Look what new "law" Texas had to pass!

Looks like some people are really sticking it to them, the Public Servants, that is. If the Public Servants aren't accountable to the Public, then they're nothing more than agents of the Tyrants in charge. Everyone has a right of some form of redress including an Affidavit of Truth, especially from the Public Servants. See the alert put out by the Attorney General of Texas Greg Abbott, and how he quotes the new state law SB 1589:

"...a county clerk may delay recording a suspicious lien pending review by the county or district attorney. The clerk may also request additional documentation in support of the lien, such as a contract or other document bearing the alleged debtor’s signature. Similarly, the Secretary of State’s Office may request additional documentation on UCC financing statements submitted for recording, and may ask the Attorney General’s Office for assistance in determining their validity. The law took effect September 1, 2005."

Also, look how he associates words like "fraudulent debt claims", "A bogus claim," and "bogus liens" with his following statement, "The first sign of financial harassment is often an affidavit, letter or notice that purports to create a debt if you do not take some specific action."

Make sure your ducks are all in a row! They sure don't like answering a few simple questions.

[Jerseee]

Selah,

This is fine. because all of our docs here are based on common law and righteousness. I think this is for that stuff that Winston Shrout and all the other folks in this state are doing.

But documents based on common law and backed by case law will not be denied because, we will hold them accountable to their own code and the law.

Good heads up

Originally Posted by Selah

Looks like some people are really sticking it to them, the Public Servants, that is. If the Public Servants aren't accountable to the Public, then they're nothing more than agents of the Tyrants in charge. Everyone has a right of some form of redress including an Affidavit of Truth, especially from the Public Servants. See the alert put out by the Attorney General of Texas Greg Abbott, and how he quotes the new state law SB 1589:

"...a county clerk may delay recording a suspicious lien pending review by the county or district attorney. The clerk may also request additional documentation in support of the lien, such as a contract or other document bearing the alleged debtor’s signature. Similarly, the Secretary of State’s Office may request additional documentation on UCC financing statements submitted for recording, and may ask the Attorney General’s Office for assistance in determining their validity. The law took effect September 1, 2005."

Also, look how he associates words like "fraudulent debt claims", "A bogus claim," and "bogus liens" with his following statement, "The first sign of financial harassment is often an affidavit, letter or notice that purports to create a debt if you do not take some specific action."

Make sure your ducks are all in a row! They sure don't like answering a few simple questions.

[Ice]

Originally Posted by Selah

Looks like some people are really sticking it to them, the Public Servants, that is. If the Public Servants aren't accountable to the Public, then they're nothing more than agents of the Tyrants in charge. Everyone has a right of some form of redress including an Affidavit of Truth, especially from the Public Servants. See the alert put out by the Attorney General of Texas Greg Abbott, and how he quotes the new state law SB 1589:

"...a county clerk may delay recording a suspicious lien pending review by the county or district attorney. The clerk may also request additional documentation in support of the lien, such as a contract or other document bearing the alleged debtor’s signature. Similarly, the Secretary of State’s Office may request additional documentation on UCC financing statements submitted for recording, and may ask the Attorney General’s Office for assistance in determining their validity. The law took effect September 1, 2005."

Also, look how he associates words like "fraudulent debt claims", "A bogus claim," and "bogus liens" with his following statement, "The first sign of financial harassment is often an affidavit, letter or notice that purports to create a debt if you do not take some specific action."

Make sure your ducks are all in a row! They sure don't like answering a few simple questions.

Use those laws against anyone that would come after you... such as this: "The clerk may also request additional documentation in support of the lien, such as a contract or other document bearing the alleged debtor’s signature." Quote this law in any case that a "collector" brings against you and have them produce the contract. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. What you need to do is disect the law... read it with a critical eye.

And one thing for sure... make sure this guy isn't in public office after the next election.

Ice

Ice,

I was thinking the same thing. Glad to get a 2nd on that. Thanks!

[weishaupt1776]

Originally Posted by Selah

document bearing the alleged debtor’s signature.

That's a tough one to get over. Looks like we may have to file our OWN orders under rule 64 at the USDC as courts of competent jurisdiction ala David Merrill

They are running scared.

Just today, a "chief deputy clerk" gave me all kinds of unsolicited legal advice, about how he wasn't going to do this, or that, and at the end,

BECAUSE I HAD WITNESSES,

I walked out with the highest level of self authenticating document that will drive a nail in a coffin. (not mine).

If I can stress one thing, and I LEARNED IT HERE, TAKE AT LEAST 2 WITNESSES ANYTIME YOU STEP FOOT INTO A WHOR--- EXCUSE ME, COURT HOUSE.

If you must attend a "hearing" or "trial", take your own court reporter. No matter what the cost.


Henry Franklin

P.S. Thank you again to all who make this site possible. My payment of my debt is to give back, and I am doing that in my own way.

Keep punchin hank!FIGHT THE POWER.The maggots (courts) need the host(public) but they are the dead men walking(sytem).

[charlesa6]

Originally Posted by HenryBowman

They are running scared.

Just today, a "chief deputy clerk" gave me all kinds of unsolicited legal advice, about how he wasn't going to do this, or that, and at the end,

BECAUSE I HAD WITNESSES,

I walked out with the highest level of self authenticating document that will drive a nail in a coffin. (not mine).

If I can stress one thing, and I LEARNED IT HERE, TAKE AT LEAST 2 WITNESSES ANYTIME YOU STEP FOOT INTO A WHOR--- EXCUSE ME, COURT HOUSE.

If you must attend a "hearing" or "trial", take your own court reporter. No matter what the cost.


Henry Franklin

P.S. Thank you again to all who make this site possible. My payment of my debt is to give back, and I am doing that in my own way.

I agree, that's the way to do it. Put them on notice on candid court reporter doc. Hehehehe.

[Ice]

HB,

You may have got some advice from members here and learned a few things in this forum... but you're DOING IT. And you cannot deny that you have had some really good insight... that little lite bulb above your head has gone on quite a few times during your situation.

I'm proud to know ya. And thanks for sharing.

Ice

[dadmoonbunny]

Originally Posted by Ice

Use those laws against anyone that would come after you... such as this: "The clerk may also request additional documentation in support of the lien, such as a contract or other document bearing the alleged debtor’s signature." Quote this law in any case that a "collector" brings against you and have them produce the contract. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. What you need to do is disect the law... read it with a critical eye.

And one thing for sure... make sure this guy isn't in public office after the next election.

Ice

Was to challenge the "leins" that the Infernal Revenue Suckers try to put on folks. Without a signature, from EITHER party, if the clerk files that thing, BY THE NEW LAW, You have got them over a barrel.

Thoughts????