Text of public law 73-10

Does anyone have the text of public law 73-10 or Guarantee Trust of New YOrk vs Henwood ,et al.& ?

kgod,


I just wanted to let you know that I am working on this.& I have class tomorrow and there is a huge law library there.& I will go there and see if I can find it.


I just can't stop wondering who decided to hide all of this stuff.


Later,


Sara-Jane

thanx Montana, i dont have access to a law library.

[ooak]

73-10 is the public law number given to HJR 192...


they are one in the same... hope this helps

good,good, so the text is word for word. i would like gurantee trust info also, i like having it all.

[suijuris]

Here is a copy from the law book:

http://www.suijuris.net/main/suijuri...ile.php?lid=47

[logos]

kgod999:


Though you've probably already found it, I thought others might want a link to this case:


GUARANTY TRUST CO. OF NEW YORK v. HENWOOD, 307 U.S. 247 (1939) http://laws.findlaw.com/us/307/247.html

[Jerseee]

Logos,

You have done an excellent job!!!!

All need to read that case and use it in their battles!!!

This case is definitely going on the top of my list in my archives for future use.

[iamfreeru2]

Hello everyone,


I was looking at Public Law 73-10 of May 12, 1933&just the other day. HJR -192 is at the end of the Act, Title I-Agricultural Adjustment, (H.R. 3835) Public, No. 10. 73rd Congress regarding the economic emergency. HJR 192 actually repealed some of the wording in the original act.


I have been told that HJR 192 was repealed by Public Law 95-147. When I looked up 95-147 I could find no reference regarding HJR-192 and the fact that it has been repealed. If anyone can find any info on the so-called repeal of HJR-192 please let me know.


I have also been told that due to re-instatement of the gold clause in contracts, that HJR-192 is moot. If anyone can shed light on this as well, please do so. It seems to me, however, that in the public we are not allowed to use gold in payment of debts. I do not see, in light of this fact,&how HJR-192 can be moot, as we are forced to use FRNs, which only increase debt and never eliminate it.


Any thoughts are appreciated.


iamfreeru2

[Jerseee]

iamfree,


I could not find anything like that repealing public policy.& I'll keep looking.


And if the gold standard is back, then that means the courts are back as well--and they cannot interfere with private contracts.&


Well they can but not without invitation.