Letter To DMV Rescinding Reg - Page 2

charlesa6 · #11 09-04-2006, 11:12 AM

I agree with rottweiler, precisely stated.

Shoonra · #12 09-04-2006, 11:58 AM

I do not think that the Supreme Court has said that motoring on the public roads is always "commercial" but it has said that it is an activity that always carries risks to public safety and therefore the state has the authority and responsibility, through its police powers, to exert some reasonable regulation of the public highways and the vehicles (both commercial and noncommercial) allowed on them.

The letter that began this thread is a waste of time (at best) legally because there is NO way that one can motor* on the public roads without the required evidence that (1) the vehicle has been found to be roadworthy and (2) he is permitted to operate a vehicle on the public roads. Taking the tags off a car and then bringing that car onto the public roads is a sure way to attract a cop. When that cop also finds out that the man behind the wheel doesn't have the required documents that show that it's his car and that he's allowed to drive it, things can become very tedious very fast.
-----
*QUESTION: Since so many of you seem to think that "driving" is a loaded word that applies only to "commercial" operation of a vehicle, kindly supply me with the appropriate term for steering a vehicle on the public roads for non-commercial purposes. "Traveling" has been repeatedly used but it doesn't convey any distinction between sitting behind the wheel or sitting in the back seat.

rentiap · #13 09-04-2006, 12:08 PM

How about Navigate.

rottweiler · #14 09-04-2006, 02:39 PM

http://georgegordon.net/Radio_Archives.htm#Archives
Open the July 23rd(Admiralty Part 1 of 7)archived program. Start listening at the 56 minute mark. Can you see why horse and buggies are not licensed, registered and insured and why the automobile is?

charlesa6 · #15 09-04-2006, 03:49 PM

Yeah, it’s a lot of listening to do.

rottweiler · #16 09-04-2006, 06:18 PM

2 minutes is a lot?

Quote:

Originally Posted by charlesa6

Yeah, it’s a lot of listening to do.

charlesa6 · #17 09-04-2006, 06:38 PM

I mean the whole sets 1-7.

rottweiler · #18 09-04-2006, 07:22 PM

Ok, did you listen to the two minutes? That is all that matters for the subject of this thread. Can you find the Supreme McKenzie case of 1914? I can't find it so if someone can post a link I would appreciate it. I have listened to all 2000+ hours of his archives since the 1990's used to up there too. No matter how hard I tried or disagreed with him I could never find one single instance of him being wrong and he has never went to prison! He is trying to get the Supremes to change the usual and ordinary mode of trans from the horse and buggy to the auto since the Supreme's still operate on the definition from 1914!

Quote:

Originally Posted by charlesa6

I mean the whole sets 1-7.

rottweiler · #19 09-04-2006, 07:25 PM

This $hit is too complicated for the average Joe that's why the King kicks our collective asses in court when we fight it. Good luck.

Shoonra · #20 09-05-2006, 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rottweiler

Ok, did you listen to the two minutes? That is all that matters for the subject of this thread. Can you find the Supreme McKenzie case of 1914? I can't find it so if someone can post a link I would appreciate it.... He is trying to get the Supremes to change the usual and ordinary mode of trans from the horse and buggy to the auto since the Supreme's still operate on the definition from 1914!

There was a US Supreme Court decision, Mackenzie v. Hare (Dec. 6, 1915) 239 US 299, which dealt with the citizenship of an American woman who married a foreigner. That's the nearest McKenzie I can find.

I would appreciate it if someone would provide a written transcript of those two minutes of radio.