Releasing Prisoners VIA IBOE

[sheisaceo]

Originally Posted by weishaupt1776

For those who want to accuse me of "peeing in the pool'; please post photocopies of your miracle remedy "IBOE - Get Out OF JAil Free Card"

Hey, you are one of 'them'! You have to know that if anyone post any public declaration of this that they are subject to having 'dishonored their presentment' and would be put in jail!

WHO THE F*CK ARE YOU?

[sheisaceo]

IBOE - that's the international bank of england isn't it?

F*CKERS~!

[Shoonra]

IBOE supposedly means International Bill of Exchange. There is a multinational agreement (including the US) on International Bills of Exchange, but it sets forth the criteria for such a document and what's been suggested on this thread doesn't qualify.

I had found two court cases that rejected documents with the same phrasing that bore the title "Bonded Bill of Exchange" (both can be found on the internet).

Courts have learned to be very cautious about what they'll accept as bond for a defendant. But even cold hard cash will only be bond for a defendant, not someone already sent to prison, and I don't have an inkling about how it could affect someone's criminal record.

[sheisaceo]

Originally Posted by Shoonra

International Bill of Exchange.

International Bill of Exchange.
International Bank of England.

There is no difference.

[mrg]

Originally Posted by sheisaceo

WHO THE F*CK ARE YOU?

[sheisaceo]

And this means what? Messenger? What is up with this TALKING IN CIRCLES? Can't anyone deliver a straightforward f*cking answer? It's like I have to drag this out of everyone! What is the deal with that?

Is this satanic thing that far-reaching?

[mrg]

Originally Posted by sheisaceo

International Bill of Exchange.
International Bank of England.

There is no difference.

Prove it.

[freemyggle]

http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.bills.of...988/doc.html#1

[freemyggle]

According to what I read recently, (NO PROOF), but in the bonded release on a boe is that the iboe is supposed to balance the ledger for the court. A fictional "payment" for a fictional debtor. It makes sense in my pewnie pea brain, but I didn't care for the authors whole explanation in that the author suggested that the da's and judge where all confounded and released the orders of the court to the individuals issuing the bonds.
I am just getting to know alot of different things regarding my supposed freedom. I am interested in learning more about bonds in general. If any1 can post some links for me, I would so appreciate it. Thanks

[rentiap]

Originally Posted by mrg

Prove it.

Actually I think it proves it's self within it's own writings.

http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/43/a43r165.htm