Go to Constitution School

[rodgerdodger5]

http://video.google.com/videosearch?...+class+7&hl=en

You are a sovereign citizen. IT IS GOOD TO BE THE KING! (OR QUEEN) say that to yourself a few times! WATCH THE VIDEOS ABOVE AND START AT #1

[charlesa6]

Thanks for the link.

[aksis]

Can we get a copy of the booklet from this discourse posted into this thread?

[ndusa]

Originally Posted by rodgerdodger5

http://video.google.com/videosearch?...+class+7&hl=en

You are a sovereign citizen. IT IS GOOD TO BE THE KING! (OR QUEEN) say that to yourself a few times! WATCH THE VIDEOS ABOVE AND START AT #1

Pleae provide recent case law, statute, code, ect.. to back this horse **** up!? Please??

Hittler had several video's too, you buy that **** too!?

[ndusa]

Originally Posted by ndusa

Pleae provide recent case law, statute, code, ect.. to back this horse **** up!? Please??

Hittler had several video's too, you buy that **** too!?

I will in turn post two pages to blow this BS out of the water. Can we come back to reality for a moment?

[mrg]

Originally Posted by ndusa

Pleae provide recent case law, statute, code, ect.. to back this horse **** up!?

Please??

Hittler had several video's too, you buy that **** too!?

I will in turn post two pages to blow this BS out of the water.

Can we come back to reality for a moment?

Badnarik seems pretty good on the Constitution.

What do you have against him?

Have you even watched the seven hours, much less studied what the man has to say?

What has he said to which

"recent case law, statute, code, ect.. to back this horse **** up,"

is relevant, or even applicably possible?


In general, it would seem that the Constitution itself would not require

"recent case law, statute, code, ect.. to back this horse **** up,"

since the Constitution is the source from which that proceeds.


It is confusing to try and comprehend what you are saying.

Are you saying the Constitution is "horse ****?"

Are you saying that what Badnarik is saying concerning the Constitution requires validation through

"recent case law, statute, code, ect.. to back this horse **** up?"

It is difficult to discern whether you are attacking Badnarik, or rodgerdodger, or Charlesa6, or aksis, the Constitution, or all of them.

What, exactly is the

"horse ****"

to which you are referring?


If you are not a sovereign citizen at least as regards your own property, what are you then?

A subject, to a Sovereign, like the British?

Do you deny any concept of sovereign ownership of any property?

Is that the "reality" you would have them "come back to" "for a moment?"

[rodgerdodger5]

Hey Aksis! Book can be purchased here I believe.

http://www.badnarik.org/

Look down towards the bottom of the page.

MRG Thank you! hmmmm..Constitution is too hard for NDUSA ..lets back NDUSA up a little bit to this document.

http://memory.loc.gov/service/rbc/bdsdcc/02101/0001.jpg

It is nice and big .jpg so you can read. John Han****'s original sig is down at the bottom for you too. Check it out baby! You also might want to pay particular attention the the unalienable rights part of that document. Unalienable = no liens = cant be contracted away even if you try. This old english is cool as heck because I read the King James version of the Bible, I can almost read this.

[SaveUncleSam]

Nd seems to be of the camp who think laws have expiration dates. Why, in high school textbooks, they are referring to the Constitution as a "document that reflected issues and problems of that day". Ha! Schoonra seems to think that a 70 year old law somehow doesn't apply anymore. Forgot which thread that was on.

Hitler, very interesting... And who backed Hitler? Prescott Bush and international bankers. Just read up on how granddaddy bush made his first million $. And it wasn't from selling used tires.

[BornStupid]

Really good videos on the Constitution. I would love to see your argument against it though NDUSA.

I enjoy any information contradictory, so have at it. I think its useful to see oppositional arguments.

p.s.

rodgerdodger5, thankf for that great jpg. I have never feen one fo clear before. Thankf again. ;)

[rodgerdodger5]

Originally Posted by BornStupid

rodgerdodger5, thankf for that great jpg. I have never feen one fo clear before. Thankf again. ;)

LOL. Look at the very top over in the right column and read the list of greviances. sound familiar?

For those who don't get Born Stupid's joke translate the little old english 'f''s in the text without the crossbar to 's' and it will make perfect fenfe. I think I am going to change my handwriting for the letter s to thif too. . You miffpelled thif word. NO I DIDN'T