Something clicked for me this morning at about 2:30 when I was explaining to someone the difference between work and employment. Going over the nature of work as simple hire, and employment as a form of usury due to the acceptance of benefits (such as 401k, medical, dental, etc, thus getting more out of the exchange than one was putting into it), I later considered why accepting an agreement of commerce with a corporation puts one in the realm of the U.S. government 14th Amendment? "person"age. Someone wouldn't be accepting privileges from the federal government, they would be contracting with a corporation... wouldn't they?
Then it hit me. I thought back to the
U.S. replaced by a corporation thread. If my understanding that a) the federal government has created a corporation to manage its affairs, and that b) the de facto STATEs created by the federal government as federal zones outside of Washington D.C. are also corporations, was correct then entities incorporating with D.C. or any of the corporate STATES become, in law, subsidiary corporations of the corporate U.S. of Washington D.C.. One big corporation having within it subsidiary corporations... all of the corporations in the U.S., from Starbucks to Walmart.
This would mean that they're all, being owned by the federal government, guilty of being out of their 10x10 square mile yard of Washington D.C.. If they want to be federal, let them all go back to D.C., and leave the
de jure states to us. God knows they don't hire sovereign citizens generally speaking, they merely offer employment to other lawless "14th Amendment" citizens. Those with an inclination to practice commercial liencraft professionally, take notice of the apparent opportunity, with every single corporation in the U.S., from Halliburton to that church down the street thats incorporated as a non-profit, being apparently valid and viable targets for liencraft due to being federal corporations incorporated within, and acting without, the District of Columbia.
The idea gets bigger, fast. When I tried to grasp the concept of every corporation in the U.S. being a subsidiary of the federal government, I was reminded of some reading I had done years ago on marriage licenses. It had said that with the State as third party to one's (two's?) marriage, everyone with a marriage license was also married to the State. What I was seeing with corporations, by incorporating
within the federal government and its district STATEs, incorporating as subsidiaries of the federal government, seemed to be another application of the concept.
Then, having an interest in liencraft, I considered the various instances of corporations with a view to practical applications of this concept. This was when an visual of the Birth Certificate occurred to me. Not only are corporations corporate, so is every U.S. citizen (at least, by their own claim). We have cases of U.S. citizens wandering around within the several States, conducting commerce, effecting corporations which often refuse to hire sovereigns, displacing our lawful society with a disruptive culture which, if anything, belongs in D.C.. Corporations, corporate State governments and local municipalities, and U.S. citizens with strawmen living in the several States would all seem to be valid targets for a commercial lien. Put simply, everyone and everything that is not de jure and sovereign, as everything that isn't is affiliated with and, probably due to federal greed, apparently owned by D.C.. The old adage about them all being in bed together seems to apply, and in this case to our advantage. Enough commercial liens, in addition to being of inordinate financial assistance to us, would also gum up the works, making commerce engaged in by an entity designed to regulate that very interstate commerce and now obliterating those states with it, utterly impossible. Naturally, I'm
celebrating.
- Satori
