All Capital Spellings

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by KarenM

Why do you criticize that concept? Isn't that YOUR modus operandi?

Close enough to an actual insult...

You Readers may find me a lot less responsive to KarenM in the future. Ignore List.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[KarenM]

Such is to be expected from David Merrill. Whenever his sources or his research is challenged, he has a sissy fit and turns on his ignore list.

He is a complete intellectual coward and is habitually unwilling to have any of his "sources" be subjected to any request to validate that they exist anywhere outside his imagination.

Unnamed 'suitors', unattributed quotations, images so heavily redacted as to make their verification impossible, and reliance on out-of-context legal citations are David's stock in trade.

[mrg]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

Close enough to an actual insult...

You Readers may find me a lot less responsive to KarenM in the future.

Ignore List.

Regards,

David Merrill.

Nikki?

[rottweiler]

That is what he said. You got a reading problem or something?

Originally Posted by KarenM

David:

I have read the Protocols.

A a matter of fact, I read them in English, German, and Russian.

I have also worked with people who have studied them, their history, and their origin.

The fact that you refer to them as anything other than a blatant effort to incite anti-Jewish sentiment casts doubt on your intellectual integrity.

[David Merrill]

Who else is so infatuated with me?

It is refreshing to know that such a piece of work is rare indeed. The Ignore List is reserved for those who can distract a thread with such minutia and lies as to say they have read the Protocols in three languages and even admit it to be a forgery of a previously extant document. Only to try attributing me to saying that the forgery was not committed by a Jew-hater?




Regards,

David Merrill.

[Shoonra]

Nobody is infatuated with you .... except, perhaps, your jail cellmates.

Holy Blood, Holy Grail was one of the early books of DaVinci Code nonsense. Taking it seriously for history is like using a UFO magazine for science.

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by Shoonra

Nobody is infatuated with you .... except, perhaps, your jail cellmates.

Holy Blood, Holy Grail was one of the early books of DaVinci Code nonsense. Taking it seriously for history is like using a UFO magazine for science.

Ouch!!

Appealing to my homophobia - unfair! I will shut up now.

Yet Holy Blood, Holy Grail still has 10+ pages of bibliography and 30+ pages of Notes and References. Since The DaVinci Code is fiction, and people were taking it a little too seriously, that is the inherent purpose of the bogus cause I mentioned - Baigent suing Brown for plagiarism.

Baigent, being Senior Editor of Freemasonry Today saw it served the greater cause of concealing the Treasure of Jerusalem to allow Holy Blood, Holy Grail and the movements of the Priory to be sullied in the public conscious. Since Brown was never playing DaVinci as anything more than fiction based loosely in Masonic symbols, he answered knowing no judge would allow an authentic history book like HBHG to entertain plagiarism charges. You cannot plagiarize history.

Holy Blood, Holy Grail was one of the early books of DaVinci Code nonsense.Taking it seriously for history is like using a UFO magazine for science.

Anybody who has read the Bible knows that bloodlines are transmitted through history by males. Not the women. So of course Dan Brown's nonsense in entertaining fiction cannot sully Michael Baigent's HBHG from twenty years earlier - an obviously substantiated history book.

Independent historians have come to the same concludions without relying too heavily on HBHG - like J.R. Church - Guardians of the Grail.

This is more of Shoonra's ADL doctrine spouted here. It is revealing doctrine-wise though. It involves finding one admitted fictional work to impugn a good history book from twenty years earlier. Like KarenM's resorting to a Wikipedia and insults...

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...en_snippet.wmv

Compare how Godfrei looks a lot like Liam... How did they know what Godfrei looked like?


Regards,

David Merrill.

[SaveUncleSam]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

Perhaps you should go back to some research for yourself. The forgery was done by a Jew-hater, or at least somebody framing the Jews. But the Protocols was obviously a forgery in the sense that the document existed and was altered to frame the Jews.

Interestingly I learned this interpretation from a history book Holy Blood, Holy Grail which was primarily authored by Robert Baigent; Senior Editor of Freemasonry Today last I looked. I think you should really get a grip on the history instead of buying into the ADL-style backlash that would rewrite history of the Protocols to be a complete fabrication. You even admit I am right by calling the Protocols a forgery at all. The definition of forgery means it imitates a previously extant document.

I am not even jabbing at the Jews and expect educated people to understand that. The Jews are the product of Babylonian intellectual conquest, taking the Israelites into Babylon for seventy years and the adoption of pagan Babylonian practices (the Babylonian Talmud) then unleashing them back into the Eretz (The Land) to rebuild the Temple. The Israelites, including the Jews are Semitic - of Shem. The Ashkenazim are Japhetic:





The sons of Japheth are historically held to be the central Rus - Russians. And it was these pagan folks living in the Caucusus Mountains between the Caspian and Black Seas that adopted Judaism out of convenience in 740 AD - the Khazarian Conversion.

http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/Khazar.jpg

By reading the book The Thirteenth Tribe by Koestler, which I have I can tell you the reason for the implication that the Khazars are the armpit of Judaism is that they only converted for political reasons.

Thanks for inviting the explanation that I am no Jew basher. I do not want the many Jews who are my friends to even consider it. The Jews who are my friends are in my esteem way too intelligent to buy into the Khazarian party line anyway. However the true implementation of the Protocols as a philosophy comes right to the surface from the true bigots; Shoonra and KarenM. The Protocols in fact advocate the death and persecutions of large populations of Jews through Pogroms and primarily the Holocaust so that the ADL-style doctrine can quickly call people citing true history bigots and anti-semites.

The term does not even apply - Semite. Of course if you think in the least originally, you would have read The Protocols before forming an opinion about them.


Regards,

David Merrill.

David: Doesn't the term "semite" not even mean Jewish? I heard that somewhere before...

The ADL (my opinion: free speech attackers, haters of America) was created in 1913 along with the Federal Reserve and modern day I.R.S. - what a bad year for our Republic.
I really love how the establishment created the ADL as a means to instantly label people as "Jew-haters" or later as "Holocaust deniers" to discredit them when they rebel against the system!
If you look around their website, especially the "Law Enforcement" sections, one realizes how truly hateful THEY are toward Christians and those who believe they are their own masters, under God. Notice how they viciously attack the Sovereignty movement as well as Patriot and State's rights groups (all of which have nothing to do with the Jewish faith or ancestry). They label them "anti-semetic", "racist" and "white supremecists". Seems to me the ADL is not about Jewish equality but rather, they are about playing to a government scripted tune.

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by SaveUncleSam

David: Doesn't the term "semite" not even mean Jewish? I heard that somewhere before...

The ADL (my opinion: free speech attackers, haters of America) was created in 1913 along with the Federal Reserve and modern day I.R.S. - what a bad year for our Republic.
I really love how the establishment created the ADL as a means to instantly label people as "Jew-haters" or later as "Holocaust deniers" to discredit them when they rebel against the system!
If you look around their website, especially the "Law Enforcement" sections, one realizes how truly hateful THEY are toward Christians and those who believe they are their own masters, under God. Notice how they viciously attack the Sovereignty movement as well as Patriot and State's rights groups (all of which have nothing to do with the Jewish faith or ancestry). They label them "anti-semetic", "racist" and "white supremecists". Seems to me the ADL is not about Jewish equality but rather, they are about playing to a government scripted tune.

The link I failed to mention is that 95% of all Jews are Ashkenazi Jews - Japhethites. The remainder are Spanish Jews - Sephardic Jews. They have a Semitic connection found in the Book of Obediah.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[Shoonra]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

I failed to mention is that 95% of all Jews are Ashkenazi Jews - Japhethites. The remainder are Spanish Jews - Sephardic Jews.

Not quite so small:
http://www.jewishgen.org/Sephardic/popul.HTM

Is there an organic difference between the two groups? Genetic studies found positive proof of familial relathion between the two.