UCC Discuss topics relating to the UCC, such as negotiable instruments, collection, etc.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > UCC
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #51  
Old 08-05-2007, 02:24 PM
manros manros is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 58
I asked David's opinion

I personally asked his opinion on the subject since I wanted it.

I am the one who did lie to you, since I said I would place you on my ignore list and neglected it.

I thank you any way, you disagree with courtesy and cause people to understand how vital is to get the proper education (to be able to prove themselves right). You are a decent adversary.

Peace
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 08-05-2007, 02:26 PM
manros manros is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 58
I asked David's opinion

I personally asked his opinion on the subject since I wanted it.

I am the one who did lie to you, since I said I would place you on my ignore list and neglected it.

David should keep people like you on his ignore list because you dont want to hear what he has to say. You would love to silence him instead.

I thank you any way, you disagree with courtesy and cause people to understand how vital is to get the proper education (to be able to prove themselves right). You are a decent adversary.

I think I am a con too, whatever that means, I like to be it.

Peace
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 08-05-2007, 05:18 PM
Shoonra Shoonra is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoonra
So it's not a check and it's not a promissory note because it is conditional on an event that will never happen .... yet it also has a 120-day deadline.

Nobody should be surprised when the bank bounces this and the creditors want to see legal tender.


I found six court decisions that this document is (1) worthless and (2) not a payment of/for anything and (3) attempts to pass it might be prosecuted as a criminal act such as theft or fraud.
(1)
Becker v. Dept of Registration (1987) 159 Ill.App.3d 796, 111 Ill.Dec. 759, 513 N.E.2d 5.
(2)
State v. Hernandez (La.App. 1987) 503 So.2d 1181.
(3)
US v. Moser (5th Cir 1997) 123 F3d 813, cert. denied 522 US 1035.
(4)
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. All Ways Inc. (1996) 249 Neb 923, 546 NW2d 807, 29 UCC Rptg Serv.2d 869.
(5)
State v. Taylor (La.App. 1986) 495 So.2d 996, cert. denied 484 US 812.
and (6)
Cohn v. Tucson Electric Power Co. (1983) 138 Ariz 136, 673 P2d 334.

Also one unpublished case from Ohio: Bank One v. Sparks (Ohio App. 3/15/96).

Some people have nothing better to do that make trouble - especially for themselves.

Last edited by Shoonra : 08-08-2007 at 08:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
? on Discharge of Mortgage Redline UCC 185 01-17-2008 07:29 AM
Mortgage forecloseur garbear9727 Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 1 10-29-2004 09:24 AM
mortgage settlement dave b Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 2 08-29-2004 02:53 PM
Mortgage vs. CPN / One Note vs. Another HenryBowman Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 17 06-11-2004 09:37 PM
Mortgage 'trail' hulaimua Misc. Discussion 0 04-04-2004 03:39 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:48 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer