UCC Discuss topics relating to the UCC, such as negotiable instruments, collection, etc.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > UCC
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-18-2005, 05:55 PM
iscovedel's Avatar
iscovedel iscovedel is offline
Waking Up
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 40
clarification...

I found this on the family gaurdian site:

we can use the UCC redemption
process to gift our commercial strawman to a third party. This
insulates us further from any liabilities of the strawman so long as
the person we gifted it to agreed to accept only the benefits and
privileges and none of the liabilities. Because the redemption
process copyrights the strawman and all information about him, then
the government can no longer use the strawman to get at the natural
person. The person we gift our commercial strawman to using this UCC
Redemption then signs a power of attorney to allow us to act on their
behalf. Spouses do this, for instance, for each other in states that
only allow a person to gift their strawman to themselves. California
is like this.

2. We can then file with the IRS a Form 2848 "Power of
Attorney" which gives us power of attorney over our strawman but
leaves the liability of the strawman with the strawman.

Does anypne know if it is possible to be granted power of attorney over only the "strawman" and not the natural person you "gifted" it to?

I don't think I know anyone willing to give me power of attorney, just as I don't know anyone I'd give my power of attorney to...

Has anyone else had luck with this method or by some other means (such as gifting the strawman to themselves, w/o the liabilities and then granting themselves power of attorney over their strawman perhaps?)

Also, anyone with some usefull doc.s (affadavits, IRS forms, etc) please help a brother out...

-isco
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-18-2005, 09:31 PM
theghost theghost is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 228
iscovedel, first of all, you do not have to have the starwman 'gifted" to you i n order to claim a tradename/trademark, or copyright against it. I don't understand your use of the term "gifted" here in regards to the strawman. Second, I believe filing anything with the IRS is unnecessary and wrong. Third, consider this instead;
have a Nevada Corp or LLC (of which you have sole signatory authority for, but are not a member of) file an enormous lien (UCC-1, and/or Mechanics Lien) against the strawman. Now whenever some agency brings a claim against the strawman, they have to get in line. The UCC is very clear on the procedures creditors have to follow, including notice to Superior lien holders, i.e., the Nevada entity. Your name is not attached, and the entity's (Nevada Corp) is rock solid, and has to be paid first. Their claims will evaporate.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Toothpaste KILLS!!! palani Health 20 08-14-2005 02:38 PM
Clarification IBOE/Default on Bond justice4all UCC 3 02-28-2005 06:18 PM
Damaged Party clarification kgod999 Court 0 11-17-2004 12:43 PM
DISPUTING VS VERIFYING THE DEBT - CLARIFICATION cute_chick Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 12 09-29-2004 01:10 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:47 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer