Travel Discuss how to reclaim the right to travel freely, public access, etc.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Travel
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-31-2006, 02:06 AM
ezrhythm ezrhythm is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,212
Send a message via AIM to ezrhythm Send a message via Yahoo to ezrhythm
Letter To DMV Rescinding Reg

I discovered this on: http://www.state-citizen.org/files/generalresecisson/
File name: vehlicre.zip (It's just one short file)

How does it look or does just writing "JUNKED" across the reg. and mailing that in suffice?


Certified Mail # Dated
Program Manager
Department of Motor Vehicles

Sacramento, California


ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE


Mr. [Program Manager]:

Enclosed please find License Plate _______ ,
certificate of ownership (pink slip),
and a copy of the Bill of Sale, wherein I, ______________ ,
have purchased a _________________.
The plates and registration are hereby returned, revoked and
cancelled due to the use of non-disclosure and fraud by the State
of California. This conveyance is my private property, and there
are no 2nd or 3rd party interests in said vehicle. (See exhibit C).
This vehicle is not used in commerce nor in any other revenue
taxable activity. I am not a federal employee who possesses a
social security number, and regulatable under the purview of the
so-called 14th Amendment.

The intent of the original vehicle registration code, was
that it was for the return of the vehicle, if stolen, or otherwise
lost. This was so the vehicle could be properly identified as to
who the owner was, and there were no other secret attachments to
deprive anyone of their liberty or property. This is no longer the
intent of the law, it has been perverted. It is presently being
used in a conspiracy by the State to signify and denote a
juristic/commercial person, a Federal citizen of the United States
under the 14th Amendment, or a common law Citizen involved in a
revenue taxable activity. I am none of the above described
"persons".

Under Vehicle Code 17459, which establishes that
accepting a certificate of ownership or registration is voluntary,
and consent is given to the State in the form of power of attorney.
All such power of attorney and authority over this vehicle has been
revoked. (See Exhibit A). This conveyance has been and shall
continue to be used for my own pleasure and personal reasons, as a
freeborn California Citizen under Article IV, 1 of the
Constitution of the United State of America, as espoused in Dred
Scott v. Sanford, 19 How. 393 and Van Valkenburg v. Brown, 43 Cal.
Sup. Ct. 43, and under the protection of the Constitution of the
State of California (1849).

I shall display the vehicle identification number (VIN) in
the rear window, so as to properly identify my personal property,
and to signify that the state has no interest in my property.

Therefore, under the above guidelines, which establishes
certain "facts" and imputes "knowledge", you are mandated to update
your computer so that it reflects that VIN , is not
required to be registered, and the registration requirements as
established by the State for commercial revenue purposes do not
apply. This vehicle is not involved in any revenue taxable
activity, nor will it ever carry any "passengers" whatsoever. I
may from time to time carry "guests" of my choice.

Please send me proper notice reflecting the above, so that
I will not be unnecessarily harassed by any revenue officers which
includes law enforcement types, who may attempt to enforce a
nonexistent contract upon me. Your failure to do this may cause me
damage and injury, in which you will be held personally accountable
and liable.

This document is hereby executed under Civil Code 18, 19
by service of certified mail, and as such shall be judicially
noticed in any and all proceedings legal or otherwise, that may be
initiated by anyone for any and all reasons.


Respectfully Submitted







Witness my hand this day of , 1990





STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )

On this day of , in the year 1990, before me,
the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of
California, personally appeared ,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the
Citizen who subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to
me that he executed it.


Witness my hand and official seal.



Notary Public
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-31-2006, 05:25 AM
Shoonra Shoonra is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,745
I strenuously recommend AGAINST doing this. You'll be driving around without the proper tags on your car nor the necessary evidence to show that it's yours. You are sure to be stopped by the cops, and as there is no evidence that the car is roadworthy or that it's your car, they are very likely to impound the car and take you in.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-31-2006, 06:50 AM
ezrhythm ezrhythm is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,212
Send a message via AIM to ezrhythm Send a message via Yahoo to ezrhythm
Proper tags? Proper for whom?

No evidence? With Bill of Sale in hand?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-31-2006, 07:39 AM
theghost theghost is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 228
ezrythm, I hate to say it, but I kinda agree with shoonra on this one (did I just say that?), only in that the cops will probably pull you over to investigate out of their tyopical ignorance. I'm not saying that you couldn't defend your position and eventually triumph. Just think of cops as the revenue-generating drones that they are. As for your notice, I'd shorten it up a bit if you really plan to do this. From the paragraph that mentions the vehicle code on is sufficient. Can you unregister and rescind your signature, especially where full disclosure was never given? Of course you can. You didn't register it for life anyway, that's why they make you re-register every year, it's a 1 year contract, repeated and re-offered every year. You could just let it lapse, but I don't think you'd get the same results. The only edition I might make to the notice would be to demand the manufacturers certificate of origin back from them. This, plus the bill of sale, would be strong evidence of superior title. As much as I agree with this process, one should consider the pros and cons of doing this, and weigh the potential hazards against the benefits before acting. Another option would be to register the car in anothers name, or put it into a trust, if it's the name thing you're most concerned about (not having the tags come up in your name when pulled over by the revenue drones).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-31-2006, 08:00 AM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,323
A certificate of search from the US District Court on the vehicle by VIN is the only thing I have seen work. And they kept the car for 14 months before offering it back.

Abating the nuisance is easy but you are in the court of James Keller, the Impound Yard Manager around here. That is Freemasonry - Lodge #9; The Fraternal Order of Police. They are the owners of the Impound Yard.

After they got tired or bored with trying to figure out how to legally sell the car they stole they offered it back. When I put the CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report) into the court record in 2000 they buzzed me with the police helecopter for about 15 minutes. They did not want the breakout on the court record and in the trial the magistrate was sure that never happened.

Think about that conflict of interest for a moment. The police officer might just be thinking he has enough cash in account to go buy that nice car from James in a few weeks. So let's turn on the flashing lights and see if it has been forfeited by a statutory violation too? It has already been forfeited to the State anyway - look at the Title; it is only a Certificate of Title.


Regards,

David Merrill.

Last edited by David Merrill : 08-31-2006 at 08:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-31-2006, 08:26 AM
charlesa6's Avatar
charlesa6 charlesa6 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoonra
I strenuously recommend AGAINST doing this. You'll be driving around without the proper tags on your car nor the necessary evidence to show that it's yours. You are sure to be stopped by the cops, and as there is no evidence that the car is roadworthy or that it's your car, they are very likely to impound the car and take you in.
I agree with shoonra. You are raising the red flag for poilice to pull you over when your car is not in order.
__________________
Resolution pending
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-31-2006, 08:37 AM
jekylisland jekylisland is offline
Waking Up
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 30
ownership or possession?

Why all this concern about title?

God gave Men and Women stewardship of His Creation, but retained ownership for Himself. Even if you are successful in obtaining lawful, allodial title, whose to say they won't take it from you anyway?

Screaming at the top of your lungs that this "vehicle" is your "personal property", puts you in their jurisdiction on two counts. First, vehicles are used for commercial purposes which they have jurisdiction over. Secondly, person, persona, personal... puts you in their jurisdiction as well.

Why not let the juristic person have colorable, equitable title (Certificate of Title), and let the same juristic person have a driver's license, and you (the Living Soul) learn how to discharge all obligations and liabilities associated therewith?

Enjoy the possession and stewardship your Creator gave you, and live in Peace!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-02-2006, 03:41 PM
Judge Roy Bean's Avatar
Judge Roy Bean Judge Roy Bean is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 901
The letter is nothing more than an excercise with no legal effect.
__________________
The Honorable Judge Roy Bean
Creditoris Squaliformes
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-04-2006, 06:58 AM
palani's Avatar
palani palani is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,039
Quote:
The letter is nothing more than an excercise with no legal effect.

Undoubtably a true statement. Would you care to elaborate more exactly just why a signed notarized document has no legal effect? Does it have lawful effect?
__________________
Its' a dog eat dog world and I am wearing milkbone underwear!!!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-04-2006, 11:08 AM
rottweiler's Avatar
rottweiler rottweiler is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: judicial district of tens: milwaukee: the county: commonwealth of Yisra'el
Posts: 2,616
I don't know the S.C. cases off the top of my head but using a auto on public roads is considered being in commerce and the Gov. can regulate that since autos are not a normal means of transportation. If you were talking about a horse and wagon I think you would be likely to prevail.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UCC 1-207, Code & Cites suijuris UCC 48 10-16-2008 01:57 PM
WARNING about a particular IRS Letter rushpat Taxation 57 08-25-2008 08:15 AM
CONFESSION OF JUDGEMENT BY NIHIL DICIT suijuris Court 23 03-11-2008 10:53 PM
Ed Rivera's "brief" on Article III David Merrill Articles & News 44 11-26-2007 08:02 AM
From The Archives SKYGZR Taxation 0 07-10-2004 03:20 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:16 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer