09-05-2007, 11:16 AM
|
 |
Practice Makes Perfect
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 302
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by palani
Possibly because she didn't play well with other truth seekers; potty penmenship, abusive sentence construction, argumentative texting, ad hominem.
|
Yes, unfortunately these are all true. Except Cody is a "he". Phenomenal ideas and arguments though.
__________________
Peace,
-Gabe
For educational purposes only, not to be construed as legal advice.
No liability assumed, no value assured, without recourse.
He who does not assert his rights, has none.
Oh, and in case you're wondering - the profile picture is really me.
|
12-06-2007, 08:43 PM
|
 |
Banned User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 363
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by redy2fiyt
Yes, unfortunately these are all true. Except Cody is a "he". Phenomenal ideas and arguments though.
|
Yeah, kind of agree. |
12-06-2007, 08:47 PM
|
|
Banned User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 363
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ezrhythm
In order to be a "person" as within this California (and most other states) vehicle code, you must be ALL of the definition's adjectives. Otherwise they would put "or" in between the adjectives of the definition. Are you a firm AND a partnership AND a corporation AND a trust?
|
Absolutely wrong.
"A natural person" is used specifically in counter distinction to all of the other adjectives in the list. 10 oxymoronic statements in a row do not equal a valid presumption of the law. |
12-06-2007, 08:53 PM
|
|
Banned User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 363
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gldskr
Codee
Your essay is entitled "Discussions on the Legislative Intent of Amendments of Definitions...". If each of these acts subsequent to the Motor Vehicle Act of 1905 are simply amendments and it has not been repealed, then the legislative intent of that act is still binding today no matter how incongruous the past and present acts may be. Have you found any evidence that an entire act has been repealed and replaced with a new one?
|
I think of it as using a development of a term in commerce.
When a term has been given meaning in commerce then it retains that meaning OVER common meanings.
I discovered this once when I was about 14 when ?I was looking up whether a tomato was fruit or a vegetable and I found a SCOTUS case stating that although it was scientifically a fruit, "Tomato" had been given a commercial context of "vegetable" that would be binding on commercial litigation with statutes employing the term "tomato".
Now if I can show that the entire code had a commercial context to it and that some of the words did too... that might be another way of looking at this for remedy? ;)
Last edited by Ownmaster : 12-06-2007 at 09:52 PM.
|
12-06-2007, 09:48 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,128
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ownmaster
"A natural person" is used specifically in counter distinction to all of the other adjectives in the list.
|
I stand corrected.
__________________
Any fool can hire an attorney. It takes a touch of genius-and a lot of courage-to move in the opposite direction.
Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, following the tradition of men according to the rudiments of the world, and not in accordance with Christ.
To view other forums or create a new thread; While viewing any thread scroll down to the bottom right hand side. Select from Forum Jump.
|
12-06-2007, 09:50 PM
|
|
Banned User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 363
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ezrhythm
I stand corrected.
|
But other then that you made good points.
Thank you for your input.
Hmmm.... Well I have more direct research in my court thread. |
01-29-2008, 04:35 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,702
|
|
|
Another success story
A Colorado man, who claimed that being "a state citizen" but denied being a U.S. citizen, enabled him to drive without a DL is the most recent winner of free room and board (five days, but his cases ,ay not be over).
He made it easy on the police, because they had watched him drive away from hearings at which he was told he couldn't drive without a DL.
http://www.journal-advocate.com/arti...ews/local3.txt |
01-29-2008, 05:40 PM
|
 |
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 676
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shoonra
A Colorado man, who claimed that being "a state citizen" but denied being a U.S. citizen, enabled him to drive without a DL is the most recent winner of free room and board (five days, but his cases ,ay not be over).
He made it easy on the police, because they had watched him drive away from hearings at which he was told he couldn't drive without a DL.
http://www.journal-advocate.com/arti...ews/local3.txt |
Shoonra,
Who is the injured party? How was anyone harmed or threatened? I suppose 5 days in jail is justice in your mind. Seeing that you posted this in more than one thread, I am quite sure you're taking joy in this man's dilemma.
It is clear from the information and reports by Cody and others that people are winning against improper application of administrative law. It's too bad this man did not.
__________________
Liberty: Freedom from restraint and the power to follow one's own will to choose a course of conduct. Liberty, like freedom, has its inherent restraint to act without harm to others and within the accepted rules of conduct for the benefit of the general public.
|
01-29-2008, 06:06 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,128
|
|
|
Now She-ra is going to start cross-thread posting nonsense and hi-jack threads.
You are an enemy of those seeking remedy here!
__________________
Any fool can hire an attorney. It takes a touch of genius-and a lot of courage-to move in the opposite direction.
Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, following the tradition of men according to the rudiments of the world, and not in accordance with Christ.
To view other forums or create a new thread; While viewing any thread scroll down to the bottom right hand side. Select from Forum Jump.
|
01-30-2008, 03:54 AM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,702
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FreeFromContract
Shoonra,
Who is the injured party? How was anyone harmed or threatened?
|
There is a definite, if unmeasurable, impairment of the quality of life if unfit drivers or unfit vehicles are allowed on the road. Not touching an unqualified driver until after he kills or cripples somebody is inviting tragedy. |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:04 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
|
|
