Public Money Video

[David Merrill]

This is some elucidation of the 1984 Freedom League article about Public Money v. Private Credit.

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ublicMoney.wmv

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ney_case_1.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ney_case_2.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ll_juliard.jpg

[KaosTheory]

The video is ok but that computer voice needs to be replaced by a narrator.

I have no idea why someone would use a computer voice.

The word for today is "Fraud"......can you say ...."Fraud" boys and girls?

Of course you can.......

Welcome to Mr Satan's neighborhood.

[KaosTheory]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...4&q=sponge+bob

heh heh heh

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by KaosTheory

The video is ok but that computer voice needs to be replaced by a narrator.

I have no idea why someone would use a computer voice.

The word for today is "Fraud"......can you say ...."Fraud" boys and girls?

Of course you can.......

Welcome to Mr Satan's neighborhood.

That must be why you missed the point. You never read the article because of the computer voice. It left you thinking that the video is about the Freemasons when that is just there to make the point all of the private credit is voluntary, therefore it can be easily proven - no fraud.

Imagine the Masons coming to your door with a sword saying that you should get on your knees and let them tie you up with a hood so you cannot see anything. Do not worry, they will not hurt you - it is simply an act of trust... A simple initiation - everybody else does it.

Voluntary excludes fraud.

[re-ality]

The first time the article was read, the point didn't get home, however, when the computer voice was going and it was being read. The point got home very very quickly.

David, great video, thank you soo much.....continue being you, it's greatly appreciated

[Friendsplacect]

David, I truly enjoyed the video. I remember you talking about Public Money in other threads, now I have a better understanding of it. Have you or anyone here tried to exchange Private Money for Public Money at the Bank?

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by Friendsplacect

David, I truly enjoyed the video. I remember you talking about Public Money in other threads, now I have a better understanding of it. Have you or anyone here tried to exchange Private Money for Public Money at the Bank?

Yes. Many people are doing this.

Make up a rubber stamp for convenience but simply handwrite the non-endorsement meanwhile.

Someone suggested non-redeemable FRNs instead of non-negotiable FRNs. That makes sense but according to Shoonra, the article about the IRS auditors deeming the stamped paychecks non-taxable events is true.

Negotiable means they can be traded for higher forms of currency (FRNs for USNs). But if you have non-negotiable FRNs, then you are handling USNs in the form of FRNs.

Here's the golden lesson here though folks:

Even if it turns out I am incorrect with the verbiage, you have a right to public money. The Supreme Court says you are entitled to redeem FRNs! Therefore if any judge is deeming that you have not redeemed private credit for public money he begs the question, "Am I entitled to redeem FRNs?"

Well the answer is yes; which begs the question, "Then I am simply doing it incorrectly?"

See? If the attorney wearing the black robe is the custodian of law in the room, then he has already acknowledged you made a good faith effort to redeem private credit. And furthermore he has determined that the rubber stamp does not do that for you.

Now it is encumbent upon him to explain how you did it incorrectly and furthermore why your good faith attempts to do so originally cannot be honored.

Furthermore he must explain why the Fed's presumption that you endorsed private credit should be honored since your very first paycheck ... ever!



See where we are going with this??


Regards,

David Merrill.

[KaosTheory]

Full disclosure means full disclosure before the agreement is entered into. Meaning that I was informed personally and given the chance not to accept the terms.

Writing the terms in a large book somewhere and storing it with hundreds of other books is hardly informing me personally of the terms of the agreement.

This is fraud or at least, an attempt to defraud. It is known as an unconscionable contract. An agreement that no one would enter in to knowlingly and no one with any sense of morals would ask or expect someone else to enter into.

Why not lay the cards out on the table about credit money? Because people wouldn't opt into such a one sided system knowingly. Why should I accept only an interest in my property when I can own it free and clear?

This credit money game is all about handing over commercial power to a malevolent group of men who are bent on enslaving the world. It is about total control of all commerce world wide.

Was anyone told that they really didn't have to hand over their gold to the criminal gov reps who sold them out to a private bank?

We are engaged in commercial warfare pure and simple. It is about one group of people owning and controlling another group of people.

They have to use deception because the truth would set everyone free.

"We will have a one world government either by consent or by force."

Did you see this video yet? It's hilarious.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...4&q=sponge+bob

[PANICPASS]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

Negotiable means they can be traded for higher forms of currency (FRNs for USNs). But if you have non-negotiable FRNs, then you are handling USNs in the form of FRNs.

Negotiable does not mean they can be traded for higher forms of currency (FRNS for USNs). When a price is said to be negotiable, it means that the seller is open to the possibility of reducing the price, not raising the price.

Investor words define negotiable as:

The ability to be sold or transferred to another party as a form of payment. Something which is negotiable is transferable by endorsement and delivery. A negotiable instrument could be a check made out to you, because you could endorse it for payment to you or transfer it to someone else as payment to them.

[Big Al]

Where did anyone ever find a place in the law that says when you negotiate you can not raise the value of the thing being asked for? I do it all the time! I learned this method before I was 10 years old. This is a vary effective way to stop a low ball offer. Who says you can't raise your price to counter a lower offer, I always do.