AARON RUSSO FILM - Freedom to Fascism

[Bulletproof Monk]

http://www.freedomtofascism.com/

[David Merrill]

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ublicMoney.wmv

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ney_case_1.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ney_case_2.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ll_juliard.jpg

[David Merrill]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...42777258&hl=en

[BOBT12]

Originally Posted by Bulletproof Monk

http://www.freedomtofascism.com/

This is an awesome film!

[cdsea10]

i saw the film last night... the raid on the house with the man in the shower was chilling. son smashed to the ground whe he went to open the door knob and the thugs smashed the door open...

i work for a u.s. corporation and i was talking to one of the computer guys that travels around the plants in north america. when i started talking about the verichip implants... he chimed in that in rio de jinero at the night clubs... all the regulars have the chip... don't have to bring a wallet, purse or cash... just flash your hand and it reads 'you' ... order a drink or food or whatever and the server scans your hand and it goes to your bill and when you leave... you flash your hand and your bar nights bill is closed out. not just young people ... all ages have the plants there.

i was stunned but 'they' are sneaking the use of them in broad daylight. so scary, happening so fast...

[SKYGZR]

Read the Above "Title" Before lambasting and spinning this reply......

**THIS IS A COPY/PASTE***
Once Again....This is a COPY/PASTE !!!

***BEGIN****

I am familiar with that movie. I find that researcher generally irrelevant.

If you read enough of my writings, you will see several references to "From Freedom to Fascism" as a production that largely distracts folks from simple and effective precautions (inclduing sheltering) and encourages angry self-pity and "contacting your congressman to complain." That is an exercise in futility, in my judgment, and there are other much more practical options (like sheltered bank accounts, sheltering earnings and assets, etc).

In my recent "election time" humor piece, the reference to "contact the Federal Reserve and demand that they abolish the US Congress" is a parody of Aaron Russo. I believe his movie perpetuates a fundamental misunderstanding and is thus generally misleading. More on that in a moment.

I consider it a solid forecast that the Federal Reserve will be part of the process to abolish the US Congress when that time comes. You may be shocked and dismayed about what I know (and recently posted to redpill_info) about the central banking globalization program (including the European Union), but never do I conclude with "and you should continue to abdicate your personal responsibility for your choices and the consequences of those choices and just wave your fists at the bankers and the politicians and so on."

Most of the people who watch Freedom to Fascism will make themselves into more obvious targets and that is probably why even extremely minor privacy precautions may be sufficient to stay clear. With tons of folks drawing attention to themselves, simple discretion is even safer. Let them "catch the bullets" as the saying goes.

Lots of my clients believe what the government agents told them in government schools: that fascism is foreign to the USA. That is a conclusion that many do not question. That is the premise of the movie's title: From Freedom to Fascism. There are other alternate conclusions that may have equal or more evidentiary support, if one wishes to explore.

The relevant point is that if you or I trust that someone is relevant because they are clearly sincere, you or I will get the consequences of that. Teachers in government schools are often sincere. Students from those schools are often sincere. Government-licensed doctors and lawyers and on and on my all be sincere, but sincerity does not equate to wisdom or prudence etc. I was sincere about Santa- when I was 4.

On the other hand, if you/I trust yourself/myself because you/I have identified something which is clearly relevant, you/I may experience very different consequences. Is Russo sincerely angry? Probably, but who really cares? However, there is no such thing as sincerely relevant, only relevant or not.

Taking care, we fare well!

JR
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/redpill_info
http://www.redpill.info

**END***COPY PASTE*** Once again---
**END***

Begin** with "my" thoughts..I like the flick, even "own" it, yet, what is presented above has substance!!**End*
with "my" thoughts...Happy Turkey.......

[dawgwise]

I am forced to agree with the simple basic premise of the preceding post.

One problem - lack of agreement. Camps are built and controlled similar to the controlling mechanism of nepotism.

At Sui there are those who, because they lack understanding of certain subjects and are expert in other subjects, believe their expertise supersedes their ignorance and that is the fundamental cause of disagreement and erroneous conclusions. The fore mentioned problem is evidenced regarding those errant positions presented in the movie.

However, it is a good movie and what is right is great and everyone should see it, if nothing more than to spark the questioning process within.

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by SKYGZR

Read the Above "Title" Before lambasting and spinning this reply......

**THIS IS A COPY/PASTE***
Once Again....This is a COPY/PASTE !!!

***BEGIN****

I am familiar with that movie. I find that researcher generally irrelevant.

If you read enough of my writings, you will see several references to "From Freedom to Fascism" as a production that largely distracts folks from simple and effective precautions (inclduing sheltering) and encourages angry self-pity and "contacting your congressman to complain." That is an exercise in futility, in my judgment, and there are other much more practical options (like sheltered bank accounts, sheltering earnings and assets, etc).

In my recent "election time" humor piece, the reference to "contact the Federal Reserve and demand that they abolish the US Congress" is a parody of Aaron Russo. I believe his movie perpetuates a fundamental misunderstanding and is thus generally misleading. More on that in a moment.

I consider it a solid forecast that the Federal Reserve will be part of the process to abolish the US Congress when that time comes. You may be shocked and dismayed about what I know (and recently posted to redpill_info) about the central banking globalization program (including the European Union), but never do I conclude with "and you should continue to abdicate your personal responsibility for your choices and the consequences of those choices and just wave your fists at the bankers and the politicians and so on."

Most of the people who watch Freedom to Fascism will make themselves into more obvious targets and that is probably why even extremely minor privacy precautions may be sufficient to stay clear. With tons of folks drawing attention to themselves, simple discretion is even safer. Let them "catch the bullets" as the saying goes.

Lots of my clients believe what the government agents told them in government schools: that fascism is foreign to the USA. That is a conclusion that many do not question. That is the premise of the movie's title: From Freedom to Fascism. There are other alternate conclusions that may have equal or more evidentiary support, if one wishes to explore.

The relevant point is that if you or I trust that someone is relevant because they are clearly sincere, you or I will get the consequences of that. Teachers in government schools are often sincere. Students from those schools are often sincere. Government-licensed doctors and lawyers and on and on my all be sincere, but sincerity does not equate to wisdom or prudence etc. I was sincere about Santa- when I was 4.

On the other hand, if you/I trust yourself/myself because you/I have identified something which is clearly relevant, you/I may experience very different consequences. Is Russo sincerely angry? Probably, but who really cares? However, there is no such thing as sincerely relevant, only relevant or not.

Taking care, we fare well!

JR
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/redpill_info
http://www.redpill.info

**END***COPY PASTE*** Once again---
**END***

Begin** with "my" thoughts..I like the flick, even "own" it, yet, what is presented above has substance!!**End*
with "my" thoughts...Happy Turkey.......

Excellent post.

The backing (bonding) for the Fed is confidence - conditioning that the money supply is backed by something other than debt. Shoonra goes on about me proving the US is bankrupt. It is citizens of the US pledging themselves bankrupt by endorsement of the bankruptcy... That is what makes the US bankrupt, is people thinking they are responsible for that bankruptcy.

The people put Congressmen and women in place for them to raise the debt ceiling and there you have it. Prevention of default is proof of the bankruptcy. Not some Chapter 11 filing like indicated by Rep Traficant in 1993.

The movie has its merits because it attacks people's conditioning. That undermines the potency of the confidence in SDRs (Special Drawing Rights). Read this clip from the 2006 Staff Report carefully if you want to know about UN paper gold replacing gold since P.L. 94-564 (Amendments to the Bretton Woods Agreements) and the secret Jamaica Rambouillet Accord in 1975-76.

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ill_Page14.jpg

Special Drawing Rights are a fictional currency basket of the most exemplary five nations averaged - meaning the most conditioned (stable Social Security/Fed/IRS subjection) nations. That is what I like about Aaron's movie.

However I do not like Aaron's movie much. It took me over a week and in two sittings to finish the thing. The way he presents it makes me sick. I mean really! Ever since I have been aware the monetary system is basically a Tontine on human flesh and bone that stuff makes me feel sick to watch.

The main problem with the movie is that he seems to think that people should only vote for representation that avows to abolish the Federal Reserve. Well the example is Ron Paul himself. He is in the movie quite a bit and not one peep about his 2002 Bill to sunset the IMF/Bretton Woods Agreements.

http://www.ecclesia.org/forum/images...s/1-HR3812.jpg
http://www.ecclesia.org/forum/images...s/2-HR3812.jpg
http://www.ecclesia.org/forum/images...s/3-HR3812.jpg
http://www.ecclesia.org/forum/images...s/4-HR3812.jpg

So I made my movie in counterpoint. The courts support one's right and entitlement to redeem private credit. The 1984 Article about Public Money is quite informative about law. People get checks cashed and deposited in non-taxable events. All withholdings are Refunded. People who protect their assets this way are abolishing the Fed, much more effectively than Congress ever will.

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ublicMoney.wmv

One suitor received a rubber paycheck. That meant the bank had to return the instrument to him upon notifying him he had to return the cash or that they pulled it from his account. But the bank tore off the non-endorsement stamp from the end of the check!

What this means is that the bank had already engaged in fractional lending upon that deposit before they discovered a lack of funds in the writer's account. That is against the law so the attorneys at the bank decided it best to try, however obviously, to destroy the evidence... (fabricated example attached)

A agree that a social rage is no good if based upon misinformation. Therefore I am sure Aaron Russo has received my video on DVD by now.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[David Merrill]

This fascinating topic about the torn paycheck boiled over onto related threads...

I am more on focusing on the right to public money. A suitor who is a notable author in macroeconomics says:

Hi David:

Before making a fruitless trip to the federal Reserve, I called up the CITY NAME Fed and explained that pursuant to 12 USC § 411 I had the right to redeem Fed notes for United States notes.

The converstation was hilarious. I said that I wanted to redeem Fed Notes for United States notes. No one understood what I was asking. I was asked if I had foreign currency or a certificate of some kind or a bond or treasury bill. I said Fed notes for U.S. notes.

I was turned over to one employee after another until I got to a fourth very senior employee who said he never heard of a United States note and that I could only get other Fed notes for Fed notes.

This senior employee then directed me to call an 800 number and this time the head of the department told me that a law that required the Feds to keep 300 Million Dollars of United States notes for the purpose of redeeming Fed notes was repealed and so they do not keep U.S. notes anymore.

I was then asked to contact the Secretary of the United States if I needed any more information. I sent a certified mail to the Secretary asking him where I can get public money more that a week ago. No response yet.

I suspect the use of Fed notes is mandatory.

I do not think that U.S. Postal Money Orders are public money either. All the legislatures only pass public policy statutes in the interest of the nations creditors following the national bankruptcy.

All of our lives, labor, and property have been secretly and fraudulently (because we did not give power of attorney or consent) pledged by the politicians as surety for the national debt which is in default. We are presumed debtors who voluntarily use private credit to discharge debts thus creating an unrevealed commercial contract with the Fed. government and as a result we are bound by all the public policy statutes which are obligations of that unrevealed commercial contract.

But, every system of law must have a remedy and a recourse or else we are all slaves (in violation of the constitutions)

We all must protest the use of private credit and notes.

I routinely stamp both sides of the Fed notes I use with a red ink stamp USED ONLY BY NECESSITY UNDER PROTEST.

A better stamp would be USED ONLY BY COMPELLED NECESSITY UNDER PROTEST, WITHOUT RECOURSE, & WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1-308.

If we were to file class action suits against state legislatures for FRAUD against its citizenry, their defense will be that they provided us a remedy against their public policy statutes in the UCC @ 1-308 & 1-103.

Most people do not know what to say if asked by a public official what they mean by the phrase "Without prejudice UCC 1-308" in conjunction with their name.

The answer:

When I hear from the Treasury, I will let you know.

Best Regards

True Name.

I highlighted a couple things.

Every law system has remedy. True in theory. The suitor suspects that FRNs have become mandatory. At least as I see it, those clauses are somewhat contradictory. In other words, he is saying that one must defeat all presumptions one has no remedy with every signature under contract law (the UCC). I am saying that is a cumbersome obligation.

I want to see it pressed that one not only has the right to public money from the moment they start using the non-endorsement stamp; one can retroactively defend against the presumption of private credit in the first place.

I am sure that if Shoonra was to put her mind to it she could find many Supreme Court cases that declare for all intents and purposes, the party making the presumptions without explicit good faith on the other party's part, is the one who must capitulate should it cause a dispute.

Along these lines:

It is that simple! Federal Reserve notes are not money and cannot be tendered when money is demanded: 105 So. 305 (1925). Moreover, the Ninth Circuit rejected the argument that a $50 Federal Reserve note be redeemed in gold or silver coin after specie coinage had been rescinded but upheld the right of the note holder to redeem his note in current public money (31 USC 392; rev., 5103): 524 F.2d 629 (1974); 12 USC 411.

Attached is evidence this is true when read by a trained attorney.


Regards,

David Merrill.


P.S. Of course I will be checking the current state of Title 12 (Banking) §411. I admit I have been presuming to this point that code has not been repealed. Even if it has it should guide one clearly to the current remedy in place.