; strawman or not. Yet, where did he buy the title "Judge" from?

This reveals that the corporate soul sitting with a gavel on the People's bench, needs to be protected from a fraud causing him harm. He's innocent, I tell you: innocent to approach the bank telly to withdraw funds from a trust that was built on fraud and may convulse him from good air.

To think that I and David Merrill may share the same mind, would be evidence that I need to ignore David Merrill because none of him offends me; to hear more reasoning from Judge Roy Bean and discern remedy to his calibration.

with love,
Gregory-Thomas

PS: Where did you get that lobster stamp emblem that I see on all those courtships, brother David? It's re-newed testament to know that shellfishness are clean to eat and unclean to assimilate. :-)
__________________
Small Craft Advisory Warning: due to High Seas, the Stripes will be lowered until Ordinance is subdued. For the unfettered everyone-else, just shift the POV 90 degrees rite to avoid the Moors at Salvage.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-11-2006, 02:36 PM
BenGera
 
Posts: n/a
Help Fast --- Refusal For Cause

Hi To All,
As I sated earlier, I sent the REFUSAL FOR CAUSE that Weis posted.
Today I got it back in the Sheriff's envelope. Not certified, not a word. Just the ticket & the letter back!


Just F Y I
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-11-2006, 07:03 PM
charlesa6's Avatar
charlesa6 charlesa6 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenGera
Hi To All,
As I sated earlier, I sent the REFUSAL FOR CAUSE that Weis posted.
Today I got it back in the Sheriff's envelope. Not certified, not a word. Just the ticket & the letter back!


Just F Y I
it seems to me like vice-versa. They refuse it too, only they didn't right it down like you do.
__________________
Resolution pending
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-11-2006, 08:19 PM
Jerseee's Avatar
Jerseee Jerseee is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerseee
Challenge Jurisdiction.

I posted it before and I will post it again:

Challenge Jurisdiction
__________________
"FOR AS HE THINKETH IN HIS HEART, SO IS HE."
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-11-2006, 09:11 PM
Livefire's Avatar
Livefire Livefire is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerseee
I posted it before and I will post it again:

Challenge Jurisdiction

And I will add 2 words......

Ticket Slayer

While Im at it.....Section 68085.1 of the California Government Code is where you will find proof that the Judge is inured from proceeds of the traffic fine.

Last edited by Livefire : 05-11-2006 at 09:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-12-2006, 06:57 AM
kmcarr kmcarr is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenGera
As I sated earlier, I sent the REFUSAL FOR CAUSE that Weis posted.
Today I got it back in the Sheriff's envelope. Not certified, not a word. Just the ticket & the letter back!

If such a thing were to happen to me I would, 1st of all not opened a piece of Mail that did not have my name on it [Federal offense] but would have written "not at this address" on the envelope blacked out any barcodes made a copy and hotfooted it down to the local POST. While at the POST I would have given it to the clerk, letting them know that it wasn't my letta and had them round date my copy of the envelope. I certainly don't want the proper addresse of that envelope thinking I kept or peeked at "it's" private business.

But if I did Open that envelope I would have to Refuse the whole thing again. It looks to me like the Sheriff is Refusing your refusal. Hot Potato, Ya know.

But then it is just a piece of paper and only becomes threating when some one with a gun shows up looking for you because of a simple misunderstanding. I mean it was refused by you and you have the proof.

Luckily there are a lot more experienced folks here at sui juris that can opine to folks like me who can get a little confused about such a situation.

Keep us posted,
thanks
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-12-2006, 02:38 PM
mikah2k's Avatar
mikah2k mikah2k is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 338
....................

Last edited by mikah2k : 12-10-2006 at 07:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-31-2006, 11:18 AM
BenGera
 
Posts: n/a
Help Fast --- New Twist

Hello to all,

As I stated a while back, I sent the officer the REFUSAL FOR CAUSE, as posted by Weishaup..

I sent it certified, return proof of service & third party proof of mailing. I got the returned card.

The officer, after a few days sent it back to me in a sheriff's envelope bearing the specific address he gave me. I sent it back in a regular mail (I already have a proof he goot it, right?)

He sent it back yet again. This time, I kept the sheriff's envelope, and sent the letter back without stating the return address on the envelope -- not wanting to tip the deputy who the letter was from. Yesterday I got the letter back -- envelope SEEMS TO BE UNOPENNED -- with a postal yellow sticker stating the address is vacant and cannot be forwarded !! However, there is a hand written return address to me and a RETURN TO SENDER hand written next to it!


Now how could the JBT know to send it back to me if he did not open the letter and read it ???

I also found out that the USPS has changed the certified report on their web site and it does not show that the original certified letter was received !!!
It was there before!!!
I know as I looked !!!!

Talking about crooks...

Last edited by BenGera : 05-31-2006 at 11:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-31-2006, 05:09 PM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,267
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenGera

Hi To All,

As I sated earlier, I sent the REFUSAL FOR CAUSE that Weis posted.

Today I got it back in the Sheriff's envelope. Not certified, not a word. Just the ticket & the letter back!


Just F Y I



Hello to all,
As I stated a while back, I sent the officer the REFUSAL FOR CAUSE, as posted by Weishaup..

I sent it certified, return proof of service & third party proof of mailing. I got the returned card.

The officer, after a few days sent it back to me in a sheriff's envelope bearing the specific address he gave me. I sent it back in a regular mail (I already have a proof he goot it, right?)

He sent it back yet again. This time, I kept the sheriff's envelope, and sent the letter back without stating the return address on the envelope -- not wanting to tip the deputy who the letter was from. Yesterday I got the letter back -- envelope SEEMS TO BE UNOPENNED -- with a postal yellow sticker stating the address is vacant and cannot be forwarded !! However, there is a hand written return address to me and a RETURN TO SENDER hand written next to it!


Now how could the JBT know to send it back to me if he did not open the letter and read it ???

I also found out that the USPS has changed the certified report on their web site and it does not show that the original certified letter was received !!!
It was there before!!!
I know as I looked !!!!

Talking about crooks...

The sheriff is trying to ignore your process. Utilize clerks to validate the process. Maybe the clerk and recorder or better yet the clerk and recorder and the US district court clerk. Open a $39 miscellaneous case jacket for an evidence repository. You need to prove the R4C and the timeliness of the R4C too.

Go to Registered Mail with a green Return Receipt in addition to Track and Confirm. Taught you good that time huh? Print it out next time. Maybe report the incident in detail to a postal inspector. Get a case number on it. The report may not turn anything up but it may keep it from ever happening again.

Get the postal clerk to rounddate the stamps Registered Mail - the accuracy of the addresses and RM # and any fees included too.

http://friends-n-family-research.inf..._default_9.jpg
http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/Default.jpg



Regards,

David Merrill.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-31-2006, 05:43 PM
kmcarr kmcarr is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 100
It would seem to me that one would quickly tire of the mail game. Evidence of refusal is the key. Recorded in your misc case file is your evidence of the refusal. The recipt that your proscess server gave you [The USPS] will let any person who trys to say you are still undercontract to perform that you have proof you refused the contract. Maybe the Sheriff just wants you to have the original as well. How can posession of the do***ent prove you are under contract to preform with all your evidence recorded that you aint! I see R4C as saying no thank you after the face to face meeting is over. Sure Ill sign the thing when you are standing at my cardoor with a gun on your hip and then later well I changed my mind. No confrontation that way. Hell if you got the time write refused right there on both copies while signing. It's the same in the end.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Land Patent - How fast can I generate the paperwork? nralien Land Ownership 12 06-18-2008 08:55 AM
Is the END of things as we have known them in this country imminent?!! freeindeed End Days of America 187 06-08-2006 09:21 PM
Now, you can't even pay them off fast rushpat Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 0 03-02-2006 01:48 PM
Emergency!! The Feds have pulled another fast one!! bruce End Days of America 14 11-11-2005 02:31 AM
How to Fast weishaupt1776 Health 11 05-13-2005 10:11 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:59 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer