traffic court today

[KingC]

I went in today. I asked the judge to view the paperwork i filed from ticketslayer. He looked kind of shocked and he told the court to take a recess while he view the paperwork. He seem to have a sort of big shot attitutude until he seen the docs. It was pathetic how he tried to butter me up to get an attorney. He requested i leave and get an attorney so i have to go back on may 10th.

This guy that was there recognized the paperwork but it was similar to what he has used before but not in a traffic case because he is a law student. The judge says he didn't recognize the paperwork and he tried to turn the motion to dismiss into a motion to quash and supress evidence. He said the legal words in the rest of the paper work he doesn't understand because thats not the words they use. The guy i was talking to said it might be a defect in my work so i should go over it. I filed the motion and the mandamus today which i was suppose to give them time.

question?? could i file the paperwork over to make sure nothing is wrong or just wait until they probably dismiss the case?

[weishaupt1776]

Just keep going with the process. Thye're already in default. after everything is said and done, the default is water under the bridge. the only issue is what will the judge do about the mandamus?

[KingC]

I filed the motion to dismiss and the writ mandamus today.

Was that to close together to file both those documents. I did it because they was in default anyway. So what is the rest of the process??

I have my marc stevens questions ready in case they want to try me.

the guy that recognized the process said something about Right Way Law. com and how they almost won a 100 thousand dollar case but failed to put it in the court of record.

[brozer5]

Originally Posted by KingC

I filed the motion to dismiss and the writ mandamus today.

Was that to close together to file both those documents. I did it because they was in default anyway. So what is the rest of the process??

I have my marc stevens questions ready in case they want to try me.

the guy that recognized the process said something about Right Way Law. com and how they almost won a 100 thousand dollar case but failed to put it in the court of record.

which friends of mine have successfully used.

I went back and saw this is just traffic; don't go in deeper with redemption; just MHO.

[Lawyerdude]

You mentioned that you went to court today on a traffic ticket. Where did you go to court? What crime have they accused you of?
Here is how to win:
Lawyerdude: 541 476 8954 Lawyerdude1989@yahoo.com Click here to go to my links at bottom of page. Jan 7, 2006.

This page is http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/7260.html

GoStats.com
Free Hit Counter

Big Fat Total Explanation of How to Win Your Case!

Step-by-Step Instructions How to Win without a trial!

Empower Yourself!

Embrace your Case!

Lots of Links to Winning Motions.

Copyright. 2005. Attorney Douglas Palaschak. Lawyerdude is a trademark/ service mark of Attorney Douglas Palaschak.

You may reprint / repost this page if you leave the links intact.



1. If I can boil it all down to one word: Demurrer: http://lawyerdude.8k.com/5736.html I have never lost with a demurrer! Well, I may have lost the demurrer in the Extradition case but I won at trial: http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/5918.html .



2. You must try very hard to win your case before even making a plea. The trial is merely a legal formality before the hanging.



3. The first thing that anybody needs in a criminal case is the police reports. The second thing is a list of the charges. Print out each of the statutes that you are charged with offending. Often the remedy will pop into your head in the form of “Hey, I didn’t do that!”



4. Let’s use a basketball analogy: Generally the goal is to try to keep dribbling until you get a good shot; similarly you schedule a motion each month until you find a dead-bang-winner motion. Or you could use a poker analogy: In a poker tournament you must learn to fold over 90% of your hands - until you have a winner; similarly you will fold/ vacate on most of your motions when you get a getter motion. You can read how this worked on in Charlie’s case: http://www.fu.gq.nu/charlie.html



5. Challenge the “pocket warrant/ pocket summons: http://www.fu.gq.nu/6947.html How convenience it would be if you could hand out a summons immediately whenever a person would injure or offend you. Well, this is just what cops to. They give you a summons before there is even any case pending. That’s an unfair advantage. At the scene of the car crash you should be able to hand the bad driver a summons to appear in court. Instead you must go find a lawyer and have him do it and take 1/3 of your money. But the cop gives you a summons right at the scene of every ticket. Well, hey, News Flash! What the cop gives you can’t be a summons because there has not been any case filed yet! I wrote a motion in that regard. Although legislature has given then the apparent authority and the petty traffic commissioners haven't a clue, we nonetheless have supervening constitutional rights. Also, what is sauce for the goose is good for the gander also. That is why I turned the tables by writing an "Instant Summons" for you to give to the cop. Then he may astutely observe "Hey, you can't give me that summons until you have filed in the federal court!" To which you would reply "And you cannot begin a case in state court! Only a prosecutor can prosecute a crime, misdemeanor or infraction!" Here is that summons if you want to put some copies in your glove box: http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/6091.html Incidentally the Supreme Court has ruled regarding "pocket warrants" in the context of taxes a year ago in the Bob Schulz case. In Minnesota traffic court I argued that issue. Here is that motion: http://www.fu.gq.nu/6947.html I found a big fat article about "pocket warrants: http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/6918.html



6. Often there will be no complaint. Often the complaint will be unsigned - or “signed” with a rubber stamp. That is objectionable. Often there will be a complaint signed by a mysterious mystery person, maybe a police liaison. Often it will be signed by a prosecutor. That is statutorily permissible but not under common law. Object. It should be “an information” in such case. Theo did a good motion regarding the specifications for a complaint. They are in the penal code. Remind me. I will find it. You may want to demand a grand jury. Overturn Hurtado. It is ripe to be overturned. http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/Hurtado.html



7. The key is writing good motions. I show you how with copious illustrations in “Motions 101": http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/6025.html



8. Usually you will file a medley of motions over a 6 to 12 month period. The motions may be in an order like this:

a. Bail reduction motion. Actually this is one thing that public defenders can actually do!

b. Demand for effective assistance of counsel ala Harrison Cronic http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/5698.html or Strickland http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/5699.html .

c. Demand to speak for yourself: Faretta, Marsden motions.

d. Discovery motion; don’t plea until you have discovery. http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/6315.html

e. Challenge to court jurisdiction also known as Skateboard or Humvee Motion in the form of a demurrer http://www.fu.gq.nu/6756.html They are all listed at the foregoing link and here is that list:

i. Cadillac Motion from Steve Laubly: http://www.laubly.com/cadillac.htm

ii. Skateboard Motion from Charlie Sprinkle. This motion has never lost ! http://www.lawyerdude.s5.com/6393.html

iii. Skateboard Motion improved by Theo. He won ! http://www.fu.gq.nu/theodem.html

iv. Humvee Motion by Cyril. Beautiful motion that has won so far: : http://www.fu.gq.nu/6974.pdf Must click through the Humvee motion to get to it.

v. Humvee motion converted for use in all states: http://www.fu.gq.nu/humvee.html



f. Overbreadth Motion in the form of a demurrer. Discussed below. http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5409.html http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5428.html I have some overbreadth motions. Let me know if you cannot find them. My sleeping in a car motions is an overbreadth motion.

g. Demands for a free e-transcript of the arraignment and every hearing since then. See my pages regarding Griffith v Illinois and MLB v SLJ. They are both Supreme Court cases regarding transcript. Google for em. Also: http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/shelton.html

h. Motion to Suppress Evidence - which you will appeal before trial if you lose. Discussed below. Your dead bang winner motion will usually be a motion to suppress evidence !

i. A right2drive motion: http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/right2drive.html



9. Please observe that the case is best won BEFORE you even plead not guilty! If your public defender has already pleaded then move to withdraw the plea because he did not have authority from you to plea! Motion to withdraw is common law but also statutory in California at PC 1018 as I recall. Also you may file an application for Writ of Error Coram Nobis: http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/392.html



10. I may perfect this page some day. Until then, you may have questions. Do not hesitate to call me day or night. 541 476 8954. I work late. Or email me: Dlawyerdude1989@yahoo.com My phone number and email may have changed by the time that you read this. You can find the new number on newer pages. See the 4 digit number in the upper left hand corner? That is the serial number. Later serial numbers have updated phone numbers. This page was written on Jan 2, 2006.



11. On this page I may mention a page without linking to it. However, the link will usually appear in my list of links at the bottom of the page. Some day I may perfect this page by adding more links at the right place. Until then, please take a look at all the link at the bottom of this page. I wrote em for you!



12. If you have a public defender or a real lawyer or if you are in jail, then tell em what the Lawyerdude Standard is:

http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/5635.html



13. Here are some “dead bang winner” motions that won drunk driving cases in Seattle and California:



a. Dead bang winner motion: Forrest Bishop motion: http://www.fu.gq.nu/6751supp.html

b. Dead bang winner motion: Buzz Vieau motion: http://www.lawyerdude.s5.com/5790.html

c. These motions won for Charlie although he never did have a hearing on the motion. Take a lesson: You can win better without having a hearing! Give the overcrowded court enough time a rope to screw up its own case. Just play along until you win by attrition. That is the main plan! : http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/5686.html and http://www.landrights.com/The%20Char...ler%20File.htm http://laubly.com/charlie.htm



14. Here is a list of the twenty or so most frequently used motions in a criminal case: http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/motions.html



15. Find book of criminal motions in the law library. How do you think that I learned to do this stuff? I learned from a book of motions. Also, read my fat web page with illustrations of the elements of a criminal motion: http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/6025.html

There is more but this message box only holds so many characters. Click on the link at the top to read the entire version on my web page.

[hardtoremember]

I think at this point this is starting to look like spam.

Originally Posted by Lawyerdude

You mentioned that you went to court today on a traffic ticket. Where did you go to court? What crime have they accused you of?
Here is how to win:
Lawyerdude: 541 476 8954 Lawyerdude1989@yahoo.com Click here to go to my links at bottom of page. Jan 7, 2006.

This page is http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/7260.html

GoStats.com
Free Hit Counter

Big Fat Total Explanation of How to Win Your Case!

Step-by-Step Instructions How to Win without a trial!

Empower Yourself!

Embrace your Case!

Lots of Links to Winning Motions.

Copyright. 2005. Attorney Douglas Palaschak. Lawyerdude is a trademark/ service mark of Attorney Douglas Palaschak.

You may reprint / repost this page if you leave the links intact.

[Akira]

KingC,

It would have been wise to submit the Writ of Pracipe & Writ of Mandamus, and MtD when you submitted the Final Default.

Make sure your docs are good before you do anything else. Get the opinion of several people who have had successes with them (send me a set). If they're fine, you have already won, and there is no more to the process. If they're flawed, you can redo them without hurting your case.

Once they've defaulted, you're the one in control of the court. You have stated you are sovereign, and they have failed to rebutt. That makes you the boss (principle) and the judge your servant (agent) via common law contract (the Constitution) The judge has no choice. As Weis stated, the only question before the court becomes will the court act on my Writ of Mandamus, or leave that to a higher court.

Stand your ground.


For HIS Glory,
Akira

[Judge Roy Bean]

Originally Posted by KingC

I went in today. I asked the judge to view the paperwork i filed from ticketslayer. He looked kind of shocked and he told the court to take a recess while he view the paperwork. He seem to have a sort of big shot attitutude until he seen the docs. It was pathetic how he tried to butter me up to get an attorney. He requested i leave and get an attorney so i have to go back on may 10th.

He's mostl likely trying to prevent you from being hung for filing frivolous nonsense. You as a pro se defendant can get away with a lot of crap and may not be slapped with contempt or sanctions. As I've told people before, it's a matter of how much patience the Judge has for schemes and the people who buy into them.

Originally Posted by KingC

This guy that was there recognized the paperwork but it was similar to what he has used before but not in a traffic case because he is a law student. The judge says he didn't recognize the paperwork and he tried to turn the motion to dismiss into a motion to quash and supress evidence. He said the legal words in the rest of the paper work he doesn't understand because thats not the words they use. The guy i was talking to said it might be a defect in my work so i should go over it. I filed the motion and the mandamus today which i was suppose to give them time.

A mandamus is meaningless unless you've exhausted your appeal processes. Since there hasn't been a ruling you're in legal lallaland with something like that.

Originally Posted by KingC

question?? could i file the paperwork over to make sure nothing is wrong or just wait until they probably dismiss the case?

You won't know anything until the May 10th session, and there won't be a dismissal unless the prosecutor's office is a bunch of chimpanzees.

I think the judge was giving you an opportunity to try and rescue yourself from a whacko defense you paid for. One that he or she probably already knows about but won't slap you around unless you keep standing there trying to argue about it.

[Jerseee]

That is correct Judge (about the Mandamus)!!!

I do recall that the Mandamus is used after the appeal process--however, the way the Mandamus is used here is more like a notice or assistance versus a command.

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by Judge Roy Bean

I think the judge was giving you an opportunity to try and rescue yourself from a whacko defense you paid for. One that he or she probably already knows about but won't slap you around unless you keep standing there trying to argue about it.

Now wait just a minute... this TicketSlayer paperwork succeeds 95% of the time (at least according to promoters and quite a few testimonies here). I guess that is just a glimpse into Judge Roy Bean's resume...

http://www.quatloos.com/Tax-Forums/p...profile&u=3009


Regards,

David Merrill.