
02-18-2004, 09:47 PM
|
|
|
|
UCC 10-104
I have seen this referred to in financing statements.& However, I cannot find it.& While trying to look it up I found a site that said some stuff about deleted code.& So, does this mean that whatever 10-104 was has now been deleted?
Interesting thing that I learned while looking this up though is that if there is a conflict between deleted code and current code, the deleted code wins.& The site that I was on was referring to UCC.
Thanks,
Montana
|

02-18-2004, 10:02 PM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,511
|
|
|
Re:UCC 10-104
They are always moving things around to be sneaky...
Article 9 was recently revised, it is possible that the section referred to is now located in article 9.
I checked the code and there is a section 9-104, but no section 10-104. It is titled "CONTROL OF DEPOSIT ACCOUNT".
Hope this helps,
Sui Juris
__________________
When a statute, code, or court holding changes tomorrow, does reality change? Does truth change? Does right and wrong change?
If so, there are no absolutes, and the only logical conclusion is that reality, truth, and right and wrong are determined arbitrarily on a daily basis by those with the most power, guns, and money, and the rest of us can choose to run, fight, or be their slaves.
|

02-18-2004, 10:09 PM
|
|
|
|
Re:UCC 10-104
I know, it's very weird.& At first I just thought that it was a typo on mine and I had better fix it. (I didn't write my own, it was done before I studied this stuff).& Then I looked at some examples that I have and they have the same UCC code in it.
At first I thought that it was 1-104 but then I noticed that that was in some of the right beside 10-104.& I'll figure it out eventually,&then I'll post it here.
Montana
|

02-19-2004, 07:18 PM
|
|
|
|
Re:UCC 10-104
<P class=MsoBodyText><FONT face="Times New Roman, Times, serif"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt">UCC § 10-104.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">& </SPAN>Leases Subject to Other Statutes. </SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11.5pt"><SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&</SPAN></SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt"><SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&</SPAN></SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11.5pt">(a) A lease, although subject to this division, is also subject to any applicable: * * * (1) Certificate of title statute of this state . . .<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">& </SPAN>(2) Certificate of title statute of another jurisdiction . . . (3) . . .(b) In case of conflict between * * * this division, other than Section 10-105, subdivision (c) of Section 10-304, and subdivision (c) of Section 10-305, and a law referred to in subdivision (a), * * * that law controls.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt"><?XML:NAMESPACE PREFIX = O /><O:P></O:P></SPAN></FONT>
<P class=MsoNormal style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify"><FONT face="Times New Roman, Times, serif"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; TEXT-TRANSFORM: uppercase; FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman, Times, serif">& <O:P></O:P></SPAN></FONT>
|

02-19-2004, 07:29 PM
|
|
|
|
Re:UCC 10-104
Sampson,
Thanks for your reply.& I did find this early this morning.& My question now is, where the heck is Article 10 now???
Another thing I can't find is Public Law 73-10.
Whoever hides this stuff is evil.
Montana
|

02-21-2004, 10:10 PM
|
|
|
|
Re:UCC 10-104
Delivery order means a written order to deliver goods delivered to a warehouseman, carrier or other person who in the ordinary course of business issues warehouse receipts or bills of lading. 7-102(1)(d)
For laws repealed by Article 7 (Uniform Bills of Lading Act, Uniform Warehouse Receipts Act, Uniform Sales Act) see Sec. 10-102(1) For laws not repealed by Article 7 see Sec. 10-104(1)
|

02-21-2004, 10:59 PM
|
|
|
|
Re:UCC 10-104
Goldphoenix,
Thanks for all of the links.& I will follow up on those right now.
James,
I am not following what you are saying.& I don't know if I missed something somewhere but I am unable to find any UCC that begins with 10.& I will look again now.
Thanks to both of you,
Sara-Jane
|

02-25-2004, 01:06 PM
|
|
|
|
Re:UCC 10-104
Hi all,
I've been wondering how 10-104 fits in to the scheme of things as well.& I am currently using an outside company to discharge some cc debt (did not know CTC even existed when I began this process!), but they use it in the following sentence: "I request you to waive all fees, fines, costs, and charges in accordence with Public Policy under HJR 192 of June 5 1933 and UCC 10-104..."
The only 10-104 I find is titled "Laws not Repealed" and states "[(1)] The Article on Documents of Title (Article 7) does not repeal or modify any laws prescribing the form or contents of documents of title or the services or facilities to be afforded by bailees, or otherwise regulating bailees' businesses in respects not specifically dealt with berein; but the fact that such laws are violated does not affect the status of a document of title which otherwise complies with the definition of a document of title (Section 1-201). As amended in 1962 and 1994." There is also a comment following it.
Also, it is very important to look up the definition of document of title under UCC 1-201(15) to understand what&one can be - it may be rather enlightening!
I still don't fully grasp how it all fits together though. I'm trying to play around with it in my mind that the document of title (birth certificate?) loacted somewhere in the Dept. of Commerce (warehouse/bailee?) is used as some type of financing instrument/statement in the US Bankruptcy, with which I (human self) am not a party to. Am I correct in this guess?
Any help in figuring this out is greatly appreciated.
Sampson: The UCC you speak of must be your State's own adoption/creation and not applicable to residents outside your State.
Cheers.
-Squirrels
|

02-28-2004, 09:50 AM
|
|
|
|
Re:UCC 10-104
UCC 10-104 Laws Not Repealed.
[ (1) ] The Article on Documents of Title (Article 7) does not repeal or modify any laws prescribing the form or contents of documents of title or the services or facilities to be afforded by bailees, or otherwise regulating bailees’ businesses in respects not specifically dealt with herein; but the fact that such laws are violated does not affect the status of a document of title which otherwise complies with the definition of a document of title (Section 1-201).
Official Comment
This section subordinates the Article of this Act on Documents of Title (Article 7) to the more specialized regulations of particular classes of bailees under other legislation and international treaties.
Particularly, the provisions of that Article are superseded by applicable inconsistent provisions regarding the obligation of carriers and the limitation of their liability found in federal legislation dealing with transportation by water (including the Harter Act, act of February 13, 1893, 27 Stat. 445, and the Carriage of Goods by Sea act, Act of April 16, 1936, 49 Stat. 1207); the Warsaw Convention on International Air Transportation, 49 Stat. 3000, and Section 20 (11) of the Interstate Commerce Act, Act of February 20, 1887, 24 Stat. 386, as amended. The Documents of Title provisions of this Act supplement such legislation largely in matters other than obligations of the bailee, e.g., form and effects of negotiation, procedure in the case of lost documents, effect of overissue, possibility of rapid transmission. Cross Reference: Section 7-103.
http://www.union.edu/PUBLIC/ECODEPT/...interstate.htm
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:38 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
|
|