UCC Discuss topics relating to the UCC, such as negotiable instruments, collection, etc.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > UCC
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-11-2005, 07:08 PM
fulltitle's Avatar
fulltitle fulltitle is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: kingdom of heaven
Posts: 1,577
This Sight Draft: Why Its Fraudulent

WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Let us avoid the grey bar hotel. Take a look at this item:

http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/cc/ccsdraft2.jpg

Its so "bogus" its obvious. Its amazingly and dulilshly spooktacular.

#1 The U.S. Treasury doesnt take mail at 15 & Pennsylvania Avenue NE. Its 1500 Pennsylvania NW*, right?
#2 A Department of Debt & Collection doesnt exist at either 15 & Penn Avenue. The US Department of Education probably maybe has a "Department of Debt Collection".

Say there was an account at the Department connected they EIN they sorta-kinda provided. Well too bad they drawer didnt even provide the proper name and address of the government department that would be responsible for processing it!

This poster child instrument is so obviously flawed. But it doesnt make anything grounded in truth errant.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-27-2005, 08:55 PM
bogeyman
 
Posts: n/a
Hmm- is this the same as a document draft?

I had seen this before- SD and read the artical behind it. If memory serves me correctly - this is fraud because it ( the Draft) is drawn on an account that doesn't exist.

Now I do think you can do a Draft on SIGHT. That is a draft ( check) on a good account ( your checking account) for $XXXX.XX .

I am looking at this right now to clear some CC Debt. I will give them the Draft to present to the bank- BUT only if certain critera are met. Namely- Show that the account wasn't funded by my autograph, Certified copy of the instant account inthe all CAPS name. The Soverigns name, what the bank has at risk- and the bookkeeping entries to back it up, Ect.

They have 90 days from the day of receipt to "Cash" it on sight of the bank- provided thay can come up with the goods I asked for. If they don't the game plan is to reject everything else they send as they were tendered payment and refused. I forget what part of the UCC covered it- but it said- The debt is discharged the moment payment is tendered-even if it is rejected,

We shall see.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-27-2005, 10:00 PM
charlesa6's Avatar
charlesa6 charlesa6 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by bogeyman
I had seen this before- SD and read the artical behind it. If memory serves me correctly - this is fraud because it ( the Draft) is drawn on an account that doesn't exist.

Now I do think you can do a Draft on SIGHT. That is a draft ( check) on a good account ( your checking account) for $XXXX.XX .

I am looking at this right now to clear some CC Debt. I will give them the Draft to present to the bank- BUT only if certain critera are met. Namely- Show that the account wasn't funded by my autograph, Certified copy of the instant account inthe all CAPS name. The Soverigns name, what the bank has at risk- and the bookkeeping entries to back it up, Ect.

They have 90 days from the day of receipt to "Cash" it on sight of the bank- provided thay can come up with the goods I asked for. If they don't the game plan is to reject everything else they send as they were tendered payment and refused. I forget what part of the UCC covered it- but it said- The debt is discharged the moment payment is tendered-even if it is rejected,

We shall see.
UCC 3- 603
__________________
Resolution pending
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-28-2005, 10:25 AM
bogeyman
 
Posts: n/a
Charlesa6...

Thanks! I'm reading so much it's tough to remember where I see this stuff. I have "post it's" all over the place. I need an administrative assistant :lol: :lol:
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-28-2005, 10:44 PM
charlesa6's Avatar
charlesa6 charlesa6 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
You are welcome,bogeyman.
__________________
Resolution pending
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-29-2005, 01:39 AM
sagas4
 
Posts: n/a
Sight Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by bogeyman

Now I do think you can do a Draft on SIGHT. That is a draft ( check) on a good account ( your checking account) for $XXXX.XX .
Unless sight drafts have changed meaning because of disuse or have been redefined to mean something else, sight drafts were historically used for exchange between 2 parties by including a trusted third party to handle the exchange. i.e. Say you wanted to buy something from a person or business in San Francisco but you lived in N.Y. You don't want to pay before you can inspect the goods, they don't want to send you the goods till you pay. Neither wants to travel across the country. They send the goods to a trusted well established third party private bank, Western Union, Wells, Fargo, or other institution that can issue drafts on funded accounts or by converting cash and coin to a draft or wire transfer. You come in and inspect (SIGHT), and either accept and authorize a check (DRAFT) to issue from your account, or refuse with cause in which case the goods are returned. This was before credit cards issued by banks, and global information networks etc. Your credit was with the owner of the local general store, not necessarily the bank.

Last edited by sagas4 : 08-29-2005 at 01:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-29-2005, 12:35 PM
bogeyman
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for that information- I figured it's agood idea to post the intent here and see what holes get blown in it..... before proceeding. I will look into that, The other concern I had was this. Could the draft possibly be seen as a fraudulent UCC document creating Debt- when that is reserved for the FED RES banks.

Hmm- well this is why we "talk"

Last edited by bogeyman : 08-29-2005 at 12:36 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-29-2005, 03:24 PM
sagas4
 
Posts: n/a
Sight Draft History

Quote:
Originally Posted by bogeyman
I had seen this before- SD and read the artical behind it. If memory serves me correctly - this is fraud because it ( the Draft) is drawn on an account that doesn't exist.

Now I do think you can do a Draft on SIGHT. That is a draft ( check) on a good account ( your checking account) for $XXXX.XX .

I am looking at this right now to clear some CC Debt. I will give them the Draft to present to the bank- BUT only if certain critera are met. Namely- Show that the account wasn't funded by my autograph, Certified copy of the instant account inthe all CAPS name. The Soverigns name, what the bank has at risk- and the bookkeeping entries to back it up, Ect.

They have 90 days from the day of receipt to "Cash" it on sight of the bank- provided thay can come up with the goods I asked for. If they don't the game plan is to reject everything else they send as they were tendered payment and refused. I forget what part of the UCC covered it- but it said- The debt is discharged the moment payment is tendered-even if it is rejected,
Quote:
Originally Posted by bogeyman
Thanks for that information- I figured it's agood idea to post the intent here and see what holes get blown in it..... before proceeding. I will look into that, The other concern I had was this. Could the draft possibly be seen as a fraudulent UCC document creating Debt- when that is reserved for the FED RES banks.

Hmm- well this is why we "talk"
I believe your comment in bold above to be correct. Check the reference to the montana freemen below.

Not trying to blow holes in anything. There are some here that have a great deal more knowledge than I so I may be full of excrement, but often people are misunderstanding the historical purpose of these instruments and therefore getting into trouble. (My research indicates they were used to facilitate trade across long distances without having travel to walk into the store or warehouse etc., and tender gold/silver or other form of payment or exchange. Countries & Government do this today and some of these things are cleared through the Fed in N.Y. They make a ledger entry and then some guys in the vault actually move bars of gold from one countries "vault space" to the other.)

I have found they (Sight Drafts) are still in use today primarily in the import export business. You can also find some old ones which were used in rail transport in America almost exclusively until the 1930's.

This was a method to secure and preserve ownership of goods until delivery and transfer. There may be a bill of lading or something shipped with the goods that documents ownership which would then be transferred to the buyer upon receipt and acceptance of the goods and in exchange a sight draft would issue. (The bill of exchange is the opposite in that the buyer would issue a BOE before the goods arrived or even after as a BOE can be used as an instrument of credit).

There has been much debate and controversy over what these things (Sight Drafts) are, how to use then, and how to create your own, for instance a few years ago some folks calling themselves the Montana Freemen got into some hot water over these things. They were making their own, claiming to be secured by their property or something, and claiming they could redemmed at the post office. If they had some way of tendering Gold, Silver, or some form of commmonly accepted currency when they were to be cleared and presented back to them for acceptance and payment then there would not have been a problem, however there was no way anyone could collect on these pieces of paper and therefore they were actually creating fradulent instruments of exchange.

A Bill of exchange is similar but it is a promisary note or written order by one person to pay another a specific sum on a specific date sometime in the future. If it is drawn on a bank it is called a bank draft, if it is drawn on another party it is called a trade draft. If it is drawn on a private party then the risk for someone accepting this as payment is dependent upon the creditworthiness of the drawer. If you're going to create your own then one better darned well have a funded account at an institution that can be drawn where the BOE can "clear", otherwise you're just begging for a charge of committing some form of financial fraud.

The ironic thing about this whole system is that governments and banking institutions create worthless paper all day long like the freemen did (Only on a larger scale) and we use it for money . . . FRN's, Euro, Yen, etc. because not one can be presented to the issuer of these instruments for redemption by the bearer for anything of value other than another piece of paper.

Oh, if the draft is drawn on a funded account then why would this be considered fradulent? The Fraud is involved in that many get into trouble by trying to issue their own on accounts that do not exist.

I should change my tag line to "Fractional Reserve Banking, Easier than operating a printing press".

Last edited by sagas4 : 08-29-2005 at 04:14 PM. Reason: Add quotes responding to.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-29-2005, 04:01 PM
sagas4
 
Posts: n/a
Another thing as well. Not to be condescending so please don't take it that way. I fail to see any problem in offering a sight draft on a funded account if you are having a dispute with a CC company, and are offering to pay upon certified proof of obligation. This sounds reasonable if you are having a dispute.



If however, you went and charged up a bunch of stuff on your signature with the CC and are then trying to eliminate that debt claiming an exemption because of the national bankruptcy, that is just plain wrong. Even if "they do it" to us all day long (Monetized Debt or FRN's) and the only thing we have to pay with is worthless paper, 2 wrongs don't make a right. Simply stop using CC's, pay merchants with the worthless paper they want (FRN's), and you'll find your much better off in the long run.



If the CC company has sold or transferred the debt to a third party or collector then there are a myriad of ways to deal with that and there is some good info in the downloads area on VOD.

Last edited by sagas4 : 08-29-2005 at 04:08 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-29-2005, 06:44 PM
bogeyman
 
Posts: n/a
The $ I have- just not in that account. That is the only one they have privy to. The rest is safe outside the banking system. I'm not fighting this on $$ issue- This is on principal. Please don't take this as a flame. I know I get pointed on this. It's not diercted at anyone- just my point of view on the subject. Which admittedly gets me a bit ticked. Sorry if that spills over a bit-

I was going to make it to that account they do know about. Since they can't/won't come up with the items I asked for- in order to make the draft vaild for withdrawl- I don't see the problem there. They can check by phone- but until they present it for withdrawl it isn't "insufficent funds". If they do present it- they still have to have the items I asked for (which will show their fraud by showing the monitizing of the application) in order for the Draft to be valid for redemption. Catch 22 in full reverse. I'll take the chance to have those papers/documents and Affidavit under Oath by a Corporate Officer- WITH the Corporate Seal in my control for publication. I can transfer the $ i to make it good. However- these guys haven't risked anything but accounting entries and don't dare reveal that. I don't think they will present it. Better to let it go that have that come up in a court case. I'm just asking for copies of pertinate paperwork and testimony. Nothing frivoluos.

As far as the validity or conscience in this. IMO do them a disservice by tolerating the criminal course of action they have take in regards to this countries monitary system. I know we won't see eye to eye on this- but I did wrestle with this issue extensively . I had to make sure it was squared with "Thou Shalt Not Steal" before I did anything.

Once I realized that:

1: They commited fraud by monetizing my application, I applied for a revolving loan as they stated- not having my signature/application monetized.
2: Have used my credits for things I never authorized.
3: Failed to fully disclose the terms of the contract- which voids it ab inito
4: Collected interest on my property (signature) that I have seen no compensation for- nor agreed to...theft.
5: Are screwing us at a break neck pace to control us into slavery
6: Collecting on a debt that doesn't exist is extortion. They have risked nothing- so have no consideration for damage.
7:Banks in collusion with Collection agencies doing this is Racketeering
8: and a whole lot more .......

It became clear as to whom had actaully stolen what , and who committed fraud and so that "stealing" issue was laid to rest.

Have you checked out the Banking section in the download area. This isn't about a national debt- this is about whats right and what isn't. The only way they will pay attention is to hit them where it hurts- the pocket book. Besides if it works the way I think- it could be the nightmare they never wanted to see. I have heard this used successfully from two seperate sources. I just wanted to see if anyone here could see a hole.

Ok this is off topic. I'll take it to the approriate thread- sorry for my digression.

Last edited by bogeyman : 08-29-2005 at 06:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bank sent me proof of their FRAUD today!!!!!!!!! HenryBowman Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 111 04-09-2006 08:32 AM
Checks and contracts kjvpatriot1611 Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 26 01-10-2006 11:00 AM
Oh no! The DRAFT is back! suijuris Citizenship & Jurisdiction 54 12-22-2005 09:47 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:08 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer