UCC Discuss topics relating to the UCC, such as negotiable instruments, collection, etc.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > UCC
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #151  
Old 10-08-2006, 08:33 AM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,323
Yep; cut open the old pillows - they're filled with currency! Therefore a POMC coupled with Trebil**** v. Wilson.

Funny how the dog barks defensively when somebody knocks when as far as I recall nobody on the porch has ever punched me in the face or even been rude. The dog in his pack mentality never bothers to solve the mystery of groceries, butchers and other removals from the violence. Something about routine keeps the bag of dog food in the garage filled. Therefore a break in routine, any break, is a threat to survival; especially without dispelling the abracadabra about currency.

Thanks for your edifying post Jerseee.



Regards,

David Merrill.
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 10-08-2006, 09:57 AM
fulltitle's Avatar
fulltitle fulltitle is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: kingdom of heaven
Posts: 1,577
paper vs specie

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Yep; cut open the old pillows - they're filled with currency! Therefore a POMC coupled with Trebil**** v. Wilson.
Without Prejudice.
Quote:
The "...terms, in specie, are merely descriptive of the kind of dollars in which the note is payable, there being two different kinds in circulation, recognized by law. They mean that the designated number of dollars in the note shall be paid in so many gold or silver dollars of the coinage of the United States. They have acquired this meaning by general usage among traders, merchants, and bankers, and are the opposite of the terms, in currency, which are used when it is desired to make a note payable in paper money. These latter terms, in currency, mean that the designated number of dollars is payable in an equal number of notes which are current in the community as dollars." Trebil**** v. Wilson, 79 U.S. (Wall.) 687, 694-695 (1871)
__________________
All rights reserved. No Liability Assumed. No Value Assured. Without Recourse. Private. Not for hire.

Last edited by fulltitle : 10-08-2006 at 10:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 05-24-2007, 11:05 PM
+Blaze +Blaze is offline
Waking Up
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7
Great Thread -- Anyone know how iamfreeru2's case turned out?

Great Thread -- Anyone know how iamfreeru2's case turned out?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Taking for Value fulltitle UCC 11 07-26-2005 07:40 PM
This Is Getting Annoying! dochand Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 21 11-03-2004 09:53 PM
CPN's? and Redemption for public funds w/ FRNs juststartingout Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 5 06-08-2004 01:09 PM
Use of Negotiable Instruments Daniyl-Yahseph UCC 1 11-08-2003 10:00 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:50 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer