cannot register all-caps trademark name

[KITCHIE]

David I disagree.

When I filled out my ap for a DL my name did NOT appear as I wrote it. I wrote Katherine-Elizabeth: Snedigar. It came back SNEDIGAR, KATHERINE ELIZABETH. They turned me into a Person and put me into a contract with the state to transport passengers or freight for hire. I don't transport anything or any one for hire. The STATE OF NEVADA stole my identity for the purpose of charging me a business tax.

My auto is not registered because I do not par-take in the business of using the highways for hire. If they want me to have a plate for the purpose of safety (what a laugh) or to help track my auto if it is stolen,(yea right) I have no problem with that. A ONE TIME ONLY small charge for the plate is all that is necessary.

Now if I am going to paint my house, do I need to get a business license to do that? Or say I want to add a room onto my house, I am not a contractor, do I need to get a contractors license to do that?

Corporations operate with fictions. States create Persons i.e., corporations for the purpose of revenue. The phone company, etc. does business with corporations.

When I signed the ap for my DL I signed it By Katherine....
the clerk took it and started to walk away and suddenly came back to me and said "Do you always sign your name By?" I said yes I do.

Oh and I will be able to file the fictious name of BOB LARKIN. I know this because my mentor has a company filed with the secretary of state called
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. Go do a search in Nevada's business and industry and you can see for yourself. Many people who are questioning who is the IRS use this information.

Kitchie

[David Merrill]

David I disagree.

Nope; you agree.

My DL is in my STRAWMAN'S name

P.S. With no reply overnight I will add a comment.

You walked into the Driver License Shop and tried to do domestic trade tendering emergency foreign currency (FRNs)? No, your admission is you knew full well, in good faith, you were requesting Re-Venue as a stranger and foreigner - nakar/nokriy (Biblical Hebrew) - see attachment for a proper description of the Driver License Shop in the corporate State of Colorado. You walked in knowing you were declaring yourself to be a resident - Res - property - - Ident - properly identified as such.

So you are either executing an extraordinary rendition or you are as non-compos mentis as they made you out to be. Especially if you are pulling that card out of your purse knowing better than to use it to identify yourself. Like The Ghost said about the matter: http://www.suijuris.net/forum/court/...ur-name-6.html Post 52.

On another occasion, I was called to testify against my own mother. I rejected the name they were calling as being my own. The "judge" snarled louder and louder that "I" (pointing his finger at me) had better approach his bench, or his bailiff would take me down. I agreed under the obvious verbal threat of bodily harm he had just made. He then demanded that I show him my drivers license (which at the time, I had) to which I tossed to him to examine (bailiff now right behind me just looking for a reason, literally breathing down my neck) the "judge" read the name on the license aloud, and said "you're so and so", while glancing at the license, I said "no I'm not", this went on three times, after the third "no I'm not", he (the "judge") threw the license back at me (literally) and told "me" to sit down, which I was going to do anyway. Guess what...I didn't testify.....in the face of a "Citation to Discover Assets" with my stawman's name on it! My mother won her case, and we never heard another word about it. Whenevr you see these 'judges" in action, just close your eyes for a second, and picture the little insignificant man behind the curtain, posing as the Wizard of Oz, from that great movie, and suddenly things seem to come into perspective.

I carry a Certificate of Search from the federal court for my ID. It says there are no civil or criminal cases filed against me; ergo no judgments. Simple. And it says "David Merrill" too. But I will get a document from my clerk this morning that I used to carry years ago while driving. It simply exempts me from the commercial venue - however the power in it is that it is the Department of Revenue - DMV testifying such.

Meanwhile: http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ification5.jpg

Conselor Merrill,

As I am new to this forum, I would like to make the following comment to you.....

I have been reading many of the posts that you make, and am impressed by the depth of your knowledge on related subject matter.

However, as I have previously stated in an earlier post, I do not question your knowledge of law, just you motives for your answers, ie., which side of the 'coin' you really represent.

Alas, I (the public) may never know except for yourself and God, Yeshua HaMashiach Himself.

Having said this, I still think it best for the average person to pursue copyrighting/trademarking of their STRAWMAN, if for no other reason than to force them to get acquainted with the law and principles of it which they are dealing (fighting?) against.

Mr. Joe Average could never comprehend the principles and subtleties of law, much less put into practice the theory that you espouse.

To continually discourage these novice practioners is, I believe doing them a disservice and will prove to be a discouragement for them to pursue useful avenues of redress for their plight.

I have only been at this for a couple of years myself and do not contend that I have more knowlege of the finer points of sovereignty and law that you have; nonetheless, I will at least remember what you have said in related instances, and when my knowlege has caught up enuf to where I can see it as truth, and helpful, then I can apply those principles.

It is apparent that and has always been, that no one individual can be proficient in all areas of sovereignty law, IRS code, understanding the 'vapor money' theory of the Federal Reserve bank, STRAWMAN, etc. Nevertheless, we keep enhancing our knowlege base to improve our quality of life and slowly expose the wizard behind the curtain.....

By the way, someone (perhaps I read it here) suggested to get a copy on e-bay of the "Cracking the Code" book.

I have been getting most of my info on freedom, liberty and sovereignty sites, 7th fire, etc., but am interested on your opinion of this dated script (which I have been told has an excellent parable on the "Wizard of Oz"© movie.

Regards,

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by legalII

Conselor Merrill,

As I am new to this forum, I would like to make the following comment to you.....

I have been reading many of the posts that you make, and am impressed by the depth of your knowledge on related subject matter.

However, as I have previously stated in an earlier post, I do not question your knowledge of law, just you motives for your answers, ie., which side of the 'coin' you really represent.

Alas, I (the public) may never know except for yourself and God, Yeshua HaMashiach Himself.

Having said this, I still think it best for the average person to pursue copyrighting/trademarking of their STRAWMAN, if for no other reason than to force them to get acquainted with the law and principles of it which they are dealing (fighting?) against.

Mr. Joe Average could never comprehend the principles and subtleties of law, much less put into practice the theory that you espouse.

To continually discourage these novice practioners is, I believe doing them a disservice and will prove to be a discouragement for them to pursue useful avenues of redress for their plight.

I have only been at this for a couple of years myself and do not contend that I have more knowlege of the finer points of sovereignty and law that you have; nonetheless, I will at least remember what you have said in related instances, and when my knowlege has caught up enuf to where I can see it as truth, and helpful, then I can apply those principles.

It is apparent that and has always been, that no one individual can be proficient in all areas of sovereignty law, IRS code, understanding the 'vapor money' theory of the Federal Reserve bank, STRAWMAN, etc. Nevertheless, we keep enhancing our knowlege base to improve our quality of life and slowly expose the wizard behind the curtain.....

By the way, someone (perhaps I read it here) suggested to get a copy on e-bay of the "Cracking the Code" book.

I have been getting most of my info on freedom, liberty and sovereignty sites, 7th fire, etc., but am interested on your opinion of this dated script (which I have been told has an excellent parable on the "Wizard of Oz"© movie.

Regards,

I think the concept of re-registering the Strawman is silly. Those who espouse the theories do not make a distinction between the true name and full or legal name. Above, the woman thinks that a semi-colon divides the property but she did inadaquate forum shopping before she walked into the Dept. of Revenue for the privilege (private legis (law)) of "driving".

Albeit the Jewish sense of monotheism dictates that the verb Yeshua (to save) must only come from the God of Abraham, the name of the man was Yehoshuah - with a distinct pronunciation on the "ho" and minor accent on the "yu" sound.

http://www.direct.ca/trinity/yehoshua.html

You express faith that he is equivalently God so I suggest you not rob the theophoric nature of his name Yehoshuah. That was his name anyway, whether you attribute him any supernatural powers of Resurrection or not, even if his mother Mary called him to dinner "Yeshua!" - like calling me Dave instead of David.

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ll_Lazarus.zip
Chapter from The Nazarene Gospel Restored

In the heart of what I am saying we find the advanced-resonance, also at the heart of all religious magic, of spelling the name correctly. After all misnomer is a fatal error in any court.

I have been helpful here by sharing a suitor's experience in getting information from the Secretary of State - getting her to do her job. However there is no sense in re-registering the name in upper case. If you are saying people should do it to mistrain themselves about law, then I disagree.

http://car2.elpasoco.com/RcdQueryName.asp
http://car2.elpasoco.com/ListOfInstruments.asp

Trade Name Affidavit

My advice to her would be to renew her license (which actually belongs to the State by the way) signing "Katherine Elizabeth dba SNEDIGAR, KATHERINE ELIZABETH". Also she needs to lose the hyphen. Her parents did not name her Katherine-Elizabeth. She can show a certified copy of the Trade Name Affidavit to the police officer. Around this particular daughter corporation, the Dept. of Revenue quickly traded out the digital pads to smaller size so that if you try fitting all that in, it is illegible. But if she is around this State corporation, a player within it (person) then she can simply explain it to the police officer before she hands over a card. Then she can simply Refuse for Cause any presentments, being the woman Katherine Elizabeth.


Regards,

David Merrill.


P.S.

But I will get a document from my clerk this morning that I used to carry years ago while driving. It simply exempts me from the commercial venue - however the power in it is that it is the Department of Revenue - DMV testifying such.

I tried but it is misindexed so I will have to remember (c. 1995) details to find the document. It was a letter from the manager of the Motor Vehicles (driver licenses) saying they could not fill my request to give me a driver license in upper and lower case lettering for the name.


P.P.S. I made an interesting (at least I enjoyed finding it) related comment:

http://www.suijuris.net/forum/citize...errill-12.html

P.P.P.S. I think applying Alice and Wonderland and The Wizard of Oz; The Matrix Trilogy and soforth literally is a big mistake. In the case of Theosophy, The Wizard of Oz, you end up applying that quasi-religious symbology. Big Mistake. I should just repeat my comment about mistraining yourselves about law. It will do you no good.

[FreeFromContract]

Originally Posted by legalII

My state (Sec of State Office) will not allow me to register as a trademark my ALL CAPS name, saying that I cannot register my name as a trademark, as names cannot be trademarked, whether all caps or not.

Do I have any recourse?

How can I force them to allow this?

I have already filed a UCC-1 financing statement for my ALL CAPS strawman name.

Thanks.

As several people have mentioned, go the registered trade name route. Send in a letter with your form to register your trade name, explaining the US Code is the foundation and authority for the request.

Check this...
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/h...7----000-.html
(interesting all the different permutations of "person", isn't it?)

and this...
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/h...2----000-.html
(note paragraph [d] and reference to "trade name")

and if you really want to make them choke on their lunch, include this.....
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/s...5----000-.html

Thanx much for the above.

I am sure that my app will probably be approved by their legal counsel, but in case it isnt, I am sure that what you have provided will nail it down.

[artificialsteve]

[quote=David Merrill]I think the concept of re-registering the Strawman is silly. Those who espouse the theories do not make a distinction between the true name and full or legal name. [quote=David Merrill]




"re-registering?" Are you trying to say that everyones STRAWMAN is already registered.......According to this statement....my STRAWMAN is already MY property, and I am already a corporation doing business for profit.....

...yet I hear forum members saying that the STRAWMAN is not my property ......and trying to register it or copyright it is "against the law"......

....folks...this whole debate is getting silly


The problem with the SOS is that they already know the STRAWMAN and you are different.....but they need to give you a piece of paper saying that it is......HELLO!

The fact that folks can and are successfully registering their tradenames is PROOF......that you can take control of the fictitious business identity called the STRAWMAN

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by artificialsteve

"re-registering?" Are you trying to say that everyones STRAWMAN is already registered.......According to this statement....my STRAWMAN is already MY property, and I am already a corporation doing business for profit.....

...yet I hear forum members saying that the STRAWMAN is not my property ......and trying to register it or copyright it is "against the law"......

....folks...this whole debate is getting silly


The problem with the SOS is that they already know the STRAWMAN and you are different.....but they need to give you a piece of paper saying that it is......HELLO!

The fact that folks can and are successfully registering their tradenames is PROOF......that you can take control of the fictitious business identity called the STRAWMAN

A member here has managed to register the all upper case letters in sequence of a local politician. She says she will be prohibiting him from using her name at the next meeting and the reelection campaign posters using it must come down. This is the kind of intelligence, once authenticated, that I love in my arsenal. We will see.

I am saying that the birth record entered into the State was signed registry of a trust/artifice in anticipation of my using it later in life - after I turned 18. It may not be directly with the SoS but instead with the Department of Health because of the illusion that encryption is me, a man. However even "David Merrill" is a representation. It is just truly what my parents named me when welcoming me into the Van Pelt family.

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...tification.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ification2.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ification3.jpg



Regards,

David Merrill.

[kothjjh]

In Texas JOHN CORNYN
Attorney General of Texas July 18, 2000
A county clerk is not required to accept for filing a document, purported to be a financing statement under chapter 9 of the Business and Commerce Code, if the document names the same person as the debtor and the secured party.


Is this not what the state does when you get you're car,van,truck tag/registered is make you the debtor and the secured party ?