Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 2tim215
It's amazing to me that they have stopped posting. I wonder why? Maybe they have no responses to some of the points which were made. Maybe it's a sign they concur. Don't need to use the ignore feature if they are no longer posting. Hmm. It must be pretty difficult to try and fight truth. Truth is one of the greatest fears of evil and one of our greatest weapons against injustice.
2tim215
2 Timothy 2:15 (KJV) Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
|
This is true. Within the limited scope of Shoonra's perception (wherein she cites the US Supreme Court as supreme) she thinks she is right too. By responding to her posts at all you build the notion of appearance which of course cures jurisdiction under her bench. At the very best you mistrain your court procedures to pander into the common subjectivity. I am certain most Readers would quit if they only understood what I am saying here.
No problem reading their posts unless you are like me and you sometimes cannot resist the temptation to appear in writing (even in cyberspace).
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shoonra - hearsay of Rottweiler
The US Supreme Court had held that automobiles are inherently dangerous, more dangerous than the old horse and buggy, and that is one of many reasons why the state has the responsibility and authority to regulate who is allowed to steer a motor vehicle onto the public roads.
It's worth keeping in mind that with an automobile, the machine is being directed entirely by the driver. With a horse, there were some things a horse wasn't stupid enough to do no matter how drunk, blind or reckless his rider. Eliminating the horse from the equation subtracted (at least) half the brains that were directing the vehicle.
|
Comprehend that you are to refuse the quotation as valid because it does not meet the Rules of Evidence. If you accept what I say that Rottweiler said Shoonra said then you have no competence.
In other words, Shoonra is here to project her world of post 1938
Erie Doctrine as (federal) common law.
I produced living testimony of a genuine suitor living his life in peace and producing on his allodial claim. I interjected the video snippet into one thread and started another thread. After a few days I realized you folks have not the tools or experience to understand why these people do not take the trouble to write here on suijuris. It is because you entertain the illusions that attack them by color of law and authority. [Having to spend another $25 for Registered Mail costs to Refuse for Cause another pink doorknob notice to call their inspectors to come tell them how to live life.]
And you do it by arguing with Shoonra, Skeptic62, Judge Roy Bean, AndyK, B Rookard and UGA Lawdog.
Yesterday morning I decided that with you misdirecting and maliciously mistraining your court processes so, I am wasting my time here too. The above listed have won. They for the most part got together and decided to apply this tactic, likely led by JRB, a professional expert at
attorning innocents from the original estate into the counterfeit estate.
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/land-o...-allodium.html
Regards,
David Merrill.
