UCC 1-207, Code & Cites

[maddriver]

First please make a note that UCC 1-207 is now UCC 1-308

You said that you explained it to the judge. What did you say to him/her? How did you explain it?



I use ucc 1-207 in all my signatures and even the loan and checks.I dont have any problem with it. When i appear in the court the judge as me the meaning of it and i explain it to the judge.Anytime you use it for court cases you will be ask for details. As long as you can explain it. You can get away with it. One judge cross it out after i explain it to him, and i told him that is the way i sign, and he let it slide before we proceeding with the case on traffic ticket. Luckily the case was dissimissed. One judge ask me if i have a copy of ucc 1-207,handout to give him and the prosecutor,and i said i don't have one with me. I think he was so surprise that i can quotes all that without looking the book or writing it somewhere to read it to the court. If you do your research and memorize all the stuff you will be amaze what you can do as pro se in court system. In fact you will get more respect from the judge and the rest of the court teams that ready to eat you up raw with the law and codes,but your effort of knowlege of the law will prevail.The key factor, you have to be more relax and cum and ready to deal with the situation with the best of your knowlege of studies of the law,but don't aguing with the judge or you will be toast ,even if you are right.

[charlesa6]

Originally Posted by maddriver

First please make a note that UCC 1-207 is now UCC 1-308

You said that you explained it to the judge. What did you say to him/her? How did you explain it?



I use ucc 1-207 in all my signatures and even the loan and checks.I dont have any problem with it. When i appear in the court the judge as me the meaning of it and i explain it to the judge.Anytime you use it for court cases you will be ask for details. As long as you can explain it. You can get away with it. One judge cross it out after i explain it to him, and i told him that is the way i sign, and he let it slide before we proceeding with the case on traffic ticket. Luckily the case was dissimissed. One judge ask me if i have a copy of ucc 1-207,handout to give him and the prosecutor,and i said i don't have one with me. I think he was so surprise that i can quotes all that without looking the book or writing it somewhere to read it to the court. If you do your research and memorize all the stuff you will be amaze what you can do as pro se in court system. In fact you will get more respect from the judge and the rest of the court teams that ready to eat you up raw with the law and codes,but your effort of knowlege of the law will prevail.The key factor, you have to be more relax and cum and ready to deal with the situation with the best of your knowlege of studies of the law,but don't aguing with the judge or you will be toast ,even if you are right.

You are absolutely right. I have the same experience too. I have been saying this all along in my previous posts.
Thanks for reminder the members.

[Charlie Blue]

I was about to post a thread asking a question involving this very same topic (that's why I'm in the UCC section).

Since around the turn of the century, I've been affixing "Without Prejudice UCC 1-207" to all my signatures. Except for one time where I eventually came out on top, I never had any problem when I did that with my signature. What I want to know is this. Would it be just as efficient if I just put "Without Prejudice"?

[quasimodo]

§ 1-308. Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.

(a) A party that with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as "without prejudice," "under protest," or the like are sufficient.

(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to an accord and satisfaction.

[moishanb]

Originally Posted by Charlie Blue

I was about to post a thread asking a question involving this very same topic (that's why I'm in the UCC section).

Since around the turn of the century, I've been affixing "Without Prejudice UCC 1-207" to all my signatures. Except for one time where I eventually came out on top, I never had any problem when I did that with my signature. What I want to know is this. Would it be just as efficient if I just put "Without Prejudice"?

Some 'government' agencies at the state and federal levels are rejecting the applications for things such as licensing, to put the UCC1-308(reserving all rights) with the signature. I suggest the following forms to protect yourself from your commercial account(NAME).

Put By:Name-agent, or Name dba NAME

is the ucc1-207 still in effect? and if not what is the replacement?

[Hydrogenpal]

would the ucc help to close out a charge that is on my brothers record?

He has paid all his fees and has done all his probation for insurance fraud and would like to have his record cleared.
???

[Lawdog]

Originally Posted by Hydrogenpal

would the ucc help to close out a charge that is on my brothers record?

Nope. Absolutely not. The UCC has nothing to do with criminal law matters.

There are plenty of hucksters who will sell you a "kit" that promises to do otherwise, of course. Then, when it fails to have the desired effect, they'll claim you didn't do everything exactly right.

But don't bother asking for your money back. Con artists don't work that way.

[mrg]

Originally Posted by Lawdog

But don't bother asking for your money back.

Con artists don't work that way.

You would know.