Acceptance Process

[Jerry Pitts]

That be the correct one. Be sure to read the introductory pages, as it will give you a detailed history of his background. By knowing his background, you will also know that he is one that is speaking from true experience, and with enough legal knowledge to maintain a career position such as what he had. You will definitely find his analysis of the monetary situation very amazing.

Jerry

Originally Posted by ThomPaine

Never heard of it, will look around and see what I come up with..

Cheers,

Thom

EDIT: first match in google, so if this is not it, please let me know, thanks

http://freedom-school.com/affidavit_...dd_1-20-04.pdf

[ThomPaine]

read through the Walker piece once and will probably read it several more times. If what he says is accurate, there is definitely some very revealing information in there.

Thanks

Thom

[freemyggle]

The Affidavit of Walker Todd is posted in the forums. Look for a thread named credit help? by raging bull. I posted it in it's entirety. Learn and enjoy

[framundacheese]

Originally Posted by freemyggle

The Affidavit of Walker Todd is posted in the forums.

I saw this somewhere.

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by framundacheese

I saw this somewhere.

I spoke with Walker on the phone. It is his writing but it was stolen on the way to court so to speak. He never intended for it to be published in any way. He sounded sensible enough not to let it give him ulcers but he is upset and annoyed at the way it has been taken out of context.

The context of the affidavit is only when lawful money is stipulated in the contract - expressly. That is completely lost from the overall context in every instance of publication.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[freemyggle]

That's what I got from reading the Affidavit. As soon as you affix your exemption to the loan, it becomes valueable. That didnt really make sense to me till earlier this morn. I forget which forum, but I thought you (David) were the poster. But I understood it like this,

United States notes = Fiction
Gold and Silver backing = Fact(substance)

FRN's = Fiction
Flesh & blood Man = Fact (substance)

I'm only a babe in all of this, so I'll ask a vet to critique my understanding. Thanks

[Jerry Pitts]

Well David, I am glad to re-read my post above and see that I did not state anything out of context. I simply stated that his analysis is amazing. And it is. As for the issue of how the context by others speaking of the affidavit is concerned, I am forced to agree. He did expressly mention in that case, the term 'lawful money'. As to whether or not others, being obliged under contract and making reference to his affidavit, would be able to claim that their particular contract mentioned 'lawful money' probably will never be known. I also concur that the 'signature' of the man or woman entering into the contract is a pledge, for the energy of the man or woman, in honoring the conditions of the contract.

Jerry

Originally Posted by David Merrill

I spoke with Walker on the phone. It is his writing but it was stolen on the way to court so to speak. He never intended for it to be published in any way. He sounded sensible enough not to let it give him ulcers but he is upset and annoyed at the way it has been taken out of context.

The context of the affidavit is only when lawful money is stipulated in the contract - expressly. That is completely lost from the overall context in every instance of publication.


Regards,

David Merrill.