enslegis,
Below is a link to a rebuttal to some of the "Factoids" that have been posted all over the internet. You can't believe everything that you read. You must do the research.
THE WHOLE THING IS A PACK OF LIES.
Geesh, where do "they" keep coming up with this stuff?
That which is posted below in red was received via e-mail on the above date. Apparently, this message was designed to provide "very secret information" about a wide variety of sinister matters for the purpose of convincing the message's reader about the validity of certain legal positions. I can only comment about certain legal points raised in this message, and then not all of them because I am not going to waste a lot of time debunking this garbage. But this type of message is representative of what lots of people unfortunately believe.
<font color=red>3.) The U.S. Has not had a Treasury since 1921. (41 Stat. Ch.214 pg. 654)[/color]
This contention has been promoted by many who advocate UCC arguments. I provide here the above referenced pages from 41 Stat. ch. 214, which was an appropriations act for the federal government. These pages show that this act abolished some Treasury offices and also directed the deposit of government funds with various Federal Reserve Banks. I fail to detect how Treasury was abolished.
The truth is otherwise. The Department of the Treasury was created in September, 1789; see 1 Stat. 65. In 5 U.S.C. §101, Treasury is listed as an executive department. The establishment of Treasury is codified at 31 U.S.C. §301. We certainly have a federal Treasury today; see 31 U.S.C. §302.
Rather than being deceived by incorrect information like the above, if you wish to learn about the money issue, read this brief posted on this site, and you should also read Edwin Vieira's Pieces of Eight. Edwin is the foremost legal scholar regarding the money issue.
<font color=red>4.) The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. (Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg. 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288)[/color]
For the above proposition, the message's author cites some pages from Presidential Documents, which are not posted on the Net. However, the author does cite "22 U.S.C. 285", et seq., which sections are so posted; however, review of these laws shows this proposition to be without foundation. Here is 22 U.S.C. § 285:
The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States in the Asian Development Bank (hereinafter referred to as the ''Bank'') provided for by the agreement establishing the Bank (hereinafter referred to as the ''agreement'') deposited in the archives of the United Nations.
Here is 22 U.S.C. § 286:
The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States in the International Monetary Fund (hereinafter referred to as the ''Fund''), and in the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (hereinafter referred to as the ''Bank''), provided for by the Articles of Agreement of the Fund and the Articles of Agreement of the Bank as set forth in the Final Act of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference dated July 22, 1944, and deposited in the archives of the Department of State.
Both 22 U.S.C. §287 and 22 U.S.C. §288 are long and are not posted on this page but please follow the links to FindLaw. How does membership in the IMF make Treasury the IMF or any part of it?
<font color=red>6.) The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the United States government. Even though the "US Government" held shares of stock in the various Agencies. (U.S. V. Strang , 254 US 491, Lewis v. US, 680 F.2d, 1239)[/color]
The Federal Communications Commission was created by Congress via the law codified at 47 U.S.C. §151. For the CIA, see 50 U.S.C. §403. The creation of the FBI involves old matters which I merely cite. Via an act of May 22, 1908, 35 Stat. 235, a Bureau of Investigation was created. This agency was consolidated with the Bureau of Prohibition, Division of Investigation, in the Department of Justice via E.O. 6166 of June 10, 1933. This agency was later designated as the FBI by an act of March 22, 1935, 49 Stat. 77. See 28 U.S.C. §531. I live in Huntsville, Alabama, where NASA was started; see 42 U.S.C. §2472. Pull out the United States Government Manual and one may easily find references to various statutes for the creation of federal agencies.
The author of the message cites United States v. Strang, 254 U.S. 491 (1921), which was a case where the "United States Shipping Board caused the Fleet Corporation to be organized ( April 16, 1917) under laws of the District of Columbia with $50,000,000 capital stock, all owned by the United States..." This case does not stand for the proposition that any particular agency was not a part of the government. The case of Lewis v. United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (9th Cir. 1982) held that the Federal Reserve Banks were private corporations.
<font color=red>8.) There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)[/color]
The case of Federal Radio Comm. v. General Electric Co., 281 U.S. 464 (1930), simply deals with administrative procedures of federal agencies, and concerns nothing about the creation of any courts. 1 Stat. 138 was simply an act to pay the debts of the United States.
<font color=red>9.) There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178)[/color]
The reference to 1 Stat. 138, an act to pay debts of the United States, has nothing to do with judges.
Here in Alabama, our Alabama Constitution contains provisions regarding the establishment our courts, as does Alabama Code, Title 12. Federal courts are dealt with via 28 U.S.C.
<font color=red>14.) New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Gulliani stated on C-Span that "New York City was the capital of the World" and he was correct. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 ( (2) (2)[/color]
Perhaps the best indicator that the author of the message discussed here was taking illicit drugs is this part. The reference to 22 C.F.R. §422.103 for the amazing proposition that New York is the capital of the world is pure fabrication; this regulation concerns solely Social Security Numbers.
<font color=red>20.) The King of England financially backed both sides of the Revolutionary war. (Treaty at Versailles July 16, 1782, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)[/color]
The contention that we are Brits is fully discussed here. The foreign country that loaned money to us during the Revolution was France, not the King of England.
<font color=red>22.) America is a British Colony. (THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION, NOT A LAND MASS AND IT EXISTED BEFORE THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR AND THE BRITISH TROOPS DID NOT LEAVE UNTIL 1796.) Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, The Society for Propagating the Gospel, &c. V. New Haven 8 Wheat 464, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774.)[/color]
Please read my article, "We Ain't Brits." You may also read the Articles of Association which are posted on the Net; those Articles do not support any contention other than at the time, we were on the eve of war with the King of England.
<font color=red>31.) " The People" does not include you and me. (Barron v. Mayor &City Council of Baltimore. 32 U.S. 243)[/color]
The case of Barron v. Baltimore dealt with the port at Baltimore and a "takings" issue. An attempt was made in this case to apply the 5th Amendment's "takings and just compensation clause" to the city.
<font color=red>32.) The United States Government was not founded upon Christianity. (Treaty of Tripoli 8 Stat 154.)[/color]
The above is not what the United States Supreme Court stated in Holy Trinity v. United States, 143 U.S. 457 (1892): "and for this plain reason that the case assumes that we are a Christian people, and the morality of the country is deeply ingrafted upon Christianity, and not upon the doctrines or worship of those impostors.' And in the famous case of Vidal v. Girard's Ex'rs, 2 How. 127, 198, this court, while sustaining the will of Mr. Girard, with its provisions for the creation of a college into which no minister should be permitted to enter, observed: 'it is also said, and truly, that the Christian religion is a part of the common law of Pennsylvania.'"
How about these various Presidential Proclamations and the frequent references to "Almighty God"? The below links are to various Proclamations published in the United States Statutes at Large which are posted on the Net. Some of these are several pages long, so please remember to hit "next image" to flip the pages of the Stats when reading some of these proclamations.
11 Stat. 754 11 Stat. 756 11 Stat. 763 12 Stat. 1261
12 Stat. 1263 12 Stat. 1270 13 Stat. 733 13 Stat. 735
13 Stat. 743 13 Stat. 749 13 Stat. 755 13 Stat. 773
14 Stat. 817 15 Stat. 701 15 Stat. 711 16 Stat. 1129
16 Stat. 1137
You can click here to use the links for some of the above Statutes and case cites. Check out this rebuttal, click the links to the documents discussed, read them and decide for yourself if they actually state what the "Factoid" writer claims they do.
It's my pleasure to be able to assist in this matter.
Ice
)
