Copyright strawman?

[Rlynne]

I was reading various documents in the Download Section and saw one entitled Copyright Strawman.

It didn't clarify the purpose of copyrighting the strawman nor did it list where one should have it filed. Can anyone shed some light on this?

[weishaupt1776]

Originally Posted by Rlynne

Can anyone shed some light on this?

Yup, turn the switch off and go to another room. This is not a necessary procedure and a waste of time

[David Merrill]

Agreed.


http://friends-n-family-research.inf...tification.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ification2.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ification3.jpg


The above enrty into commerce was effective under my parents' unwitting signature until I was 18. After that it has only been effective when I utilize it.

If anyone else uses it they would likely be construed guilty of Identity Theft even though it is not my birth certificate and I would not be forming a complaint. It would still be criminal impersonation.

So filing a copyright on it is redundant and basically junk legislation.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[RevokeTheTrust]

Greetings and blessings holders of Rlynne,
weishaupt1776, and David Merrill.

Would it be tresspass to say that a Birth Certificate is prefatory to a corporation, to incorporate someone else's feet to cary its own? That foreign legislature has already expressed a copyright on its birth certificate. They want a foreigner to make a claim to it, and thereby the foreign world will incorporate all matter that makes a claim on theirs. That's what I think is bothersome, given 99% of births are head-first, yet the Dead give-away is recorded as feet-first. Thereto, if anyone actually walked on the State, then their mind would be waiting for them at the King's bench.

UCC Redemption was intended to claim the strawman, yet there needs to be emhasis on what is being called a strawman by the Uniform Commercial Code. There is the pirated goods being recognized as counterfeit, and then there is the purpresture in all UPPER-CASE-LETTERS. Divided, one would refer to the long-handed-written pirate as the transmitting utility, and the other as a ...receiving utility? Nothing in the UCC discloses a "receiving utility", unless there is another word known as "trust" that suffice. In accordance with the principles of the UCC, as would a UCC Redemptorist wanting to make absolute claim to the counterfeit in the Birth Certificate, it would not prevail perhaps because to make a claim on somthing you already own would be admission of vacating one's administrative capacity.

Surely, any creature that tries intently to displace the true John Quincy ^ Doe would be protested by mindful Arms and Feet that were stepped-upon by a foreign adminstraitor calling themselves holder in due course of a ship boren "JOHN QUINCY DOE" with an antennae at the maste for station "John Quincy Doe." Of'course, that's would civilized societies due to subdue their neighbors -- have at them, to intend add-option of a foreign persona as one's own. I believe the word to use to the transmitting utility and the perpresture would be that of a "cuckold" by the foreign legislature. Whose temple wouldn't be fiery, if they thought it as this? Is that not why the UCC Redemptorists do all they can to subdue and bind down the transmitting utility and perpresture, so as to prevent those foreigners from indefinitely scapegoating their satanic child-process into the mal-administration of a neighbor they hate, or that is the only way for the State to negotiate with the people -- by taking their birth-right with a mask (14th-century France definition, a person is a "mask worn from time to time").

If anyone has difficulty exhibiting evidence of their true name, then perhaps the best way is to join a Club and go Seal clubbing...so as to exhibit a conflict of interests

http://collectors.org/CD/Club_Index.asp?sort=name

Most of us would be weary to be a member of the Ships In Bottles Association of America, Triple Ridge Insulator Club, Society of Self-Playing Musical Instruments, New England Decoy Collectors Association, Morse Telegraph Club, American Credit Card Collectors Society, and American Driving Society all at the same time? Of'course the legislature is going to Craft it's own and claim Council over its creations, not to be confused with American Craft Council.

Happy they can't touch hyphens, to convert them into their form syncopate/idem sonans First Name and Last Name.

with love,
Gregory-Thomas

[weishaupt1776]

Yeah, that's sounds cool. It's Much easier just to stamp the BC Cancelled for Legal Cause Ab Inito rather than get into all of the UCC matrix. Original Jurisdicition pre-1868, Common Law & Equity Maxims are not dead no matter how many of Jack Smith's Monday Night Tapes One listens to

[charlesa6]

Originally Posted by RevokeTheTrust

Greetings and blessings holders of Rlynne,
weishaupt1776, and David Merrill.

Would it be tresspass to say that a Birth Certificate is prefatory to a corporation, to incorporate someone else's feet to cary its own? That foreign legislature has already expressed a copyright on its birth certificate. They want a foreigner to make a claim to it, and thereby the foreign world will incorporate all matter that makes a claim on theirs. That's what I think is bothersome, given 99% of births are head-first, yet the Dead give-away is recorded as feet-first. Thereto, if anyone actually walked on the State, then their mind would be waiting for them at the King's bench.

UCC Redemption was intended to claim the strawman, yet there needs to be emhasis on what is being called a strawman by the Uniform Commercial Code. There is the pirated goods being recognized as counterfeit, and then there is the purpresture in all UPPER-CASE-LETTERS. Divided, one would refer to the long-handed-written pirate as the transmitting utility, and the other as a ...receiving utility? Nothing in the UCC discloses a "receiving utility", unless there is another word known as "trust" that suffice. In accordance with the principles of the UCC, as would a UCC Redemptorist wanting to make absolute claim to the counterfeit in the Birth Certificate, it would not prevail perhaps because to make a claim on somthing you already own would be admission of vacating one's administrative capacity.

Surely, any creature that tries intently to displace the true John Quincy ^ Doe would be protested by mindful Arms and Feet that were stepped-upon by a foreign adminstraitor calling themselves holder in due course of a ship boren "JOHN QUINCY DOE" with an antennae at the maste for station "John Quincy Doe." Of'course, that's would civilized societies due to subdue their neighbors -- have at them, to intend add-option of a foreign persona as one's own. I believe the word to use to the transmitting utility and the perpresture would be that of a "cuckold" by the foreign legislature. Whose temple wouldn't be fiery, if they thought it as this? Is that not why the UCC Redemptorists do all they can to subdue and bind down the transmitting utility and perpresture, so as to prevent those foreigners from indefinitely scapegoating their satanic child-process into the mal-administration of a neighbor they hate, or that is the only way for the State to negotiate with the people -- by taking their birth-right with a mask (14th-century France definition, a person is a "mask worn from time to time").

If anyone has difficulty exhibiting evidence of their true name, then perhaps the best way is to join a Club and go Seal clubbing...so as to exhibit a conflict of interests

http://collectors.org/CD/Club_Index.asp?sort=name

Most of us would be weary to be a member of the Ships In Bottles Association of America, Triple Ridge Insulator Club, Society of Self-Playing Musical Instruments, New England Decoy Collectors Association, Morse Telegraph Club, American Credit Card Collectors Society, and American Driving Society all at the same time? Of'course the legislature is going to Craft it's own and claim Council over its creations, not to be confused with American Craft Council.

Happy they can't touch hyphens, to convert them into their form syncopate/idem sonans First Name and Last Name.

with love,
Gregory-Thomas

Thanks for chime in. I agree with your emphasis relatively to UCC and Copyright the strawman. Yes, it work, and put bureaucrat, and other institutions including attorney etc.,in check.
One attorney, have to tell the judge, we are in the middle of the case, and I'm sending them my copyright notice, and the blackrobe smile, because I already bind one with my case, so the judge no about it too. If somebody says, is not working, you not doing it right.
Copyright strawman is leathal weapon, that the debt collection can't mess with it not even the bank, BB, etc.
UCC, Copyright strawman etc., is your protection, you, family, and your property.
Again, do your research, study, sampling what you want to send out, and see respond, and all that before you make it official. You have to master the possibilities, means you have to study all material and ready and willing to defend it at all cost.
Anything at all, you put in the Public Record is an official, and all this institutions check it out before they send anything to your mailing address, except the current ones you doing the business with and if the current want to offer you any new business, they will find out, you copyright your strawman name, and they will address you accordingly.
Jerseeeee,and Iamfreeeu2 can chime in and give a little education about DBA, and UCC if they want to.
DBA for Jerseeeeee, and UCC for Iamfreeru2.
Thanks gentlemen.

[David Merrill]

Thank you Gregory Thomas (pardon me for losing the hyphen) and Weishaupt. Especially when I can follow it, your prose is always welcome. You gave me a terrific new word, that is almost out of existence - perpesture. I found it used by the US Supreme Court www.walrus.com/~jklotz/greensup.htm - 32k

Originally Posted by RevokeTheTrust

Greetings and blessings holders of Rlynne,
weishaupt1776, and David Merrill.

Would it be tresspass to say that a Birth Certificate is prefatory to a corporation, to incorporate someone else's feet to cary its own? That foreign legislature has already expressed a copyright on its birth certificate. They want a foreigner to make a claim to it, and thereby the foreign world will incorporate all matter that makes a claim on theirs. That's what I think is bothersome, given 99% of births are head-first, yet the Dead give-away is recorded as feet-first. Thereto, if anyone actually walked on the State, then their mind would be waiting for them at the King's bench.

Delightful imagery for the otherwise boring (now boring term) novation. Intercession of the newborn's little feet to a paper terrain by stamping the little one's feet to a bill of lading called birth certificate made by a major bank note company. I love it!

UCC Redemption was intended to claim the strawman, yet there needs to be emhasis on what is being called a strawman by the Uniform Commercial Code. There is the pirated goods being recognized as counterfeit, and then there is the purpresture in all UPPER-CASE-LETTERS. Divided, one would refer to the long-handed-written pirate as the transmitting utility, and the other as a ...receiving utility? Nothing in the UCC discloses a "receiving utility", unless there is another word known as "trust" that suffice. In accordance with the principles of the UCC, as would a UCC Redemptorist wanting to make absolute claim to the counterfeit in the Birth Certificate, it would not prevail perhaps because to make a claim on somthing you already own would be admission of vacating one's administrative capacity.

That is why I blended the Strawman Redemption concept into transciever utility. Otherwise the equations were not true equations.

http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/page1.jpg
http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/page2.jpg

I am please to hear your articulation of the transmission in terms of RLC theory - reference to antennas and such.

Surely, any creature that tries intently to displace the true John Quincy ^ Doe would be protested by mindful Arms and Feet that were stepped-upon by a foreign adminstraitor calling themselves holder in due course of a ship boren "JOHN QUINCY DOE" with an antennae at the maste for station "John Quincy Doe." Of'course, that's would civilized societies due to subdue their neighbors -- have at them, to intend add-option of a foreign persona as one's own. I believe the word to use to the transmitting utility and the perpresture would be that of a "cuckold" by the foreign legislature. Whose temple wouldn't be fiery, if they thought it as this? Is that not why the UCC Redemptorists do all they can to subdue and bind down the transmitting utility and perpresture, so as to prevent those foreigners from indefinitely scapegoating their satanic child-process into the mal-administration of a neighbor they hate, or that is the only way for the State to negotiate with the people -- by taking their birth-right with a mask (14th-century France definition, a person is a "mask worn from time to time").

"...stepped-upon" being jammed, I agree. Mental conditioning keeps one from realizing the true nature of things. I knew a technician who worked with headphones, listening to the radio. Whenever I needed him I just plugged a resistor for an antenna into the output of a signal generator on his radio's carrier frequency. The silence was his pager.

If anyone has difficulty exhibiting evidence of their true name, then perhaps the best way is to join a Club and go Seal clubbing...so as to exhibit a conflict of interests

http://collectors.org/CD/Club_Index.asp?sort=name

I may have to read that link to get it.

Most of us would be weary to be a member of the Ships In Bottles Association of America, Triple Ridge Insulator Club, Society of Self-Playing Musical Instruments, New England Decoy Collectors Association, Morse Telegraph Club, American Credit Card Collectors Society, and American Driving Society all at the same time? Of'course the legislature is going to Craft it's own and claim Council over its creations, not to be confused with American Craft Council.

That's what I love about you George Thomas; that is informative poetry. Something about an American Driving Society brings to mind a new thread about four or five citations saying driver licenses are outside the scope of law in Texas? I think I am going to run with that one if you don't mind terribly - American Driving Society.

Happy they can't touch hyphens, to convert them into their form syncopate/idem sonans First Name and Last Name.

Of course! Syncopation. Disrupt the resonance. Truly worth thinking over. I may reconsider changing Gregory-Thomas back to what your parents named you - Gregory Thomas.

with love,
Gregory-Thomas

[Rlynne]

I see the benefits of copyrights for businesses (giving the owner control over their works financially and legally), just trying to wrapped my head around the concept in regards to an all caps name.

The idea behind it seems like it would work the same way, I said seems like. I don't know of anyone who has done this much less benefitted from such action, do you?

Doing it as a DBA? Hmmm


On another thread I found something about a common law styled copyright mentioned but the author didn't go on to explain.
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/37297-post18.html

[Rlynne]

What say you on the comment below in regards to copyrighting and using a DBA for your "strawman"?

Originally Posted by charlesa6

Jerseeeee,and Iamfreeeu2 can chime in and give a little education about DBA, and UCC if they want to.
DBA for Jerseeeeee, and UCC for Iamfreeru2

[iamfreeru2]

Originally Posted by Rlynne

What say you on the comment below in regards to copyrighting and using a DBA for your "strawman"?

I must agree with those that say the copyrighting of the strawman should be left alone. I have learned much in the past couple of years and this is one thing I have learned. I copyrighted my STRAWMAN in the past and no longer recommend it. I do say, however, you have propietary use of STRAWMAN and there is no need to copyright it. As far as the DBA is concerned I will let Jerseee answer that one.

We are also finding that the flesh and blood cannot be the "secured party" on the UCC-1 filing. The flesh and blood cannot enter the commercial registry contrary to popular opinion. I will address that more later when I am feeling better. Not doing well right now so I must exit.