STRAWMAN TM and other fictions

[Bulletproof Monk]

BULLETPROOF MONK TM, STRAWMAN TM, but I agree, not copyright. The only reason I use the TM is to make a distiction (and by the way I did register my all caps strawman as a trademark and it was accepted so becomes an (R). But then I failed to pay the $400, letting it slide, as I wasn't sure about ownership and liability.

When somebody attempts to write in all caps or use the STRAWMAN I simply point out that "that's not me...I know it happens to look like my name, but in fact it's a limited liability legal fiction/trademark and intellectual property owned and administered by company XYZ".

I now have all of my main documents or cards including my passport/port pass (yes we are self loading baggage going from one air-port or sea-port to another as commercial goods of exchange) as follows:

STRAWMAN (your all caps) TM
by
actual signature, Agent. All Rights Reserved.

It took a hell of a long time to get it on my passport, and in the end they asked if I had any other ID with it on...of course I did.

Even my library card now says STRAWMAN TM with me on the back signing as the agent.

Once you can get one, you can get another, then all of them.

It's helpful to create the seperation, for yourself importantly, and for others. Otherwise you get stupid cops like the one I had last week (who had to ask me to spell "inpersonam juristiction" when I said I would not grant it,) saying "it doesn't matter how you spell your name..."

Of course you can't argue your name is spelled differently, because you're still saying it's your name.

I have a new sovereign ID now, and to my surprise, when I posted something overseas lately, and they usually ask for your licence, I produced my sovereign, official looking ID, and she entered THAT number into the computer. No questions.

I'll upload it as a template so you can make your own, after all, who's going to tell you who you are?

BULLETPROOF

[charlesa6]

Good job, bulletproof. Welcome to the club.

[ezrhythm]

Way to go and Thanks for sharing!

EZ

[powder]

Thanks Bulletproof Monk. I look forward to seeing the ID.

[ezrhythm]

This is a post from a member on lawfulremedies@yahoogroups.com;

As I stated earlier, there is a strawman in play - it is called a US Trust.

That also is fraud and is why they can never answer a jurisdicitional challenge on statutory issues - the presumption of authority is based completely upon fraud.

I don't have the statutes at hand but I have seen some of them posted in different sites. The first one I saw was from Louisiana some years back. It was found and published by the redemption people.

It seemed pretty close to the truth and I believed it for awhile but the more I looked at the overall picture I realized that regulation imposed went beyond the commerce clause powers.

A couple of years ago we got a judge in Oregon to state in writing that the upper case name was a US Trust - which fits.

The gov brings all claims in its own name and not in the name of the people. That is a sovereign action by the gov and not a common law action. Even under the commerce clause that would not appear to fly.

In Oregon, the ORS actually states that all non-common law crimes are "political offenses."

It does not say commercial - it says political.

[planetmark]

Originally Posted by ezrhythm

This is a post from a member on lawfulremedies@yahoogroups.com;

As I stated earlier, there is a strawman in play - it is called a US Trust.

My understanding (best I've figgured yet), is that the ALL CAPS name was created with the SSN application. Since it is created and exists within the Social Security TRUST Fund, as a sub-account therein, it therefore in reality is a Trust Account. And since the SSN is your Federal ID (tax payer ID, etc), and since the STATE OF XXX is a sub-corp of the Corp US, and this SSN/Trust Account Number is how the entire system deals with "persons", the "strawman" in reality is a "Trust". Therefore, logically, the UPPERCASE NAME is not you, but is legally a Trust that you are trustee/agent for.

So, it makes sense to me that the correct path to persue is essentially what bulletproof monk has done - go register this Trust, and then sign docs and ID with "agent" or "trustee" or "TTEE" or similar. This will establish to all the world that the two are NOT the same, and therefore there is no argument about "how you spell YOUR name". It's not MY name. It's a trust, I'm the agent/trustee, IT is not me. Then it naturally follows that I do not have an SSN, the Trust has an SSN, the Trust has a driver's license, the Trust has a bank account, etc. I have none of these, as I am not and cannot be a "taxpayer" or a legal fiction, I am real.

Now when the convert your name to uppercase, they are legally referring to the Trust. Did the Trust do what they are accusing you of doing? Was the Trust driving the car too fast, or were you? They would have to prove the Trust was driving, which is absurd. Or they would have to bring charges against you in your natural capacity, which their statutes cannot do since you are not a "person". That should gimp up their process real good.

[powder]

I have currently taken the position that the strawman is either a corporate entity created by the government based on the birth certificate or it is a trust.

I really don't care at this point. I am going to/have (can't remember) issue a honorary irrevocable power of attorney from strawman to living man.

If I specify 'trust' or 'corporation' and they stipulate that the entity is the other, then "i maybe in hot water". However, it will just be a 'blanket' PoA....

From what I have learned so far (opinion) is that STRAWMAN is trust. SSN (or SIN) is a sub entity of trust, just like 'drivers license', 'bank accounts', and the like.

I believe the beneficiary of the trust to be the international bankers - but with some recent developments (on truth radio) the living man could be the beneficiary....

So far it makes logical sense that the living man is the settler -> breathing life into the trust and the international bankers are the beneficiaries -> because they created the entity, why wouldn't they benefit from it?

[clarkee]

Originally Posted by Bulletproof Monk

BULLETPROOF MONK TM, STRAWMAN TM, but I agree, not copyright. The only reason I use the TM is to make a distiction (and by the way I did register my all caps strawman as a trademark and it was accepted so becomes an (R). But then I failed to pay the $400, letting it slide, as I wasn't sure about ownership and liability.

When somebody attempts to write in all caps or use the STRAWMAN I simply point out that "that's not me...I know it happens to look like my name, but in fact it's a limited liability legal fiction/trademark and intellectual property owned and administered by company XYZ".

I now have all of my main documents or cards including my passport/port pass (yes we are self loading baggage going from one air-port or sea-port to another as commercial goods of exchange) as follows:

STRAWMAN (your all caps) TM
by
actual signature, Agent. All Rights Reserved.

It took a hell of a long time to get it on my passport, and in the end they asked if I had any other ID with it on...of course I did.

Even my library card now says STRAWMAN TM with me on the back signing as the agent.

Once you can get one, you can get another, then all of them.

It's helpful to create the seperation, for yourself importantly, and for others. Otherwise you get stupid cops like the one I had last week (who had to ask me to spell "inpersonam juristiction" when I said I would not grant it,) saying "it doesn't matter how you spell your name..."

Of course you can't argue your name is spelled differently, because you're still saying it's your name.

I have a new sovereign ID now, and to my surprise, when I posted something overseas lately, and they usually ask for your licence, I produced my sovereign, official looking ID, and she entered THAT number into the computer. No questions.

I'll upload it as a template so you can make your own, after all, who's going to tell you who you are?

BULLETPROOF

Hey Bullet: How ya doing? This is Wayne (Clarkee) and I was wondering if this has 2 do with the filing of the UCC. I've been out of town for a week, down to the Texas/Mexico border visiting some family so I've been away from the forum. Are you in New Zealand? If you are I'll still ask this stupid question: Since I am not a US Citizen (Born in Dallas, Texas) state national, would the US Constitution still include state nationals or just US Citizens. (Those born in DC, Virginia, Puerto Rico, Guam etc...) It seems to me that since the Feds don't have jurisdiction over me that my allegiance would be to the Texas Constitution. Sometime's Wayne think's too much into this and I end up confusing myself instead of taking things at face value. What's your thoughts if you don't mind me asking.

[planetmark]

Originally Posted by clarkee

Hey Bullet: How ya doing? This is Wayne (Clarkee) and I was wondering if this has 2 do with the filing of the UCC. I've been out of town for a week, down to the Texas/Mexico border visiting some family so I've been away from the forum. Are you in New Zealand? If you are I'll still ask this stupid question: Since I am not a US Citizen (Born in Dallas, Texas) state national, would the US Constitution still include state nationals or just US Citizens. (Those born in DC, Virginia, Puerto Rico, Guam etc...) It seems to me that since the Feds don't have jurisdiction over me that my allegiance would be to the Texas Constitution. Sometime's Wayne think's too much into this and I end up confusing myself instead of taking things at face value. What's your thoughts if you don't mind me asking.

The Constitution for the United States of America is specifically a limiting document created to organize, define, and then restrain "government" at the national level from infringing upon your rights and freedom. So, yes, in that regard it "appies" to you personally - in that it is supposed to protect you personally from this monster that is trying to consume us all.

If you were a "government" emplyee/officer, then it would "apply" to you directly, in that it would limit what you are allowed to do to We The People. There is nothing in the constitution that binds or obligates or regulates you as a free man, other than providing punishment if you commit tort crime against another sovereign free man.

[Bulletproof Monk]

Originally Posted by clarkee

Hey Bullet: How ya doing? This is Wayne (Clarkee) and I was wondering if this has 2 do with the filing of the UCC. Are you in New Zealand? What's your thoughts if you don't mind me asking.

Hi Wayne,

Couldn't be better, in fact I'm thinking of buying a house with my private excemption!

I'm in Australia, so not too sure on the UCC stuff, as we don't have it here. In fact I'm not sure what we have here??....you'll see in my posts under taxation labeled ATO supporting evidence, the research I did on the entity and all caps stuff, including definitions from many law books on persons and corporations. It was pretty conclusive.

Here's a snippett:

From the ATO form “Application to cancel registration” of an ABN number. (Australian Business Number)

“Entity” refers to the sole trader, partnership, company, trust, superannuation fund or other type of organisation that is applying to cancel its registration.

Definition: A “Sole Trader” is an individual.

When completing the form
■ Print clearly, using a black pen only.
■ Use BLOCK LETTERS and print one character in each box.
This will ensure that the entity’s details are recorded correctly.

(you're supposed to put your name in there!)

Notice "black ink"...I'm sure that's code for dead entity, machine language and printer output, not RED as in living mortal being / blood etc.

Definitions from the Corporations Act Australia:

“A sole trader is a member organisation of a securities exchange” (stock market)

“An individual is a natural person”

“A person is an individual, corporation or body corporate”

Therefore if you’re a PERSON, you’re a member organisation of a securities exchange.

International Travel (my definition)

"Self-loading commercial baggage bound for a foreign air or sea port, using a port-pass to identify the cargo, and subject to import/export duties warranting a securities exchange, of which you are a member, as collateral for the strawman, the country of export's re-source."

Bulletproof