UCC Discuss topics relating to the UCC, such as negotiable instruments, collection, etc.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > UCC
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 09-28-2005, 01:23 PM
Texasgil Texasgil is offline
Waking Up
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10
Unhappy UCC Filing

I just recieved back from the Secretary of State here in Texas my UCC financing Statement which was rejected, They informed me for : Sec 405.021. FILING OR RECORDING OF FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT. Any sugestions on how to refile these docs :-?


Keep on doing what you have been doing , going to keep on getting what you have been getting
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-28-2005, 01:31 PM
HenryBowman
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texasgil
I just recieved back from the Secretary of State here in Texas my UCC financing Statement which was rejected, They informed me for : Sec 405.021. FILING OR RECORDING OF FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT. Any sugestions on how to refile these docs :-?

Well now, you couldn't have very well filed or recorded a document if they rejected it, could you?

(Not being a smart ass to you, rather to them)

Let me ask you this: Did they refund your payment?

If so, where's the crime?

If not, where's the fraud? (Theft by government)

Just my thoughts.

Henry Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-28-2005, 01:35 PM
HenryBowman
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ice
HB,

You may have got some advice from members here and learned a few things in this forum... but you're DOING IT. And you cannot deny that you have had some really good insight... that little lite bulb above your head has gone on quite a few times during your situation.

I'm proud to know ya. And thanks for sharing.

Ice

Woooooops. I just caught this.

YOU are doing it too. I am proud to know you also.

Let me say this, if anyone thinks it's easy, Let's go ahead and laugh about that now.

All I have has been given to me.


Henry Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-28-2005, 01:46 PM
Texasgil Texasgil is offline
Waking Up
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10
Unhappy UCC Rejection Notice

They did send back the enclosed check which states the fee for this filing to be $30.00. 9-525





Keep on doing what you have been doing , going to keep on getting what you have been getting :o
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-28-2005, 01:53 PM
weishaupt1776's Avatar
weishaupt1776 weishaupt1776 is offline
The Outta Commissiona
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Republic
Posts: 5,417
heard WVA was a lax state. they need the FRNS

I actually take an opposite approach from Remption practices in that I am more comfortable cancelling 14th Amdmt based adhesion contracts rather than accept them

If you are doing Batons method, you can do it at the state for your UCC region which covers you birth state
__________________
THE DOWNLOADS SECTION IS BROKEN & WILL NEVER BE FIXED, SO STOP BUGGING ME !

www.pacinlaw.org ~ www.pacgroups.us
Multi multa, non omnia novit = Many men know many things, no one knows everything.
The De jure Political Group: www.statenationals.net
Do you have concerns about America? www.redamendment.net
Is the government acting in your interest? www.notmygovernment.us
Have you been Deprogrammed? www.deprogram.us


DOWNLOAD THIS COURSE NOW !!

Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-05-2005, 01:43 AM
Selah
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texasgil
I just recieved back from the Secretary of State here in Texas my UCC financing Statement which was rejected, They informed me for : Sec 405.021. FILING OR RECORDING OF FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT. Any sugestions on how to refile these docs :-?

Keep on doing what you have been doing , going to keep on getting what you have been getting


Does your Birth Cirtificate say that "IT" was born in Texas, or another "State?" If not Texas, then file in the region "you" were born. If Texas, then file in a different "State" within the same region.

My best to you!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-10-2005, 09:35 PM
hooded50's Avatar
hooded50 hooded50 is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 95
There's one little thing that the Texas A.G. failed to realize: According to the Supreme Court of the United States of America (by whose decisions even he is bound), filing a lien does not require a judgement from any "Court":

"The ability to place a lien upon a man’s property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times." Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 349 (1968)

You lose AGAIN, Mr. Attorney General.

Last edited by hooded50 : 10-10-2005 at 09:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-10-2005, 11:27 PM
Selah
 
Posts: n/a
Talking One Little "Thing!"

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooded50
There's one little thing ... "The ability to place a lien upon a man’s property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times." Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 349 (1968)

You lose AGAIN, Mr. Attorney General.

Thanks, hooded50, for that valuable bit of tidbit. Of course, they only use the laws that suit them, and disregard the rest. However, there's only one Law, and we can use Him to plead our cause if we're diligent to show ourselves approved. That's not a "catch all, be all cure." As mentioned, diligence is required of each of us.

Thanks again, for the background.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-11-2005, 09:42 AM
weishaupt1776's Avatar
weishaupt1776 weishaupt1776 is offline
The Outta Commissiona
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Republic
Posts: 5,417
Hooded50, awesome catch !!!!

However, I believe Merrils approach as you being the court of competent jurisdiction is the authorization necessary to issue a judgement lien.

Just sign it as an order as "the court"

Where's the Delegation of Authority to issue orders

Am i prohibited from issuing a judgement?

How?

Where?

Who authorizes?
__________________
THE DOWNLOADS SECTION IS BROKEN & WILL NEVER BE FIXED, SO STOP BUGGING ME !

www.pacinlaw.org ~ www.pacgroups.us
Multi multa, non omnia novit = Many men know many things, no one knows everything.
The De jure Political Group: www.statenationals.net
Do you have concerns about America? www.redamendment.net
Is the government acting in your interest? www.notmygovernment.us
Have you been Deprogrammed? www.deprogram.us


DOWNLOAD THIS COURSE NOW !!

Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-11-2005, 10:56 PM
Mr Nuetron
 
Posts: n/a
Mandamis?

Can you do one of thos Mandamas things to the A.G.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brown vs. Texas weishaupt1776 Court 6 09-23-2005 05:08 PM
Motion for summary in State of Texas fastej34 Court 15 07-12-2005 07:40 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:18 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer