Nebraska

[jekylisland]

1. ask for pre-plea discovery. did the arresting officer take an oath to uphold the Consitution? has he read the Constitution? how can he uphold it if he hasn't read it? you can imagine where you can go from there.

2. what evidence does the prosecution that you are required to have a driver's license? were you driving a motor vehicle, or operating a passenger automobile?

3. who are you? who is the defendant? are you the same? what evidence do they have for thier position on that?

4. if you must plead, plead "guilty to the well plead facts (there are none)", or nolo contendre.

5. don't testify. debtor/defendants testify in admiralty, creditors/plaintiff's do not. debtor/defendants always lose. only ask questions. creditors/plaintiffs ask questions. for example, judge: do you understand your rights? creditor/plaintiff: I understand I have unalienable rights given by a Creator God, are those the ones to which you are referring?

[jekylisland]

forgot

6. Counterclaim through Negative Averment. I am not aware of evidence that defendant and I are the same.

I am not aware of eveidence that I volunteered corporation sole to the defendant.

I am not aware of evidence that I am surety for the defendant.

[charlesa6]

Jekylisland, your thoughts can hold a lots of water if done properly.

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by charlesa6

Jekylisland, your thoughts can hold a lots of water if done properly.

I would agree but the items will be ruled irrelevant unless you stick to the definitions within the Revised Statutes about the charge. And they will fail to define the distinction between common and commercial carrier; which is crucial to the argument.

The argument of identity is rendered moot by even arguing the definitions. So if you are going to argue identity; don't argue. Abate the nuisance for misnomer.


Regards,

David Merrill.